Technology

[–] WhyJiffie@sh.itjust.works 1 point 4 months ago

what about both?

parent

[+] MangoCats@feddit.it 2 points 4 months ago (1 child)

[removed by mod]

parent

[–] WhyJiffie@sh.itjust.works 0 points 4 months ago

false equivalence. that's like saying in defense of war crimes, sue the weapons and war vehicles, and see how they defend themselves in court.

parent

[+] MangoCats@feddit.it 2 points 4 months ago (1 child)

[removed by mod]

parent

[–] WhyJiffie@sh.itjust.works 1 point 4 months ago*

because the point of my example is that neither case works like that. you can't sue weapons, you sue those who commanded their use. you can't sue transistors.. and what does that mean? it means you sue those that commanded the use of AI assisted weapons.

common sense, really.

parent

[+] MangoCats@feddit.it 1 point 4 months ago (1 child)

[removed by mod]

parent

[–] WhyJiffie@sh.itjust.works 1 point 4 months ago

I read this as implying whwt I say does not make sense:

Sue a transistor, see how it conducts itself.

parent

[+] MangoCats@feddit.it 1 point 4 months ago (1 child)

[removed by mod]

parent

[–] WhyJiffie@sh.itjust.works 1 point 4 months ago

B - who in their right mind would think that a transistor is a legitimate target of a lawsuit?

someone who wants to intentionally misunderstand the situation, wrecking the discussion. I'm not saying you did that, but it's not rare on forums like this.

parent

load more comments (-2 replies)

[–] Nioxic@lemmy.dbzer0.com -2 points 4 months ago (5 children)

We can kinda guarantee that future wars will be fought with bots, ai and drones etc

Fewer humans will be killed in theory

Of course then the winner is just who can make the most drones

But i do prefer bots and drones dying, over humans. I mean chemical weapons are already illegal in war and russia still use it.. need to fight fire with hotter fire

hideshow 5 child comments

[–] JustEnoughDucks@slrpnk.net 21 points 4 months ago (1 child)

It will be robots sent to kill humans, whether by another country or the country on its own citizens.

Robots killing robots is just damage to capital which the elites will make sure is not the path forward.

parent

[–] justaman123@lemmy.world 1 point 4 months ago

I mean bombs are made to blow up so constantly having reasons to blow up means there's reasons to keep on making money off the bomb factories. So it props up the military industrial complex

parent

[–] chuckleslord@lemmy.world 7 points 4 months ago

This is a complete misread of what this means. Drones are used to kill people, not other drones. Drones are last priority targets in basically all cases except for strategic defensive positions. This switch means more death at the hands of less (or no) people. It's like arguing that nukes are good because they're so destructive that they'll end war. Which is the opposite of what they did, wars just became proxy wars in an attempt to drain your adversary of resources, instead of direct conflict to stop them. We have more international conflict now than at any point in human history. This will make that even worse.

parent

[–] sanitation@lemmy.today [S] 1 point 4 months ago (1 child)

Where do u see chemical weapons used in Ukraine?

parent