30-40% is accurate, at least in that it's difficult to measure and different organizations may have different figures. The 30-40% comes from the USDA. https://www.usda.gov/about-food/food-safety/food-loss-and-waste/food-waste-faqs

Does this imply that 53% do want data centers or was there a "no opinion" option. Unfortunately I can't read the article due to the paywall.

I don't really care for the beyond meats but I really like impossible meat. I was really excited when these alternatives finally hit stores as a good alternative to get people to eat less animal meats. While it's unfortunate that grocery bills have gone up, I'm hoping as animal meat continues to get expensive, it drives more people to try alternatives and pushes the general populace to eat less animal based foods.

Basically all grasses contain silica phytoliths but they likely don't significantly contribute to teeth wear. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0305440306001245

No, misinformation is worse.

I don't really understand how your 6 questions evaluate a growth or plateau in llm model performance. They did perform a certain way with your questions but growth has to be evaluated through the lens of time, whether literally or evaluating multiple versions of the same model.

Angela collier just uploaded a video about how embarrassing the original article is. Frankly, the situation is ridiculous and speaks to the brain rot experienced as some people become more reliant on these chatbots, regardless of how intelligent seeming some individuals may start off.

I can't speak for the UK but the restaurants I've worked in killed the lobster with a knife before boiling. The more compassionate reason was to kill them quickly before boiling, the other was that boiling them alive led to a worse tasting lobster.

There isn't a difference. If you're still functionally advancing a fascist agenda, it doesn't matter what you want to call or think of yourself, you're a fascist.