It’s really bad. Like, nearly unwatchable.

Hey Gemini, in the style of the 2012 movie Battleship, create a screenplay based on the board game Hungry Hungry Hippos.

Like the Queens Gambit but checkers would be hilarious

Yes, they work in the line "they're not gonna sink this battleship!". When you're committed to this absurd premise, you pretty much have to say it.

I like it. It's like junk food, you know it's bad, but it's still nice when you get the craving for something bad.

Just watch the Andrew Lloyd Webber theather version. It's by far the best.

I think Christopher Robin and maleficent were good. As long as they're telling a new story it's fun to see the old characters. When it's just the exact same plot but a little darker and live action over animation it's so dumb. Our CGI just ain't good enough to justify that.

They're remaking Moana already, and still a new movie, relative.

I hated aladdin, the monkey and parrot were two of the best characters and without the comically over-the-top 'acting' they are completely different characters.

They shouldn't be allowed to take out a trademark on public domain characters.

And the only IP of any note we got out of it is :: checks my notes:: a Winnie the Pooh slasher pic.....

Especially the Spielberg sequel... After the success of the first movie, Crighton wrote a Lost World novel as a sequel to the FILM, not the first book.

Spielberg jettisoned the book and did his own sequel instead. :(

I really wanted to see the chameleon dinosaurs on film.

Lost World was alright, 3 was meh. The rest are a big bag of:

It honestly was fine for a kids movie. The story was so generic that it was impossible to mess up and would work with any character/setting.

I was disappointed with how boring it was. They should’ve leaned way more into the emoji aspect.

FWIW I much prefer Sony's Spider-Man over Disney's.

i first heard of kraven from the game, spiderman instead of the movie, i think the GAME cutscenes are better than the movie.

John Carter suffered from an awful title.

"Princess of Mars," would have resonated better with marketing. And is actually one of the book titles.

Neither of those movies were really all that terrible. I enjoyed John Carter. But clearly they didn't connect with audiences.

I must be on my own. I know John Carter flopped phenomenally, but I really liked it. Thought it was a great movie. Was very annoyed when I found out that there may never be a 2nd. Even if there was, at this stage it is very unlikely to be the same cast. IIRC, a lot of the blame was on Disney marketing. But IDK about these things.

I did some digging and apparently Waterworld somehow broke even. I remember a lot of the hype around the film at the time was wanting to see if it was really as bad as people said it was.

Did we watch the same movie? I marathoned all the films and Dial of Destiny is dire. To be honest, only the first film is truly great. I'd probably rank them 1, 3, 4, 2, 5.

Is it worth watching though?
I couldn't sit through Grandpa Pants and his Crystal Skull.

That's literally why it was my choice. It's one of the biggest budget films ever... and also one of the biggest flops ever.

I think it was Prime's Theater where I learnt that for the Smaug fight scene for movie 2, they planed the set the night before, painted the next morning, filmed, and the paint was still wet when the sets were taken down.