I can confirm that it's great.
There's no way you're actually this dumb. Come on. Quit trolling.
For the love of Christ, take it down. Why would you do that to yourself?
It's definitely that one
Pfft, clearly I was not reading carefully.
+1 for "to've". It's a good word.
Mm, luckily "vanilla beans" aren't actually beans. I think the people can handle the idea of a two-bean soup much better, don't you?
They should be banned on public roads in general. We need regulations on a maximum blind spot size.
Tik-what?
ꝡa lemiu jí ꝡá jıa bıao ké sıaokaıdo
pu chum shụqmueguaı jí lá sạzunofieq já Tóaqzu da.
naı tuao eıla jí haha
Hah, I was afraid you would say that when I wrote my comment. I don't mean expressive in the sense of "can encode X"; I mean expressive in the sense of "can nicely encode X". The bullshit you have to put yourself through in Haskell to get the core niceties of modules is unpalatable (to me, anyway).