top 44 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 27 points 4 months ago

There used to be a lot more public open source companies but a lot of them were bought out. Sun Microsystems, Novell, Silicon Graphics, RedHat, Caldera, Oracle, etc. all are or were companies that made open source software and were publicly traded.

  • source
  • [–] 26 points 4 months ago

    This could lead to an early demise of Linux Mint. It's great we have LMDE ready

  • source
  • [–] 67 points 4 months ago* (12 children)
    1. Take Debian
    2. Make it worse
    3. ???
    4. IPO

    It would be nice if the most of the money went into things that would help the linux ecosystem (I know canonical contributes to debian, sometimes makes usability improvements, and isn't all negative). But it'll probably just go into AI bullshit.

  • source
  • hideshow 12 child comments
  • [–] 20 points 4 months ago (4 children)

    When Canonical partnered with Microsoft to work on WSL, I figured Caninical was gaining something too: like tips how to license and sell Ubuntu instead of being free.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 4 months ago (6 children)

    The second argument is false... How it's worse? It's definitely different... They did some user friendly improvements, for people who are not want barebones Linux. They take care of the most stuff you need, so you can focus on your work. Before you came with snap argument. Think how much it's matter for normal user how they installing software? If they want JetBrains IDE, just go into store and install JetBrains IDE. Ubuntu was and will be for user who don't care and want their system to work. They even implemented Dock and systray for GNOME, so people can use system as it's normal even on GNOME xd

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 14 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (5 children)

    Im one of those people that's still pissed off about when they had amazon ads in the OS by default. Even though it was like 10 years ago. Like, id hit the wondows button and start typing "firefox" and see an ad for a firepit from amazon.

    Oh yeah, then i went back to it ~5 years ago until the snap packages pissed me off too much

    Debian is much easier now than it was 15 years ago, and some of that is thanks to canonical. Im not actually anti ubuntu, but they will always make weird choices to annoy people like me

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 4 months ago* (2 children)

    You can't satisfy every person on the planet xd There are always people with different view on different things... Amazon ads were 10+ years ago.... Snaps still but not everyone hates it. I don't for example. Canonical is a corporation which trying to make money. Of course. But at least they are doing it keeping Ubuntu free, and survive in this world where you can't do nothing without money. FOSS people basically pays nothing for things they are using. So it's nothing wrong Canonical trying to monetize their work.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 4 months ago (1 child)

    Critical support of Ubuntu is my position lol

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 4 months ago

    You can love it or hate. Nothing wrong with it xd Every people have their own opinions on different things. That's a reason why not every one can be satisfied :) The good is that, we have more distros than people actually using it xd So everyone can find his own home :)

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 4 points 4 months ago

    Snaps are unironically a good packaging format and it would be best for majority of users to be using them. Stronger sandboxing than flatpack, auto updating by default(huge for user security), easier for developers to package their apps.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 4 months ago

    Thankfully I missed the amazon ads.

    If only snap worked as well as flatpak. Not one snap package I have installed (Kubuntu) has worked, even the snap FF went wonky within 3 days of a fresh distro install. Flatpak works better as I have not had a single issue with any flatpak install (I refuse to look at how big these files are) I just like the idea of sand boxing all these apps. As of now my preferred install is 1. flatpak, 2. .deb, 3. compile the bitch from source, the only one I have had to compile was the "Drivers" for my and my gfs G13 keyboards so we could assign the keys we want.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 40 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (10 children)

    Well, Mint could just fall back to LMDE if Ubuntu starts going in the same direction as RHEL and starts account-walling their source code and blocking redistribution under the penalty of an account ban, but I don't know about other Ubuntu clones.

  • source
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [+] [S] 5 points 4 months ago (8 children)
  • [–] 23 points 4 months ago (7 children)

    Kde is building their own non ubuntu Linux distro, pretty cool imo

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [+] [S] 3 points 4 months ago (6 children)
  • [–] 16 points 4 months ago (4 children)

    Note that KDE Linux is completely different from Neon:

    • Arch-based
    • Immutable
      • /usr is a read-only, atomically updated erofs volume backed by a single file, allowing rollback to any of the last 5 OS images
      • No system package management allowed, only Flatpak, AppImage, distrobox, etc

    I love the direction they're going with it, but I personally won't be running it because I like to tinker.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 4 months ago (2 children)

    https://linux.kde.org/#what-kind-of-base-technology-does-kde-linux-use

    They disagree with calling it arch based:

    What kind of base technology does KDE Linux use?

    KDE Linux is an “immutable base OS” Linux distro created using Arch Linux packages, but it should not be considered an “Arch-based distro”; Arch is simply a means to an end, and KDE Linux doesn’t even ship with the pacman package manager.

    KDE Linux leans on Systemd for a great deal of functionality. Updates are atomic and image-based, with the last 5 OS images cached on disk. Only the Wayland session is supported. Apps primarily come from Flatpak.

    Learn more about KDE Linux’s architecture.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 4 months ago (1 child)

    They can disagree, but if I take your recipe and then change it, no matter how much, my starting point is still based on your recipe….

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 4 months ago

    Absolutely, it looks like it's mostly managing expectations that come with calling something arch based.

    In your recipe analogy, calling your new cookie recipe, which you based on your granny's chocolate chip cookie recipe, "chocolate chip cookie based", but ending up with a raisin cookie (you removed the chocolate chips) would be false advertising, even if technically true in the way you describe.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • [–] 14 points 4 months ago

    Probably very little, its like how rehl being a commercial product doesn't mean fedora isn't open source. In the absolute worst case scenario distros can switch their base to Debian unstable.

  • source
  • [–] 14 points 4 months ago

    Affect other distros?

    Hopefully, they'll all get something better then cloud-init.

    Canonical pumps out dumb stuff.

  • source
  • [–] 28 points 4 months ago (2 children)

    Ubuntu was a critical part of the Linux ecosystem for many years. It is probably the first distro of many of us (myself included).

    But last ~10 years have not been kind to Canonical. They are losing ground everywhere, and they are no longer the engine of Linux adoption that they used to be. Others have taken over.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 12 points 4 months ago (1 child)

    I always felt like Canonical had a big problem with going all-in on something they thought was neat (the Unity desktop, Mir, that thing where phones and desktops were supposed to merge, now Snaps) and letting everything else stagnate, then getting the thing they were working on to the point where it was almost good, then dumping it and going after the next shiny thing.

    But yeah these days I think things like Pop!OS and Mint are better Ubuntus than Ubuntu is.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 13 points 4 months ago

    It won't. Well. Perhaps some distros might see new users/customers when everyone's abandoning Ubuntu.

  • source
  • [–] 18 points 4 months ago

    Snap is like the IE of the Linux world but worse (IE at least installs <INSERT_BROWSER_HERE>). Nothing is lost.

  • source
  • [–] 8 points 4 months ago

    Oh no! Anyway …

  • source
  • [–] 12 points 4 months ago (6 children)

    More money into Linux? Probably a good thing in the grand scheme of things. I'd avoid Ubuntu though.

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [+] [S] 2 points 4 months ago (5 children)
  • [–] 6 points 4 months ago*

    Going public just means that the shares will be traded on a public market (stock market) rather than being held privately. So anyone who wants to buy shares can. There are some legal requirements to be publicly traded, largely regarding public disclosure of finances and assets.

    The major difference would be that suddenly anyone who wants to have a say in how they are run can buy shares, and if they buy enough shares, they can pressure leadership in to making decisions they would not have otherwise made. also, people buying the shares probably will want to see their shares increase in value, and thus leadership will be pressured to please the stock market hive mind. Potentially it opens them up to a hostile takeover where some outside group buys up enough shares to replaces the leadership with people they want in charge.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 5 points 4 months ago

    Probably won't hit Arch too hard.

  • source
  • [–] 8 points 4 months ago

    It's not as if Canonical hasn't already enshittified. I don't think going public is going to change that much.

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 4 months ago

    I’m out of the loop, canonical is IPOing?

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 4 months ago

    For a company whose main product is developing and supporting linux the ipo is the first step to being bought.

    What does this mean? The same thing that it meant for other linux companies, except the brand is not worth preserving because it’s toxic.

    What effect will this have on other distros? See red hat.

  • source