[–] 1 point 1 month ago*

I think its actually a 'would do anything, if it's really neccessary'. But as long as no one knows really if i live longer or that i don't get cancer in 5 years if i stop smoking, why should i stop? It's about not taking action because of an not directly associatable outcome in an undistinct future.

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] 1 point 2 months ago

    Maybe i am a bit infuriated of the salami tactics, making privacy transgressions more and more frequent. Taking pictures after asking for permission is one thing, documenting an operation where only the operation area is in view might also be necessary.

    Infringing on patients privacy should be necessity-based, not by default. And the collected data should be protected as good as possible, not using some big data megacorps (that make their money off advertising or influencing people).

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] 0 points 2 months ago* (1 child)

    Theres so much interesting information in this 45minutes video and you cry about the information density in the first 15 minutes. You could instead write a comprehension about the interesting stuff and motivate people to watch it, maybe with minute-context; or you tell them: boring video, isn't worth watching. Thats what a carbrain would do. I loved the analysis about how they didn't give up finding a solution and not just stuck to a carbrainiac solution.

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  •  

    Was für eine schöne Idee. Leider nicht viel realistischer als eine hohe Erbschaftssteuer, es nimmt aber zumindest weniger Vermögenden die Angst, sie könnten dadurch etwas verlieren (beim Thema Erbschaftssteuern gibt es derartige Vorbehalte). Wie schön sich die progressive Vermögenssteuer und der Hebel nachhaltige ETF ergänzen war mir nie klar. Ein sehr lesenswerter Newsletter!

    view more: next ›