And when he keeps doing it over and over again
post
TIL that Trump is a bunch of dead cats in a trench coat.
His economic strategy, too
They’re eating the cats and dogs strategy
also the firehose of false hood. and its mostly to distract from the epstein and the BBB.
AKA flooding the zone, works best with a 24 hour news cycle. Thanks US for all your "innovation".
Kojima predicted everything in mgs2, now the problem is: did he predict everything in mgs4 too?
It should be called the "cat eating" strategy because it's the most ridiculous, unbelievable and unimaginative shit anyone can make up.
They can't even lie correctly, the feckin' losers. What a liberty!
Can the mods of this sub make more firm principles on posting rules? This title has nothing to do with the definition it's describing. Instead, it's an example of it. I'd consider opting out of here if nothing changes. Posts like this would've been removed on reddit. It's a place for what people learned, not for what people feel about what they learned. It's impossible to remove subjectivity but this post imo crossed the line.
Rodwell notes the term later finding a place in media coverage of the "outrageous pronouncements" made by Donald Trump during the 2016 Republican Party presidential primaries and his later presidential transition in the United States.[7]
The Wikipedia entry disagrees.
Rule 6 - one could post a [meta] post to comment on this sub and it's rules instead of distracting from the parent post (potential rule 8 vio if the mods were really particular). I would encourage you to [meta] post and propose the new rule or amended rule you think would address the problem you have with this sub; don't just complain, try to make the community in better. (And since you're new to Lemmy, please be aware "well, reddit did it this way" does not carry water with a lot of folks here. I would encourage you to include more independent justification for your proposed rule).
Or one could try to argue I violated rule 5 for "promoting an agenda" but since the Wikipedia article specifically mentions Trump as an example of the technique, I think any such argument would be a stretch. Again, up to how particular our mods are.

all 18 comments