Fucking what?

A Piranesi stop motion film? Based on the book?

Not necessarily mutually exclusive

Labels don't matter, be happy

Anyone else seeing an older, rounder Michael Cera?

I wasnt suggesting it would be easy, in fact i think it would be rather difficult on both fronts.

My comment was more about the method by which this kind of thing was intended to be addressed.

I imagine this is a controversial opinion....but isn't the idiomatic solution to this to either:

petition the mods to get this rule added and enforced

or

To start a community that enforces this rule and let it compete with this one.

Isn't that the whole idea of federation?

I really enjoyed the story and style, enough to work through the 'meh' gameplay, though some of the puzzles were kind of interesting.

I think I'd have enjoyed it more as a book or perhaps a TV series, movie would be too short.

I see, that's my bad, I thought this was a conversation, but it's actually a rant.

No worries, I rescind my participation

You go off king/queen/.

You're conflating commercial competency with personal likeability.

The difference between

Steam is provably the superior platform and that's why they are successful.

Vs

Steam is better because I like gaben.

Defending commercial competency is logically consistent.

Defending a billionaire personally is not.

Now go back and look at what was being defended.

First thing is to separate out the term AI from LLM's.

AI as a term encompasses many different technologies, some going back decades, a lot of which is used all over the place.
What we're hearing a lot about right now are LLM's and the surrounding ecosystem.

To answer the question though, yes, they can be used to produce output that fits a use case.
Whether or not it's the best tool for the job is subjective, even in the cases where it's technically viable.

There is a lot of bias and a lot of arguments for both sides.

You'd probably be best served by reading around a bit and figuring out how you feel about it.

You're unlikely to get an unbiased discussion from a single source, especially here.
I'm not excluding myself , I'm bias AF.

The technology is interesting, the industrial implementation is an environmental and societal catastrophe.

It's absolutely fine at some stuff, provided you know enough to spot any mistakes it might make.

Just because you can do it with an LLM, doesn't mean it's the best tool for the job.

it's in the second link (or at least the dev's side is)