[–] 1 point 2 months ago (1 child)

The 'browser incompatibility' is what's written on the fallback page. The question was about the problem that migration from Cloudflare would solve and I provided one particular problem. Not that it affects me personally, because I use a standalone app for Lemmy, but I assume there are some people that do not wish to run Cloudflare js

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] 4 points 2 months ago (7 children)

    I use Firefox Focus on my mobile and I can't enter sites with CloudFlare because it says my browser is incompatible. It gets annoying when I ramp up my privacy on the Internet and sites outright refuse to load if they see I don't allow cookies and trackers. I'd rather see broken js-free website than pitch black CloudFlare page.

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] [S] 2 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 child)

    Oh right, that was not the whole Makefile, only the part that caused problems. As @fruitcantfly@programming.dev pointed out, it breaks down with more SOURCE files and populates the newly created directories with only the first SOURCE file. After some more poking and reading I found a method that works by using define:

    define rule
    $(DESTINATION)/$(shell echo $(notdir $(1)) | sed -E 's/^([0-9]{4})-([0-9]{2})-([0-9]{2})-(.*)\.md$$/\1\/\2\/\3\/\4.md/'): $(1) | $(DESTINATION)/$(shell echo $(notdir $(1)) | sed -E 's/^([0-9]{4})-([0-9]{2})-([0-9]{2})-(.*)\.md$$/\1\/\2\/\3/')
    	/bin/bash ./myscript.sh $$< > $$@
    endef
    
    $(foreach f,$(SOURCE),$(eval $(call rule,$(f))))
    

    I feel like this is an abuse of Make, but it works. When is it a good idea to delegate the building process to other tools?

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] 3 points 4 months ago

    Oh, then maybe a better word would be 'depressing' or 'alarmist' depending on your angle. I found it amusing that they didn't shy away from the topics of bullying and peer pressure enabled by unrestricted access to technology, while also not succumbing to typical 'technology bad' trope. Imo the message was very well balanced, but that's just Pixar being Pixar.

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] [S] 1 point 1 year ago

    Thank you. I thought that maybe there is some more 'official' way of such tile composition, but if not, then I will settle for some clever tile design to maximize reusability, at least for now. I don't want to overcomplicate things just yet.

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Hey, it's a great resource! I would put the table of contents on the main page or put a link to the first post, because now it's hidden behind hamburger menu (at least on mobile) and the first impression is that the page has no content. Also you have a lot of None pages that show 404.

  • source
  • view more: next ›