all 12 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 33 points 4 months ago

Rare corporate democrat W

  • source
  • [–] 26 points 4 months ago

    Rare Pelosi W, as the kids say.

  • source
  • [–] 9 points 4 months ago

    The Blade called Pelosi “one of the most influential champions of LGBTQ rights in American politics,” recognizing, among other things, her HIV/AIDS advocacy, as well as the roles she played in passing the Matthew Shepard and James Byrd Jr. Hate Crimes Prevention Act and in repealing “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell.”

    BoOoO dEmOcRaTs SuUuuuuCk!!11

  • source
  • [+] -26 points 4 months ago (8 children)
  • [–] 49 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (5 children)
  • [–] 10 points 4 months ago* (1 child)

    I agree with dunking on the deflection, but this is more a red herring logical fallacy, which is (as the image says) presenting an irrelevant (whether true or false) subject change to avoid rebutting the argument. It could also perhaps be framed as ad hominem or appeal to hypocrisy, though neither truly fit.

    Not really a straw man fallacy, which involves presenting an intentionally weak version of a relevant core argument to easily rebut it.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment