[–] 2 points 22 hours ago

Mine renews December as well. I panicked about the time crunch so I swapped to monthly and planned to go for a few months to transfer everything over. I'm using the credit I have for December and probably gonna roll the dice on any emails associated with Proton that I missed and cancel. Already moved everything out except VPN. Fuck 'em.

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] 4 points 1 day ago

    Do you remember how high it was? Last I checked a few days ago it was a little over 2k I think. I gave the benefit of the doubt about the Trump appointee comments but glad I took this last week to move things off Proton. Not sure about a VPN replacement and gonna pay a few months for any mail I didn't remember to move but otherwise I'm out and happy for it.

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 1 day ago* (3 children)

    Appreciate it thank you! So basically in either setup syncthing just checks for an updated version of the file on any device and replaces the old versions on all devices? Do I have this right?:

    A simple 2 device setup would be easy with a p2p structure, but can get convoluted when adding more as they all then need to connect to eachother. If I have multiple devices (which I do) a star-shaped structure means each device only has to connect to the main server device.

    In the p2p example, the phone adds a new password, the notebook sees the change through syncthing monitoring the phones folder, and replaces it's file with the new one. If I change something on the phone when I'm out of network, the change is local and works fine on the phone (but obviously wouldnt on the notebook) then syncs when i get back on the network and updates the notebooks file.

    In the star-shaped structure, all devices point to the server file. I change something on network on my phone, the server file then sees the change and updates, then the other devices do the same. If I change something off network, again the same as the p2p example with one extra step; once back on network the server sees the change on the phone, updates, then the other devices update to that.

    Is that the jist of it?

    Edit: So basically if I wait for my laptop, I set it up, then on my phone for example I set syncthing to the folder on the laptop, then change the local Keepass folder to the syncthing laptopo folder?

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  •  

    I'm starting my journey into astronomy and looking for a beginner telescope to start. I've found a few on telescopescanada.ca that fit my budget between $350 and $400 CAD but noticed a lot have "smartphone app-enabled" as a feature.

    Over the last few years I've found that smart connected tech just complicates things and have been reverting my tech back, often to the point of wired over wireless. What's the consensus when it comes to telescopes?

    Is app-connection a feature you use? I'm looking at the Celestron StarSense Explorer LT 114AZ but wondering if I'll be paying for smart features that aren't necessary.

     

    cross-posted from: https://lemmy.ca/post/69792385

    I love finding a movie that sticks with me for hours or days after watching so I felt like talking about it.

    It's certainly a vibe, decent acting (especially the voice acting through the coms), interesting story though I found the writing a little clunky, but overall I really enjoyed it. The concept of the static photos being the only way to see really added to the vibe of claustrophobia, helplessness, and tension.

    I absolutely adore "dirty" sci-fi; worlds that feel lived in and used, as well as sci-fi that throws you into the world without too much exposition letting you fil in some blanks without overburdening with details that aren't necessary, and this one did well with both. For lack of a better term, it has a "flavour" that really scratches an itch for me; the dirty, broken, retro/cobbled together tech in a world where things get used until they break, then used again. A world where you get a glimpse of it through one small story without learning about the bigger universe. In that vein it really remminded me of Prospect (2018).

    The set design was the standout, story was good, and the acting was good enough to not be distracting. Only nitpick was the sound design, where audio was a little muddled and poorly mixed at times. I find with claustrophobic films like this, they can really benefit from a real focus on polished audio.

     

    I love finding a movie that sticks with me for hours or days after watching so I felt like talking about it.

    It's certainly a vibe, decent acting (especially the voice acting through the coms), interesting story though I found the writing a little clunky, but overall I really enjoyed it. The concept of the static photos being the only way to see really added to the vibe of claustrophobia, helplessness, and tension.

    I absolutely adore "dirty" sci-fi; worlds that feel lived in and used, as well as sci-fi that throws you into the world without too much exposition letting you fil in some blanks without overburdening with details that aren't necessary, and this one did well with both. For lack of a better term, it has a "flavour" that really scratches an itch for me; the dirty, broken, retro/cobbled together tech in a world where things get used until they break, then used again. A world where you get a glimpse of it through one small story without learning about the bigger universe. In that vein it really remminded me of Prospect (2018).

    The set design was the standout, story was good, and the acting was good enough to not be distracting. Only nitpick was the sound design, where audio was a little muddled and poorly mixed at times. I find with claustrophobic films like this, they can really benefit from a real focus on polished audio.

    view more: next ›