This guy gets it.

Sounds like you're just gonna roll over and accept it, lol.

To elloborate: If all Americans were to cut thier power at the same exact time (or as close to same time as possible,) the power grid would not be able to handle it. How is it different than a power outage? In an outage powrr fails to route to where power is wanted. Even in these sanarios if too much power is shunted to a spot due to power trying find a spot to go, it pops transformers or other power grid equipment. Now imagine it on a mass scale. A Simi dosent stop just because it ran out of road. Why this would work: In the past there were efforts to turn off the lights at an exact time for eco reasons. Like : "lights off at 10pm to save energy!" they were told that it is OK to do this BUT they had to turn off lights and power GRADUALLY because of the effect I said above. Thus, if we all power off our homes, or all our lights at the same time, we could damage the grid.

Why did I include this in post? we need a bargaining chip. We need a credible real threat to fight back.

It's hard to get people to go outside with a gun. it's hard to get people to outside and hunt down the ultra rich. It's even hard for people to protest because they don't have time to do it because they must survive.

But it is easy to get everyone to turn off a light. Even the ones who don't touch grass can turn off a light switch. If they can like a post, they can flip a switch. It's even easy to get the "non-political" people to go along with this because we can just tell them it's an eco effort or something.

Risk factors: If Americans actually do it: it will knock out power for several months. (up side it forces all of us to replace equipment that probobly needed to be) if it succeededs. If the us government and energy companies counter by preping for the sudden stop, the meters will still be running thus giving a physical way to measure how many people are protesting. So even if the "attack" fails, the power companies can see how pissed we are and thus report it to the local government which then reports to federal. So even if it "fails" the fact that we're willing to try shows how upset we Americans are in a way they cannot ignore. It shows we are looking for ways to take our power back by force.

But I say if they want us to go back in time why not go even further?

But what of the innocent that need power to survive? 2 responses: 1. Should of thought about that before becoming a facisit nation. 2. The current regime said "empathy is weakness." just following the example set by our "great" leaders.

How are the "kill the rich" statement and this are connected: When there is no power, there are no cameras. Cameras powered by solar can be removed. No cameras means no ability to track crimes. Now we can use techniques that are more overt, like raiding the ultra-riches home. Why not just attack thier homes directly? No power means no cell signal, no way to track people before they get there. Historical context; if we had cameras back in the civil rights movement back country cops and kkk members would had more trouble Lynching people they didn't like. The reverse is also true. No witnesses, no crime.

But more importantly: it's a mutually assured distruction tactic, they can't rule over something that is destroyed and in chaos. And like I said, we will stop this regime BY ANY MEANS NECESSARY.

Why the date and time: we need to do this before power companies spend most of the generator budget on Ai centers. right now it mostly serves homes and businesses, if we break the current equipment power companies will have to choose between serving the population or serving the Ai overlords. Power companies hire the most working class of working class to do thier work, so .. Might be hard to convince them to serve the Ai overlord over thier families.

I think this gets it all.. If not I will explain further.

Sure thing. If all Americans were to cut thier power at the same exact time (or as close to same time as possible,) the power grid would not be able to handle it. How is it different than a power outage? In an outage powrr fails to route to where power is wanted. Even in these sanarios if too much power is shunted to a spot due to power trying find a spot to go, it pops transformers or other power grid equipment. Now imagine it on a mass scale. A Simi dosent stop just because it ran out of road. Why this would work: In the past there were efforts to turn off the lights at an exact time for eco reasons. Like : "lights off at 10pm to save energy!" they were told that it is OK to do this BUT they had to turn off lights and power GRADUALLY because of the effect I said above. Thus, if we all power off our homes, or all our lights at the same time, we could damage the grid.

Why did I include this in post? we need a bargaining chip. We need a credible real threat to fight back.

It's hard to get people to go outside with a gun. it's hard to get people to outside and hunt down the ultra rich. It's even hard for people to protest because they don't have time to do it because they must survive.

But it is easy to get everyone to turn off a light. Even the ones who don't touch grass can turn off a light switch. If they can like a post, they can flip a switch. It's even easy to get the "non-political" people to go along with this because we can just tell them it's an eco effort or something.

Risk factors: If Americans actually do it: it will knock out power for several months. (up side it forces all of us to replace equipment that probobly needed to be) if it succeededs. If the us government and energy companies counter by preping for the sudden stop, the meters will still be running thus giving a physical way to measure how many people are protesting. So even if the "attack" fails, the power companies can see how pissed we are and thus report it to the local government which then reports to federal. So even if it "fails" the fact that we're willing to try shows how upset we Americans are in a way they cannot ignore. It shows we are looking for ways to take our power back by force.

But I say if they want us to go back in time why not go even further?

But what of the innocent that need power to survive? 2 responses: 1. Should of thought about that before becoming a facisit nation. 2. The current regime said "empathy is weakness." just following the example set by our "great" leaders.

How are the "kill the rich" statement and this are connected: When there is no power, there are no cameras. Cameras powered by solar can be removed. No cameras means no ability to track crimes. Now we can use techniques that are more overt, like raiding the ultra-riches home. Why not just attack thier homes directly? No power means no cell signal, no way to track people before they get there. Historical context; if we had cameras back in the civil rights movement back country cops and kkk members would had more trouble Lynching people they didn't like. The reverse is also true. No witnesses, no crime.

But more importantly: it's a mutually assured distruction tactic, they can't rule over something that is destroyed and in chaos. And like I said, we will stop this regime BY ANY MEANS NECESSARY.

Why the date and time: we need to do this before power companies spend most of the generator budget on Ai centers. right now it mostly serves homes and businesses, if we break the current equipment power companies will have to choose between serving the population or serving the Ai overlords. Power companies hire the most working class of working class to do thier work, so .. Might be hard to convince them to serve the Ai overlord over thier families.

I think this gets it all.. If not I will explain further.

FBI feels like a company HR department. They're there to protect national and politicians' interests, not the public's.

1000000000000000%

The only difference is in the packaging and presentation.

Or apparently diddling children