all 36 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 38 points 4 months ago (10 children)

Just make console. And then sell games for that console.

How hard can that be?

  • source
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] 52 points 4 months ago (2 children)

    Better idea: Buy tens of major companies, run them to the ground, then shut them down even if they're doing well.

    Trust me bro, a few more years of this strategy and Xbox will surely be on top!

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 13 points 4 months ago

    Buuuut how do we squeeze all the engagement out of the consumer? And keep them on reoccurring billing around the engagement? And cram in adds and last make a passable game that it all stems from. But we're not going to try too hard on that last one.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 9 points 4 months ago (3 children)

    They should have just built a gaming platform on Windows, the platform they owned. The one everyone was playing games on already.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 4 months ago (1 child)

    Why would they do that? They make more profit selling a Windows license for your PC than they ever would selling consoles.

    They’re never going to get a cut of the profits from 3rd party games on Windows the way they would with a console. The second they try to force every Windows game to pay is the second they all switch over to SteamOS.

    See, the issue is that those developers are already paying Valve to be on Steam for Windows. Paying to be on Windows as well would be double taxation, and there’s no advantage to that after Valve gave everyone an outlet (Proton) to move everyone’s libraries to Linux and SteamOS.

    So if Microsoft couldn’t charge anyone license fees to sell games for a Windows-based console, why spend all the money to develop one?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 31 points 4 months ago (3 children)

    The whole "this is an Xbox" stuff just shows how lost they are...

    That and buying Activision Blizzard for 70 billion :/

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 4 months ago (2 children)

    They've already stopped that and fired the CEO whose idea that was.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 27 points 4 months ago (7 children)

    Unrelated to the content, but:

    And it is safe to say he not exactly sound convinced that Microsoft’s gaming leadership known what it is doing.

    That's 2 or 3 errors in the second sentence of the article posted a day ago. They have editors, right!?

  • source
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 4 months ago (3 children)

    Why coherent sentences adequate with the grammer used in text when you can just slapped words together to made points?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 13 points 4 months ago (1 child)

    Former PlayStation boss Shawn Layden has shared his thoughts on Xbox’s latest round of struggles and identity crises. And it is safe to say he not exactly sound convinced that Microsoft’s gaming leadership known what it is doing.

    Layden recently responded to a post on LinkedIn from game designer and consultant Tadhg Kelly, who shared multiple decisions from the company that showed how it is stuck in an identity crises made worse by contradictory messaging, executive changes, financial pressure, studio closures, and repeated promises of a reset that might not work the way they hope it would.

    At the risk of sounding like a ‘hater’ (which, I’m really not), the moves evince a basic misunderstanding of how the interactive entertainment world moves, Layden wrote. IYKYK, which also means if you don’t you don’t.

    Fairly brutal assessment I would say.

    And coming from someone who once ran PlayStation and gave the company some of the most successful years. Layden is not just questioning one bad decision from Microsoft but whether the people running Xbox actually understand how the gaming business works. Harsh thing to say but at point it is a fair question to ask; do they even know what they are doing? Plethora of people are about to lose their jobs because of the decisions made by Xbox leadership.

    The comment arrives at an especially awkward moment for Microsoft’s gaming business. Asha Sharma took over as CEO of Microsoft Gaming in February following Phil Spencer’s retirement, promising urgency, clarity, and a return to the “renegade spirit” that originally built Xbox. Since then, the company has been talking openly about resetting a business that Sharma reportedly described as being “not in a healthy spot.”

    Xbox has warned its employees that its current financial direction cannot continue. Microsoft CEO recently state that they need to make Xbox a sustainable business, and in an internal memo Asha Sharma revealed that her division has fallen to a measly 3% accountability margin.

    Now, reports claim a major layoff wave is about to his Xbox studios once Microsoft’s fiscal year ends on June 30th. Internal discussions around turning Xbox into a wholly owned subsidiary or spinning off the business are reported in the media as well.

    None of that means Sharma caused Xbox’s problems. She inherited a division shaped by years of acquisitions, shifting platform strategies, declining console sales, canceled projects, and damaged morale. It appears as if she was given the keys to a fallen kingdom and asked to rebuild it with little to no resources but all the blame if things fall apart completely.

    Sharma is now responsible for convincing employees and players that this “reset” is not just a corporate rebrand followed by a round of job cuts. That is where Layden’s comment hits hardest. Xbox keeps saying it understands the problem. A former PlayStation boss is suggesting the decisions themselves prove otherwise.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 9 points 4 months ago (2 children)

    Says the guys who have lost over a half billion dollars chasing Fortnite money with nothing to show for it

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 4 months ago

    microsoft 'lost their way' years ago in their relentless pursuit of profit.

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 4 months ago (2 children)

    Although PlayStation is definitely doing way better than Xbox right now, let's not pretend they're making a whole ton of great decisions over there.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 4 months ago

    The Mythbusters fiasco woke me up to how easily I could lose my digital library on Playstation. Got myself completely removed from that ecosystem before I threw away any more money on rental games with store bought prices.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] -2 points 4 months ago (3 children)

    Says the guy who won't release PS games on PC, the most common gaming platform?

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 4 months ago

    At least one thing Xbox is getting right is its “Play Anywhere” licensing. I bought FH6 and I love the fact that I can play it on my Xbox in the living room, or on my PC in the office and functionally there’s no difference (except online being free with PC, but that’s another story). They learned that it’s not about the platform, but the games.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 3 points 4 months ago

    At least domestically in Japan, PC gaming is still a very niche and expensive hobby. It's cheaper than a decade ago when I got here, but computer literacy isn't great. I hate that decision, but it makes sense for their domestic market

  • source
  • parent