Maybe, making it as incorrect as possible serves to prove a point which makes statement phrased correctly for the goal in mind?
Are they overdue to go extinct somehow?
Oh, but isn't everyone from the US? And even if you're not, at least have decency to learn the relevant¹ geography in school
¹
…relevant being the US, of course. But learning in school in the US seems to be largely unavailable
/s
But he could've organised orgies to increase daily nudes views, optimisation
Like ‘hey, your baby is not covered, it's 43 minutes under due’
making January to most financially responsible time to have a medical emergency
Extremely well said, and an extremely sad thing to say, the system that makes you plan your medical emergencies is perfectly balanced, indeed
I would say it just got widespread use, I definitely heard of MS Word doing autofill as ‘AI’ at the time when deep learning was freshly invented thing. People tried to label a lot of things ‘AI’, with LLMs the label just stuck better
Reminds me of one video game,
…which is a medium spoiler for the game itself
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Soma_(video_game)
This is peak incompetence, I think, but it maybe shows that they see their mission not in preserving credible sources, but in breaking paywalls or something else entirely that is not forfeited by petty revenge edits
This is still my number one fear to hear about any archive, because altering the data when done properly may go undetected and lead people to wrong conclusions
That's a sound idea, but it really needs numbers, otherwise it looks rather pointless.
I'm not sure if Ford made profit from selling those cars (when unsold ones are accounted for), I'm not sure if Elon did, too.
This is why I usually enjoy the book more if I know some context about a writer, even if my conclusions about how it influenced a book are entirely wrong. I think it's better to know context for visual art, too, but indeed context is not a part of the artwork itself (although I believe not everyone thinks this way, and I don't know if I agree with them or not in the end)
I think maybe it's because almost any vapourwave scam has some legitimate use (NFT is definitely an exception, so maybe I'm totally wrong with other cases, too)