1 comment

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 11 points 5 months ago

Burner phones aren't just for drug dealers anymore. Every shady website that wants a phone number gets my burner number. I haven't gotten a single spam call in years.

  • source
  • 38 comments in c/news@lemmy.world view that post
    [–] 95 points 5 months ago (5 children)

    This is just going to mean more phone theft and phone sales going underground. This hurts regular privacy conscious people and changes nothing for criminals.

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 38 points 5 months ago (1 child)

    Yeah.

    Need a burner phone? But a used one with a fake name on eBay.

    SMS and phone calls are basically dead anyways, I can easily spin up an encrypted service anyways, and run it off public wifi networks.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (-1 replies)
  • [–] 46 points 5 months ago (1 child)

    The FCC is proposing the data collection partly as a way to combat scammers

    Lol, that'll never happen, it's just part of the domestic surveillance network.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 28 points 5 months ago

    Had my google phone stolen internationally. Called google about it and they said "we can't do anything to brick your phone." I have an old pixel 6a that ws bricked due to the battery and a security patch they pushed.

    Funny how things only work in their favor.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 38 points 5 months ago (1 child)

    How about just start with shutting down phone number spoofing. Thanks.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 35 points 5 months ago

    Well that should make it easy to identify and shut down/block the call spam farms.

    What's that? They don't give a flying fuck about it? Huh, neat.

  • source
  • [–] 26 points 5 months ago (2 children)

    "Kill burner phones" makes it sound like the only people who don't want to sign up for their phone plan using their id are criminals

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 19 points 5 months ago

    Oh my, another dystopian fucking thing happening. And its only the 8000th one this week!

  • source
  • [–] 52 points 5 months ago* (2 children)

    Control vehicle operability and thus mobility.
    Control use of electronic devices, and thus It's empowerment.
    Observe all behavior, external and internal, to know and predict behavior.
    Remove privacy and anonymity, to target individuals.
    Track relationships, to know all associations and idea propagation.
    View all 3d printed designs, to steal concepts and monitor use.
    Eliminate wealth and ownership, to disempower the masses.

    All of this is happening right now. What kind of society does this sound like?

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [+] 13 points 5 months ago (8 children)
  • [–] 22 points 5 months ago (7 children)

    I think you can still but prepaid phones at department/electronics stores. Not everyone needs or wants a monthly bill.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 5 months ago (5 children)

    tracfone you just buy the phone and cards and you apply the cards to the phone number. never have to put any personal information.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 5 months ago (3 children)

    Where is this? Because Tracphone is Verizon, now, and even under Carlos Slim, required name and address in the USA.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 25 points 5 months ago

    With all of the other privacy related crackdowns that have been popular recently, I just assumed that the government already figured out an easy way to identify burner phone users. It's surprising that it took them this long if that's not the case.

  • source
  • [–] 20 points 5 months ago*

    Sounds like a ridiculous crackdown on privacy that will do abso-fucking-lutely nothing to actually stop spammers, grifters, or other criminals.

  • source
  • [–] 10 points 5 months ago*

    I am seriously ready to ditch my phone all together and just have a land line.

    I am required to use the phone my employer provides me and on my days off it is off too and in my desk.

  • source
  • [–] 13 points 5 months ago

    Anyone feel like all this surveillance is leading up to something?

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 5 months ago (4 children)

    Seems like Google Voice plus public wifi would still allow one to make calls/text without any id associated with it.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [+] -4 points 5 months ago (1 child)
  • 35 comments in c/technology@lemmy.world view that post
    [–] 93 points 5 months ago (1 child)

    Including government contracts right? ICE will put a ID on file for each device right? Right?

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 59 points 5 months ago (11 children)

    They did this in Hong Kong already. Everyone still gets spam. People who make a living off of this will find a way.

  • source
  • hideshow 11 child comments
  • [–] 87 points 5 months ago (6 children)

    Has nothing to do with spam and everything to know who you are. Spammers don't use "burner phones".

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 17 points 5 months ago (5 children)

    yes, I know, I'm just pointing out that it won't even work on its supposed intended goal lol

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 5 months ago (2 children)

    I literally never get spam calls. NEVER.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 5 months ago (1 child)

    you're in the wrong country then lol

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 5 months ago

    No I'm not. I'd hate getting spam calls.

    Doesn't matter where I go to, though. I've had this phone number since like 96 and it's always been non-listed, so commercial services can't get it unless I give it to them.

    I had some calls for a gym membership a few years after I drunkenly put it into some lottery or another but I told them there's a marketing ban on the number and they gave up.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 30 points 5 months ago (2 children)

    Spam was never done with "burner phones" in the first place, it's mostly done via VoIP through shady telecoms companies that can't be bothered to validate their customers. Due to the age of the phone system it's incredibly easy to spoof phone numbers because it's essentially a trust system. Phone exchange A talks to exchange B and says phone number 123 is calling number 456. How does exchange B know that it's actually 123 calling? They don't at all, they just trust that exchange A is telling the truth. It's really hard to get into the system, but once you're there you essentially have unlimited power with virtually no safeguards in place.

    Basically from a security perspective the phone system looks a lot like the 1980s internet, there is technically some security in place, but significantly less than there actually should be.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 5 months ago

    One of the things that surprised me the most when I started working on vishings for a Cybersecurity Red Team was how extremely easy it is to spoof any phone number.

    It's the nunber one tip I give to anyone who asks about security, a lot of people don't know that, and spear-vishings are extremely effective.

    People have learned to mostly not trust Microsoft Support numbers asking for your CC, but when an internal company number that your phone matches to your bosses boss calls you, a lot of people fall for that.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 25 points 5 months ago (1 child)

    "We never thought that would happen here."

    When will they learn lmao.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 3 points 5 months ago

    Note how the government isn't going after gun ownership as vehemently as they are digital privacy. They know that it doesn't matter how many guns the people have, if they can't communicate anonymously (or at all), then any sort of uprising will be small and easily quashed.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 23 points 5 months ago (1 child)

    and physical address

    Can homeless people not get phones under this proposal? Not that they give a shit about homeless people, but it is a valid concern.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 20 points 5 months ago (1 child)

    If they do this I'm going to go VoIP only it'll be a pain. It's so absurd the oligarchy corpos are pushing for as many business to collect all the user ID photos they can. With all the data leaks that happen it's only going to be a matter of time before stealing someones ID is as easy as stealing anyones ssn. Things will be less secure not more

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 17 points 5 months ago

    We never thought that would happen here.

    I keep hearing this from many people who are having the day they voted for.

  • source
  • [–] 28 points 5 months ago

    Suddenly voip services will be the new hotness.

  • source
  • [–] 13 points 5 months ago

    They will require you to provide an alternate phone number in order to get a cellular service? So you can't get a phone number unless you already have a phone number?

  • source
  • [+] 8 points 5 months ago (5 children)
  • [–] 5 points 5 months ago (2 children)

    My first thought was; are burner phones still a thing somewhere?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 5 months ago

    At least jmp.chat still has Canadian numbers

  • source
  • [–] -2 points 5 months ago (1 child)

    How many crimes were committed with burner phones?

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] -5 points 5 months ago (2 children)

    It looks like a conspiracy theorist site, and the article comes across as, but both are legit.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • 10 comments in c/hackernews@lemmy.bestiver.se view that post
    [–] 14 points 5 months ago (6 children)

    Probably not actually impossible, just requiring identity theft so only available to criminals

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 5 months ago (5 children)

    Time to buy stock in non traditional voip services.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (4 children)

    DM when you establish a public no logs PBX.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 5 months ago* (3 children)

    Asterisk behind FreePBX.

    https://computingforgeeks.com/secure-asterisk-freepbx-voip-fraud/

    Sure there's logging but it's only incoming to one number, set your friends up to use your FreePBX, wash through another FreePBX and make sure to setup random calls to internal spoofed numbers between the two at truly random intervals (temp diffs, barometric, Fourier plots of random youtubes)

    If you really want I could DM you this setup.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 5 months ago (2 children)

    No comrade. I need piccolo or you to dogfood a public no log PBX for as many people as you can bandwidth. Then DM me beta testing invites.
    I can't even afford a prepaid SIM.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 5 months ago

    so fucking sick of this fascist gov

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 5 months ago

    A real criminal would have a router with a programmable imei

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 5 months ago

    Well can we get all companies IDs so that we know who's calling? Not that it matters, I already disabled that app. I don't need an app that allows just anyone from any country to call me and say they need crypto.

  • source
  • 3 comments in c/privacy@lemmy.world view that post
    [–] 38 points 5 months ago

    Ahhh yes, the telcos, all of whom have lost all their customer information many times over with no real consequences, but those same people have had their credit ruined. This cant go wrong letting them have copies of peoples IDs which now will have their signature on record so that convincing IDs can be made from.

  • source
  • [–] 15 points 5 months ago (1 child)

    Would Voice over IP services be the solution to this? Or do those require ID too?

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 15 points 5 months ago*

    They would be unaffected, I would imagine. Especially if you are not using cell towers for cellular data (so no SIM/eSIM would be needed in the phone period).

    Signal already works well for my family for communication.

  • source
  • parent
  • 2 comments in c/usa@lemmy.ml view that post
    [–] 8 points 5 months ago (1 child)