It would be cool to see something like Plan9 get attention or a modern revamp. The idea is super cool, IIRC it didn't catch on because it wasn't a compelling enough improvement on Unix for people to switch.

Why not use Ideon?

Ah yeah fair, fair

Idk, aiming guns is kinda hard. I've never shot a sniper rifle irl but I imagine I'd have about the accuracy of a drunk child with one.

This is just a survey though, people are notoriously bad at estimating their own speed.

This certainly evoked some emotions for me, fantastic shot!

This one makes more sense cause your genitals are by default very sensitive to pain. So your body pumps out a bunch of hormones during arousal so sex doesn't feel like beating up your bits.

Its a lot of just world fallacy too

Here's a good article on it for anyone interested: https://www.wheresyoured.at/the-men-who-killed-google/ (article starts after the horizontal break)

Same amount of characters too

Reading speed is not equivalent to code review speed in the slightest! A good case study: https://static0.smartbear.co/support/media/resources/cc/book/code-review-cisco-case-study.pdf Tl;dr the ideal rate of code review is something like 300 lines per hour.

As someone who writes software for a living, these tools are simply nowhere near as good as a seasoned developer in terms of code quality. Getting them to write code at that level takes so much babysitting and tweaking that it is faster to just write it by hand. If you are not a full-time developer and are just writing some code on the side here and there, then yes, an LLM will probably do a better job. And thats ok! I've used them plenty and thought about this a lot as well. So I don't say this out of denial. But, at least for now, they are nowhere near a good as someone who knows what they are doing if you account for quality, and not just how fast the machine can spit out lines.

I mean I still prefer writing code by hand and I still write higher quality code faster by hand than others on my team who use LLMs to write code for them. Writing good, production intent, software is not about wpm, nor is more code necessarily better. Concision (as long as it doesn't sacrifice readability) is a virtue.