It’s called doomtrolling. Pass it on!

Not at all. I find Celsius much more intuitive but I’m not trying to argue that that is universally true.

It’s like people making these memes don’t understand that intuition is learned. One is not universally more intuitive than the other

But that two-braincell person still needs to have a few million $ to burn. I wonder what they could have done to the huggingface servers if they had used the token spend on this incident to pay Ukrainian hackers instead?

You would think this is what people pay Amazon to do. What is it they do pay them for, really?

In other news: Divers want shark cages; sharks do not

There’s nothing to “learn”. Using one of these is in no way different than using the other.

Asshats

I’ve got one hand gesture for them!

Cruise control lets me relax my legs. It’s purely mechanical.

Other automations like lane assist and emergency break system saves my ass if I’m not paying attention. FSD (if used as intended) does exactly the opposite: I have to save it’s ass if/when it overlooks something. I have to be constantly alert without almost ever having a reason to. The human mind is not made for that. I would 100% find it harder to pay attention in that scenario than if I’m also doing the driving and not because Elon is an asshole.

If I could check my email or read a book and have the car say “take over in 10 seconds time” I would get it, but if I’m constantly aware, hands on the ready and eyes on the road I would literally much much mucho much rather not have it at all.

But of course that’s not how it’s being used. Tesla drivers are willing to run the risk on behalf of themselves and anyone they are sharing the road with.

This is basically automation bias you’re describing and it’s what scares the hell out of me with these “FSD” teslas on the road.

Even if you were able to keep constantly alert during the 99% of the time where this works (which I think is close to humanly impossible) why would you want a system that doesn’t offload you at all? The only value of this system is if people ignore the limitations and allow themselves to zone out - the rest of us are at risk when it goes wrong!

I cannot begin to describe how many times I’ve had to re-type the same info in some input form because I hit esc when I had first finished it!

This is an extremely naive view of what the word “fail” means and of what such a “competition” would look like. Are you suggesting we just deploy increasingly critical systems onto this hypothetical fork until it predictably fails in an unpredictable way? Sorta like Calvin’s dad would rate bridges?

This is the trolley problem on steroids tbh. I have $10.000 in my savings. I could use them to save a whole lot more than one life! Yet I don’t. At face value this is no different from accepting the money and a rando kicks the bucket.

You didn’t make nitroglycerin. Maybe you could classify it it as a form of napalm though

Stop sharing this bullshit. It is a stupendously simplistic view that is propagated by those wanting to get in the way of cheap renewables.

Yes, it makes sense in some cases to cover parking lots, but it increases the price and complexity many folds and the areas needed in open land are next to nothing compared to the area being used to grow energy crops today.

The meme should be “stop covering our land with fertilized, pesticide covered corn and rapeseed that go into combustion engines, cover it with solar instead”

Well, if you want to go all “technically” on this, then that sound technically dissipates as heat when it is absorbed by the interior of the room.

Of course you survived! The ones that died from traumatic brain damage aren’t around to make stupid comments

EVs Teslas crash more.

“Some of these accidents involved Tesla’s self-driving system.”

Uh, EVs are safer than ICE cars