Other than size of the keys there's nothing wrong with it. Still plenty secure (from classical attacks)
Eh, if you use the API, I just go up a size and use bitwise operators, the JIT is fast enough that it's usually not a problem. Definitely not 100x slower
🤔 I do believe this is backwards, or you're Japanese
I have written a lot of code that would benefit from primitive unsigned ints...and while it is a little more work to do it java's way, it's definitely not a horrid mess
That's ok, I have enough RAM that I'm not particularly worried about that either. I also don't leave my computer on all night, I like to be nice to my tech, also locks my drives
Lol, I stopped swapping when I got enough RAM to never need swap
Porting Hurd to RISC-V??? Why? Last I knew they hadn't added amd64 or UEFI support, adding a whole other ISA seems a little over ambitious for that project if you ask me
I may actually be the other way around. I'm probably better at networking than programming? Not sure, I love them both but do neither professionally.
I've wanted to move elsewhere for a long time, thing is I don't use nano for programming, I use it for config files. For programming I use an IDE, and every time I've tried leaving my IDE for emacs with a language server I find I just can't be bothered to set it up and learn it and make the move. Maybe because while I have some gripes with my current setup...they're very minor
I guess it's good they're dog fooding it?...I think?
Is this satire or is it from a real project O_O?
At least in macos the key you're thinking of is called command, not meta. The history of the key names is that originally the space cadet keyboard had 4 modifier keys, control, meta, super, and hyper. When emacs was originally written it was aimed at this keyboard with those modifers. When using a PC keyboard emacs often mapped meta to alt and nothing for super until the windows key was introduced by Microsoft which made it a natural option for super and so the hyper key is the only one that totally died off.