They upvote someone giving me an irrelevant link while pretending it's relevant, but they downvote the shit out of me explaining why it's not relevant. For context, the discussion was about a shell script I was trying to develop to store data in the corner of a video using QR codes.

all 33 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 18 points 4 months ago

"Do you think I'm being downvoted by bots or Nazis? It couldn't possibly be because I'm annoying as fuck!"

  • source
  • [–] 11 points 4 months ago (17 children)

    I don't thibk your post is on topic for this community. But even if it would be, without knowing the original post no one can tell why the votes are like this, though honestly I doubt you are specifically targeted by bots (excwpt you have a realllly good reason to believe so).

    As for you QR code idea, this should be relativly easy with tools like qrencode and ffmpeg

  • source
  • hideshow 17 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (13 children)

    Same. Off-topic, some bots could downvote, and the overuse of flags/emojis in the name could trigger people. Anything is possible.

    Edit: OP is very impolite in this thread, which could have been another reason for the moderation issue in the deleted post.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 13 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 4 months ago (3 children)

    Ah my client doesn't even show the emojis

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [+] [S] -11 points 4 months ago* (2 children)

    One (of three) is a Palestinian flag, they said "overuse" as a Nazi dog whistle for not liking that

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dog_whistle_(politics)

    What about you, I assume you're a Nazi too based on your initial reply?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [+] [S] -14 points 4 months ago* (8 children)

    It's on topic (literally about the place I'm posting it in, and about programming) but you want it removed. What would happen if both of you said that instead of lying? Would it be unbearable for you to handle your feelings that way instead?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 4 months ago (5 children)

    Have you considered that, perhaps, your prickly attitude and the tone of your posts is the source of the downvotes, rather than the content?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [+] [S] -12 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (4 children)

    Possibilities:

    A. The screenshot didn't load for you and you're getting way ahead of yourself making shit up presenting it as reality without loading the actual image

    B. (obvious real one) The screenshot did load for you but you're trying to gaslight me by pretending you thought it was really "prickly" or had some extreme "tone" - conflating my replies for hostile disingenuous time wasting dumbasses like you with my reply for someone who posted an irrelevant link under possibly good intentions

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 4 months ago (1 child)

    We can all click on your name and see your other comments, I suspect that’s what they’re referring to. There is a really strong correlation between the number of downvotes you received for past comments and whether or not they contain language like “fuck off retard” or similar.

    I think they hit the nail on the head, and there is no point in botting downvotes on this platform in the first place, since there is no karma.

    My client tells me I’ve downvoted you before as well, though I don’t remember where.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 5 points 4 months ago (1 child)

    Mate, I could not care less about your screenshot. I'm referring to your posts in this thread, which extends to this very reply, where you've got a generally off-putting, condescending tone and frankly, I'm glad you're getting downvoted for them, because that sort of behavior is just not something I'd like to see rewarded on the fediverse.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [+] [S] -7 points 4 months ago*

    conflating my replies for hostile disingenuous time wasting dumbasses like you with my reply for someone who posted an irrelevant link under possibly good intentions

    Do you get paid for this or are you just getting practice by trying to gaslight me?

    Didn't read past first few words either way

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 5 points 4 months ago* (1 child)

    No need to downvote me, you're wrong. You're having a moderation issue on a programming community. That's the most off-topic you can be.

    you want it removed

    I don't care about you, I don't even know you. Read again what I said: could be off-topic, emojis, etc.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [+] [S] -12 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)
    • Look at the fucking number of bullet points of rebuttals for me to make here already, what you're doing is called a "gish gallop" and anyone reading this should look that up
    • There's never need to downvote anyone, downvotes aren't driven by need, you know that and you're wasting time pretending otherwise
    • Whether downvotes are needed is a programming topic to you, but me asking about responses to my coding project isn't?
    • I'm not wrong
    • Whether I'm wrong is a programming topic to you, but me asking about responses to my coding project isn't?
    • I didn't ask if I was having a moderation issue
    • Whether I'm aware of the moderation issue I told you about is a programming topic to you, but me asking about responses to my coding project isn't?
    • I don't care if some off topic thing I didn't ask about is off topic, it doesn't make my post off topic at all unless something is wrong with your client that makes it fail to render the rest of my post (in which case even the part you're seeing is still half on-topic since it's about the place I'm posting it in)
    • I didn't ask if you care about me or think you did, you know that and you're wasting time pretending otherwise
    • Whether you care about me is a programming topic to you, but me asking about responses to my coding project isn't?
    • I didn't ask if you know me or think you did, you know that and you're wasting time pretending otherwise
    • Whether you know me is a programming topic to you, but me asking about responses to my coding project isn't?
    • I have no reason to read what you said again
  • source
  • parent
  • [+] [S] -12 points 4 months ago* (2 children)

    Read more carefully, I explained the context.

    It's weird how after complaining you couldn't understand such a short post, you gaslight me about how "good" my reasons have to be for noticing obvious things.

    Regarding the tools - currently using zint, ffmpeg, and zxing as I continue trying to do this. Was zbar instead of zxing at time of the original post.

    Idea definitely should be easy for someone with more knowledge/expertise than me, and if anyone got the idea from my removed post, they can get it done faster than me and pretend it had nothing to do with me, thanks to my post being removed. But that's totally aside from the point of whether people think it seems like bots or just regular human stupidity driving vote patterns like these.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 4 months ago (1 child)

    I have no skin in the game, I only saw this post come up in my stream. I think the reason for the downvotea aren't bots, but rather your abrasive comments. Quite frankly, you come across as a dick.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [+] [S] -7 points 4 months ago

    conflating my replies for abrasive people with me being abrasive

    also:

    conflating my replies for abrasive people with my reply for someone that posted an off-topic link under possibly good intentions

    When I tell you you come across as a dick, I'm not lying like you are when you say it to me

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 10 points 4 months ago (2 children)

    If this thread is anything to go on, people are down voting you because you come across as an insufferable asshole.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [+] [S] -6 points 4 months ago (1 child)

    conflating my replies for abrasive people with me being abrasive

    also:

    conflating my replies for abrasive people with my reply for someone that posted an off-topic link under possibly good intentions

    When I tell you you come across as an insufferable asshole, I'm not lying like you are when you say it to me

    Btw, I notice how you're incredibly obvious about your connection to the other user that just made a similar comment - that's on purpose, surely, meant to be noticed right? Another layer of the gaslighting, being incredibly obvious about fucked up harassment behaviors but knowing you can deny them while Nazi herd mentality will also deny the obviousness

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 4 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

    Your worth is not determined by abstract internet points.

    Sometimes people won't get your message/point and downvote your contributions. The reason might be you not doing a good job at communicating (in my experience, it's usually is that) or it might be them misunderstanding or you might not fit the community you are contributing to (eg. if your political view is not generally accepted in a community).

    Don't worry about one of your posts/comments occasionally getting downvoted.

    If your contributions get downvoted consinsently (which seems to be the case from what you write? I don't really are enough to go look at your account's history), consider if continuing as you are is of any benefit to you and/or the community and if it's still worth your time.

    In case, try seeing if it's a style/tone/manners/respect thing that you maybe want to improve on or if it's just not worth it and it's better to go somewhere else or stop entirely.

    There is no law saying we must fit every community (I left communities and even an entire Lemmy instance for that).

    Also, this discussion is entirely OT since it has nothing to do with programming, and I am reporting it as such. If it's downvoted or ends up being taken down (I hope so), it's not because of some conspiracy against you.

  • source
  • [–] 7 points 4 months ago* (5 children)

    You made a weird and snarky response to someone posting an encoding tool acting like it's just a proof of concept and not a working app despite the app being there for you to actually download and try, and are now wondering if you're being downvoted by Nazis and not because you're an insufferable dingus. 🙄

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [+] [S] -7 points 4 months ago* (4 children)

    I was waiting for someone to just lie and pretend the github link is more than a proof of concept. Didn't read past that part but feel free to show the thing working in the real world if you want, retard.

    The readme page doesn't even slightly imply it's designed to work in real world conditions, because it's only a proof of concept. Real world use cases are literally not even mentioned by the dev. But knock yourself out trying to showcase functionality that doesn't exist

    Inb4 you reply with either no showcase at all, or a showcase of what is definitely not real world conditions and only a proof of concept (while you continue lying about it)

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 4 months ago (3 children)

    Have you tried actually using it? Nobody should make assumptions, but you especially should stop. None of them are ever even close to reality, and you wanna claim everyone and everything is lying to you when told you're an idiot.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] [S] -3 points 4 months ago (1 child)

    The readme does not mention real world use cases

    I said I would need to see proof of it working, why the fuck would I let everyone that hates me make me spend hours doing a 10x more than needed investigation of every fucking irrelevant link they can come up with

    Showcase it working in real world conditions (you can't because it definitely doesn't) or shut the fuck up moron

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 5 points 4 months ago

    If you understood what it did, you would be able to figure out a use for it yourself. It's not that complicated. It encodes literally any data, into a video. 🤦‍♂️

    You wanna send a hidden message through a video of Rick Astley's Never Gonna Give You Up so the average person would think it's just a Rick Roll and not actually a hidden message, you could use this program.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] [S] -3 points 4 months ago*

    This github repo will make you a millionaire

    • I'm assuming you've never tried to become a millionaire before and it only takes me 2 seconds of googling to find what you're missing
    • The readme doesn't mention making you a millionaire though
    • And I won't showcase it making you a millionaire
    • But if you reply saying you would need to see proof of it working before you spend too much time digging into this, I'll say "have you actually used it? You shouldn't be making assumptions"
    • Since this is a Nazi society, I bet me mirroring your bullshit will be treated very differently by the crowd, from how they react to you bullshitting me to begin with
  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 4 months ago

    Has anyone agreed with your premise yet, or are they all still secretly conspiring to make you look like a paranoid weirdo?

  • source
  • [–] [M] 1 point 4 months ago

    This is the wrong community for these kind of posts, if you have issues you want to discuss regarding this instance, please use !meta@programming.dev. As for your complaint about DMs from our admin team, I would recommend you to send any complaints about admin behaviour as explained on our legal site

    On a different note, you have been given multiple warnings for your use of slurs, which have no place on an instance about programming. You will be given a second (and final) temporary ban of 14 days, any repeated offences will result in a permanent ban on our instance.

  • source
  • [–] 0 points 4 months ago (1 child)

    Is there a gangstalking community on the fediverse yet?

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment