all 3 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 14 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Presuming we can verify this story, it's a fascinating chain of custody...

But therein lies the issue; we can't verify the source, so this is at worst apocryphal and at best an unsubstantiated list of events.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 1 month ago (1 child)

    Judging by the sources list, it is based on how participants report themselves (including self-contradictory statements)

    It would be sad if the archive were lost forever by now

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 1 month ago

    it's been almost a decade since the last update and the age/id verification laws prove that the subject material has advanced considerably since then -- it's practically already gone.

  • source
  • parent
  • 1 comment in c/privacy@programming.dev view that post
    [–] 2 points 1 month ago

    So only 3 people have the archive? That makes it easy for the NSA and others: take out their copies and then start seeding doubt that it ever was a thing. No proof will be left behind.

  • source
  • 1 comment in c/interestingasfuck@lemmy.world view that post
    [–] 8 points 1 month ago

    This many years later I think the damage from publishing unredacted complete leaks is way better than letting journalists or governments handle transparency.

  • source