The study examined 19 oil crops. "Three of which caused a particularly large share of the impacts: oil palm, soybean and coconut," says Shuntian Wang, a doctoral student on Pfister's team. Together, they account for some 75% of the biodiversity loss caused by oil crops.

At the same time, the study highlights a clear development: Between 1995 and 2020, biodiversity loss rose by around 80%. But this is not primarily caused by global population growth.

all 3 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 4 points 4 months ago

Palm oil, even though plant based, must be considered equally harmful as meat, eggs and dairy from a vegan standpoint.

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 4 months ago

    Ugh, is coconut oil also terrible for the local environment then, like palm oil? What a shame.

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 4 months ago

    Palms are usually hard and slow to grow due to how fast the soil nutrients get depleted by them, they also alter the soil a lot. I can't read the article but I guess the reason has something to do with it.

  • source
  • 2 comments in c/conservation@slrpnk.net view that post
    [–] 6 points 4 months ago (1 child)

    Being part Japanese, soybeans are a significant part of my diet. But looking into this a bit, it seems most of the surge in production from places like Brazil is going towards animal feed (particularly for poultry and pork). Bottom line is animal protein is expensive and environmentally impactful. Best go for the bowl of miso over the yakitori I guess?

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment