Today I read a news article from today? Could you not post this in some news community?

I don't hold out much hope for them. I think they are the most interesting AI company, but I would bet they are also of the belief that the environment should be sacrificed for AI progress, as they also believe that AI will fix everything later

Anthropic rent compute to make up for their own shortfalls in ownership. You can see on their careers site that they are hiring datacentre designers.

Dana White isn't MAGA enough in my opinion. Hilariously though I think he has enough practice with pressers where he says nothing that gets anyone into trouble that he could actually do a relatively decent job.

I don't think I could even imagine a business that would benefit more from having electric chargers outside than Buccees. Hilariously short sighted of them.

I don't think it's that, but I can usually see an American by their dumbass shoes

All you have to do as a CEO is shut the fuck up and let your product do the talking. The less I hear about your shit views the more likely I am to stay with your product.

The hardware to run them on an individual level is relatively cheap, the required passthrough for anthropic/openAI is that they reclaim their training costs.

There is no chargeable "real cost". Chinese companies are making highly effective distilled models that can run on any decent hardware. The second the AI companies start cranking up the cost, methods of using the free models will come forward.

So basically we have a technology that puts everyone out of a job and doesn't even make any money for the producers. Stunning.

paywalled

I'm all in on solar for most places.

Sure it uses a bit more land, but it makes no noise, no pollution, there's zero risk of an accident, no targets for terrorism and your grid isn't completely shut down if it is somehow turned offline.

You don't depend on others for your own resilience. No need for oil, gas or uranium.

Unless you live in the high northern latitudes, there is almost no reason to not be building a durable and resilient battery-renewable grid

1. Trump's cabinet would sign off on that
2. Equally a simulated perceived threat would cause MAD