I'd go for the latter. The main reason being that banning Nazi ideology or speech is probably a violation of the First Amendment. Nazis are bad and their ideology is bad. But the First Amendment has been interpreted by the courts to prohibit government regulation of speech based on its content, except in very narrow circumstance. This usually means direct and specific threats.

Just to get in front of the usual counter examples folks try to use here. Yes, you can yell, "fire" in a crowded theater. In fact, if there is a fire, you really should. There is no prior restraint on yelling, "fire" in a crowded theater. Now, you might be held accountable for causing panic and injuries in the resulting stampede for the exits. But that is not the same as a prior restraint.

Slander is also not a prior restraint. I'm fact, it's usually not a crime. It's an actionable tort, a private cause for litigation.

I get it. Banning Nazis would feel really good. But it's basically a dead issue while the First Amendment holds. There are better places to spend political capital than tilting at a windmill.

So they don’t take office until next year, that means there’s time to organize your thoughts and not just scramble to the first thoughts you have because it’s the most exciting topics. Organizing your thoughts means you can take a few months to form a strategy to get many things done simultaneously, that way you don’t burn any options or bridges of good faith from across the aisle opportunities that make exist.

Is it likely you can get a veto proof majority on Epstein files or Nazi bans? Probably not. Republicans today are allergic to working with dems for the most part, with a few exceptions. Epstein file issues are far more popular as a platform among conservatives when compared to Nazi bans. That should be obvious now after the Trump years.

So do you really want to bring up Nazi ban legislation during a Trump presidency just to have it fail and then lose public support and political will for it? It might be best to wait until a dem president has a chance to take the presidency so they can sign the bill into law. Until then you can use existing laws and congressional powers to investigate Nazis who performed illegal acts during their hold on power over the government and used it in various illegal ways.

Go ahead an get votes on record for Epstein stuff. That will set up the next election to get rid of anyone who refuses to show up for the vote or who votes to protect the Epstein class. Read the files into record, as congresspeople are constitutionally protected from nearly all speech while on the floor in congress. Do the same for Nazi stuff, but be smart about when you actually come for the Republican Nazi wealth class, because it’s likely you’re only going to get one shot at that.

They should focus 100% on cost of living and nothing else.

The only reason they won the election is because Trump fucked up the cost of living for the average American. That is literally the only that matters to people.

Everything else is an optional side quest at best, and you'll only have time to take on side quests if you keep the main quest going.

we're trying to bring this country together not divide it

From a sentimental point of view, why not both? However:

Define Nazism and how banning it might be alright with the 1st amendment.

There is already a law that compels the AG to release the files. The department is still under republican control. The only thing that will change is that the committees trying to shine some light on the matter have more teeth. Keep in mind though that there may be democrat corpses in Jeffrey's cupboard and birds of a feather flock together, even among democrats.

They could get to work on stiffening penalties for sexual predators and their helpers. As well as going after those officials who in the past have turned blind eyes towards these cases in spite of evidence. A lot of that is on state level though.

Temper your expectations. This blue wave is great but anything they want to do runs into 47 breakwater until he's out.