WhyJiffie comments on Over 200 organizations call for a ban on "artificial intelligence" in military kill chains

Technology

89,597 readers

13,793 active

3,105 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

Follow the lemmy.world rules.
Only tech related news or articles.
Be excellent to each other!
Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
Politics threads may be removed.
No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots

founded 3 years ago

moderators

[–] WhyJiffie@sh.itjust.works 0 points 4 months ago

false equivalence. that's like saying in defense of war crimes, sue the weapons and war vehicles, and see how they defend themselves in court.

permalink

fedilink

source

parent

[+] MangoCats@feddit.it 2 points 4 months ago (1 child)

[removed by mod]

permalink

fedilink

source

parent

hideshow 1 child comment

[–] WhyJiffie@sh.itjust.works 1 point 4 months ago*

because the point of my example is that neither case works like that. you can't sue weapons, you sue those who commanded their use. you can't sue transistors.. and what does that mean? it means you sue those that commanded the use of AI assisted weapons.

common sense, really.

permalink

fedilink

source

parent

[+] MangoCats@feddit.it 1 point 4 months ago (1 child)

[removed by mod]

permalink

fedilink

source

parent

hideshow 1 child comment

[–] WhyJiffie@sh.itjust.works 1 point 4 months ago

I read this as implying whwt I say does not make sense:

Sue a transistor, see how it conducts itself.

permalink

fedilink

source

parent

[+] MangoCats@feddit.it 1 point 4 months ago (1 child)

[removed by mod]

permalink

fedilink

source

parent

hideshow 1 child comment

[–] WhyJiffie@sh.itjust.works 1 point 4 months ago

B - who in their right mind would think that a transistor is a legitimate target of a lawsuit?

someone who wants to intentionally misunderstand the situation, wrecking the discussion. I'm not saying you did that, but it's not rare on forums like this.