If you think that's bad, this flaw is rated a 22.
You have been. Everyone reading this post is using code touched by them, up and down the stack.
This is obvious from the new bugs in everything after every update
Mr Burke said the time between detecting a cyber vulnerability and exploiting it was previously about two and a half years, but with the advent of AI that window had narrowed to about 10 hours.
I assume somebody from Anthropic told him that, there's a reason "Patch Tuesday" was followed by "Exploit Wednesday".
Yeah, it's taken from FreeBSD.
https://github.com/apple-oss-distributions/xnu
Any OpenBSD references are related to things like documentation and the "pf" firewall, which FreeBSD imported from OpenBSD to begin with.
That's only half the quote
The US power sector would emit 2.1 billion metric tons of carbon dioxide by 2030, after factoring in planned AI projects, which is 618 million tons more than 2025 levels, or about a 42% increase.
So the estimated total increase is 618 million tons
The bulk of the expected emissions by 2030 would come from sources that are not directly linked to the grid, often built by tech companies to avoid the long wait for a connection. These could exceed 460 million tons, Fisher said, roughly the same as the annual emissions of Mexico.
So over 460 million tons of the 618 estimate is primarily datacenters, nearly 3x of the rest of the country, which is only using 158 tons more.
It's an old picture, header image says "20th Anniversary", and FreeBSD has been around since 1993.
Back in the day people used Squid for that if they needed it.
"Finding" is also rather generous, going by numbers from Anthropic and from the Linux kernel, things like Mythos are wrong 95% of the time.
They're much easier to run though, compared to more reliable tools. So even being wrong 95% of the time wins out if you've got 100x more people running them.
Slack space for bad sector remapping maybe? Similar to SSDs being over provisioned.
And with partitions being offset 1MiB from the start of the drive (For alignment), the extra space would help preserve capacity anyway.
So Scarlett Johansson was in their ads for a while back in 2014, made a bit of a stir since she was also an Oxfam ambassador, and Oxfam are against the settlements.
When she had to choose between them, she chose Sodastream, and cut ties with the charity she had been involved with for more than 7 years.
Never really had a good opinion of her since.
But seriously, why do I need GPU acceleration for my chat UI?
Because rendering things is quite literally the reason GPUs exist, it takes load off the CPU and is more efficient at it to boot.
How does letting AI companies have total access to creators work without needing permission or licensing fees, help them exactly?
The linked article is talking about protecting people making the models, not making the content (It actually specifically says that letting creators choose license their content would actually hurt them, and that AI companies should always have access)
That street goes both ways, there's more GPLed code in the training corpus than there is leaked proprietary code.
Disney will be able to negotiate and get a large chunck of money from the companies, any small time artist will be denied their art was used and not get anything.
That's literally the current situation, that's why journalists and authors are trying to sue over it.
The EFF is effectively siding with "Disney" here in this case
There's probably flaws that would allow executing attacker supplied code, but it's not like BIOSs had any notion of security (i.e. secure boot) to begin with, so you could just straight up have the system boot into your own image anyway.
Static sites with things like CGI "endpoints" were a thing back in the day. There's no need for URLs to have a 1:1 mapping to the filesystem, you can have a half static and half dynamic site if needed.
Cool, so just like Half Life 1 then.
https://kotaku.com/half-life-npcs-can-smell-corpses-1818824392
Nah, PXE predates UEFI by like 20 years, it's been a pretty normal feature since the late 80s.
Either the Sleeper Simulant from Destiny 1/2, or an AER9 Laser Rifle from Fallout.
As nice as DANE is, it just shifts the burden of trust to your DNS provider. Like if you hop on Wi-Fi at a coffee shop, said network can simply MITM connections and supply their own certs via re-writing the DNS.
You can encrypt DNS to prevent that, but now you need a way to ensure your DNS client already trusts the desired DNS server, etc.
As much as people dislike CAs, they're a proven solution to a problem that's already implemented in nearly every device on the planet.
view more:
next ›