[–] 1 point 2 months ago

He is wearing a pin above his delta which I can’t quite make out but it looks like the design on the tunic he wears in TOS: “The Cage”, which is an Earth map encircled by laurel leaves.

Yep. TrekCore.com has this good clear picture of it.

  • source
  •  

    Brief Star Trek mention if you don't want to read the whole (lengthy) thing.

    DEADLINE: What is your plan for the Star Trek franchise? It is at crossroads with Strange New Worlds and Starfleet Academy ending and no new series greenlit. If I heard you correctly, you said that something is coming. Yes?

    WISEMAN: Well, it’s one of the reasons why Chris is here as the resident number one fan of the Star Trek franchise. And there’s so many people in this building, by the way, that are. It is our goal and it is our job to figure out what the next bounce of Star Trek is. We’re talking to a lot of writers, we are leaning on CBS Studios, and it is imperative that we figure out what the next iteration is in this franchise because it’s just too important. We also are in touch with Paramount Pictures, they have a Star Trek movie that’s in development.

    [–] [S] 1 point 2 months ago* (1 child)

    Not oligarchy, state disinformation and war mongering?

    My main reaction overall to the reveal was this iteration of Paramount ownership would have cancelled something that delved into these things as fast as it did the rest of the Trek slate.

    Also, it's slightly boggling that the fans who wanted this were hyped for Captain Seven (I think it's fair to say), and the premise was going to be....nah, let's do a Worf/Alexander/Klingon politics story? Who was asking for more Alexander stories?

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] [S] 5 points 5 months ago (3 children)

    Naturally I'm watching debates about the canonicity claim break out in assorted places.

    As far as I can find, the whole “it’s canon” claim comes from Webtoons in their press release, and no one from Paramount is being quoted making that claim. Unless there’s a separate Paramount press release I can’t find.

    So this whole claim is just silly.

  • source
  • [–] 8 points 7 months ago (3 children)

    Here's another one to ponder.

    I commented on social media that even though the press reports say the question is open, his "farewell" letter in the reports read to me like someone on the way out talking to his successor. And Brian Tatosky (one of the VFX team) replied:

    Yes, SFA being cancelled is part of ending his tenure of Trek once we finish the work we have.

    So it sure seems like the end of the road.

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] 16 points 7 months ago (5 children)

    Here's the first (big FWIW/grain of salt/etc) thing on the decision that's I've seen (besides the TrekMovie article note that 'it's no secret that the show didn't Nielsen chart'). From author Mike Chen on Bluesky.

    From the few insiders I know, viewership was actually above expectations and this was more of a "future of the franchise" corporate decision. I'm expecting Trek to be in flux as there are SO MANY variables. Everything from tech stocks to Iran to midterms is impacting Paramount.

    Leaving the link to his post here for reference but he has his posts hidden unless you're logged into Bluesky.

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] 3 points 7 months ago (2 children)

    There wasn’t a goodbye letter at the time of the Variety exclusive — but Deadline and everyone has it now.

    So you're saying Variety added it after the fact? It was there when I saw it, which was like 15 minutes after the time of publication.

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • view more: next ›