we're trying to bring this country together not divide it

Wait until you learn about juypter notebooks.

What are the actual consequences of this though? Michigan is an open primary state. Democratic party membership is meaningless.

Skeletons got a femur in his arm.

South Carolina is going to stick out even more with that metric.

Don't look directly at my god.

Unlike immutable distributions that lock you out of the native package manager

Direct pacman use is blocked. /usr/bin/pacman is a wrapper around pacman-real

Regardless, I do support attempts to make an immutable and declarative Arch distro. An an ostree implementation on Arch is an interesting experiment. You might want to check out Darch which boots from container images.

fuck I see it now.

Look if you want to do the 1900s millionaire philantropic bullshit, you just make a nice ornate public space and put your name on it. You don't build a monolithic museum to "your legacy". That's the sort of thing a villain with a Walt Disney mustache would do. Even he would have some taste and not build an obilesk that looks like the missingno Pokémon.

Its a common courtesy that if you publish something on the AUR, then you actually think people would use it and you plan to maintain it. You don't bother pushing some half baked afterthought to the AUR. Leave it on github. Otherwise you're just squatting a perfectly good AUR package name.

People are publishing their slop projects as if they intend on maintaining them, but they clearly aren’t capable or willing to actually maintain them.

This is my #1 problem with it. Just put it on github and call it a day. Don't act like its production ready at all. The #2 issue is namespace pollution.

This look like cucumbers not lettuce. Cut lengthwise and peeled.

$8 mil is pocket change for the investors. It's like eight dudes all giving their bro $100 for his art project.

The HOMES mnemonic is now SHAME.

(I'm sure some lib on bluesky figured this out before me)

I think its false, therefore its misinformation.

You're calling me lazy when you don't post your own sources? You're getting offended by me simple asking "and where did you here this?"

You gotta point me somewhere here. What comm? Some old thread? The github issues?

Please be specific.

So its not tracking you across instances? Then its probably tracking the invidious instance itself and not you in particular unless invidious leaks some amount of data about your browser which is possible.

If you don't want YouTube to be able to develop a temporary profile from a single invidious session then I think you're out of luck. Either make a new session per-video or give up. Invidious needs to pass YouTube's bot management somehow and once it does YouTube will give it a trackable session token.

Are you always using the same invidious instance? Does it track across different invidious instances?