all 19 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 35 points 5 months ago (3 children)

Inaccurate headline. The bill doesn't ban web scraping, it just requires that bots accurately identify themselves through the user agent string, and maybe some additional requirements to disclose the purpose of scraping the data.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 5 months ago (2 children)

    And there's a fine if the company doesn't comply which is basically now gonna be considered the cost of doing business

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 5 months ago (1 child)

    That’s still a win. Make the act less lucrative. Fewer entremenureial types to take after it.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 5 months ago

    Oh I'm not saying it's not better than doing nothing. I'm just saying I'm still disatisfied with the results because of the socio economic implications of businesses being treated legally like people.

    I agree with you though.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 24 points 5 months ago (7 children)

    How will they enforce it? Pretty please?

  • source
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] [S] 19 points 5 months ago (6 children)

    The New York measure defines a stealth crawler as any software that retrieves, scrapes or otherwise accesses a website, including AI agents. Under the bill, the attorney general’s office would be able to sue companies that fail to disclose such activity. Violations could net civil penalties of up to $15,000 per day.

    🤔

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 5 months ago (2 children)

    Soooo, that means archive.is too. This fucking sucks.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 5 months ago*

    I hope those tools are exempt because, just like a browser, they respond only to specific commands issued by a human user. They don't "crawl" pages in the way we describe bots that jump from page to page.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 15 points 5 months ago (1 child)

    The only bots I hope gets exempt are Internet Archive bots. Only bots I support.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 9 points 5 months ago*

    Honestly, I would love if forced ident was required. but archival services need a hard exemption from being blocked as well.

  • source
  • [–] 7 points 5 months ago

    Why only news sites?

    Any bot that ignores robots.txt should be banned.

  • source
  • [–] 6 points 5 months ago (2 children)

    Realistically what good would it do once you already had scraped the pattern of news sites it's already over. All this is doing in actuality is preventing new start ups from competing in the ai space. so really this is the fastest enshitification world record of a medium. Whether you like or hate ai this is actually an enshitification of it. ( I hate ai.)

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 5 months ago

    I'm guessing it's to eliminate the issue of a site not getting clicks because the article you were about to read is already summarized for you. It also opens the door for revenue negotiations for allowing their content to be scraped for that purpose, as the scraper bots would now be identified.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 0 points 5 months ago

    What are you on about?

    For AI purposes the really useful part of a news site is the actual news - you know, the stuff that changes practically every minute - not the "structure" of the site.

    These news sites aren't being scraped for training data anymore but to provide near-realtime up to date information to the models.

    Meaning e.g. Gemini can scan your news article, extract the useful information for the user, and deliver it to the user, without them ever going to your news site and providing the interaction that at the end of the day is converted to money - money your site needs to run.

  • source
  • parent