all 99 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 21 points 5 months ago (4 children)

I loved proton years ago... even did a paid account for a while. This isn't their first wtf moment and won't be their last. The problem for me, its that I expect more carefulness and thoughtfulness from a company that promotes encryption and privacy.

Showing me how easily you make mistakes is a quick way for me to question how well you're safeguarding the platform.

I've moved away. Will take some time for them to earn back the trust, but honestly... I don't see a huge need for them anymore. I simply don't consider email secure. If you want real secure communication (that you can host on a server yourself) Matrix and XMPP are a much better choice.

Anyway... the response is nice. Just doesn't fix anything.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] -2 points 5 months ago (2 children)

    They care about privacy and security, not marketing. They probably hate that they have to do marketing in the first place. It's honestly relatable.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 5 months ago (1 child)

    their marketing practices have been questionable for years, though. the promotional emails (everyone subscribed by default) and even the pricing pages are filled with dark patterns. by the charity fundraisers they do, these dark patterns don't seem to be necessary for their sustainability.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 4 months ago

    Imo almost all of marketing can be considered dark patterns. And when your competition uses dark patterns, if you don't use it you simply don't gain users.

    I'm reminded of a Veritasium video on clickbait (too lazy to link it right now but should be easy to find). They talk about how there's a balance between marketing (and furthermore, manipulative marketing) and reach. If you believe the user will benefit from your service, then maybe it's worth a bit of manipulative marketing, just to get them to enter the door. It's a tricky balance.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 53 points 5 months ago (8 children)

    "You are right to raise this and we want to address this directly"

    Isnt that how Claude Sonnet or Opus writes?

  • source
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 49 points 5 months ago (3 children)

    I think they’ve just been trained on corporate speak

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 5 months ago (2 children)

    Can't tell if your talking about the (human) Proton marketer responding on reddit, or the (AI) Claude and Opus 🙃

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] -2 points 5 months ago (2 children)

    Stop this "I suspect it was made with AI" witch hunt, please, it's completely fruitless

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 5 months ago

    They seem to know that the market for privacy is more than people who want just want their private data safe. There are also people that use these services for controversial and or illegal shit. So they use these chuds and reach those spaces.

    It's the swiss business model. A lot of controversial and corrupted people, politicians hide their money in privacy oriented banks offshore. They make profits no matter where the money comes from.

    A little bad press after the stuff is out doesn't really matter all that much if that drives more profits. The backlash might even get them more exposure.

    They apologize and say they'll never do it again and everyone moves on.

  • source
  • [–] 10 points 5 months ago (2 children)

    I am out of the loop it seems. What happened ?

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (-1 replies)
    [–] 80 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (8 children)

    As I mentioned more in detail in other post, Proton is not the pro-MAGA many had misinterpreted. It is just sloppy at the marketing campaign and its leader makes statements that can easily misunderstood too.

    That said, Proton has decided to aim for the masses, which has proven to be a winning business formula here. However, in that quest, it's natural that concerns from top-tier privacy users (Linux users, those wanting non-Google push notifications, too-many-eggs-in-a-basket, etc.) get relegated in favor of the bulk of their primary target customers, the regular Joe who simply wants to move away from email and web traffic scraping. We should all applaud that decision, but we also recognize the limitations and big risks of having a single company holding some 80% of this privacy market, both for us and even for Proton. It would be better to foster a healthy, diverse, and more equitable privacy ecosystem.

  • source
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [+] -18 points 5 months ago (7 children)

    The fact you think being pro-MAGA is the only evil we should be concerned about is telling.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 5 months ago (6 children)

    No idea why the downvotes are hitting this so hard.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 44 points 5 months ago

    Maybe because it's a bit like if someone said "I got the test results, I don't have cancer", and that dude replied with "the fact that you think cancer is the only danger you should be concerned about is telling".

    Sure, it's technically correct, but it's obnoxious and, without any further context, just seems to be off-topic.

  • source
  • parent
  • [+] -7 points 5 months ago (3 children)

    Non ml lemures. Liberals and reactionaries.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 5 months ago (2 children)

    I love that the comment explaining it already existed when you wrote this. No, it couldn't be that you were out of line! It had to just be the liberals!

    As a leftist, maybe shut the fuck up sometimes. Maybe you aren't always the smartest person in the room, and complaining about stuff that isn't even relevant is, at best, annoying, if not actively harmful because people will ignore it when it is relevant.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] -5 points 5 months ago* (1 child)

    As a leftist,

    This expression is so liberal. Your identity, or mine, doesn't mean much. And liberals and the true left have different views on leftism. The imperialist Bernie Sanders is from the phony left.

    As for the post, "They hate Jesus because he told them the truth". As an atheist.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [+] 16 points 5 months ago (26 children)
  • [–] 12 points 5 months ago (2 children)

    GOG in this situation: Block the video for everyone speaking French.

    But let's see if Proton actually stop this shit with other right wing weirdos or will just stop the sponsorship with this one dude.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [+] 11 points 5 months ago (1 child)
  • [–] 7 points 5 months ago

    Nah this is what peak PR looks like:

    "The right wing ideology is part of my cultural and historical heritage. As a Swiss, I am fully aware of both its history and the sensitivities surrounding it.

    ...

    As a Swiss, I have every reason to treat this history with seriousness and respect. Precisely because of that, I reject any suggestion that this promotion carried an extremist message. It did not."

    I'll never forget this shit, such ass response from GOG

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 3 points 5 months ago (22 children)

    Fill me in, what have GOG done? Please link to trustworthy source(s).

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 22 child comments
  • [–] 18 points 5 months ago* (20 children)

    Sent a newsletter to half their customers containing "Slavic runes" (literally the logo for the SS) to promote some Slavic fantasy game

    Blue text

    Imo it's even odds between some marketing child-left-behind googling "Slavic runes" to add to their email, and some 4channer on the team thinking they're making a funny joke. The fact that they recognized the issue enough to know that couldn't send the email in Germany, but sent it everywhere else anyway, makes me lean a little bit more toward the latter

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 20 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 5 months ago (18 children)

    I'm confused. I have Scandinavian ancestry and understand that some of the cultural identity was appropriated by Nazis and now some extremist fuck wits. e.g. how the Hindu swastika (also often confused with sauvastika) was appropriated. But I don't understand why that means appropriated symbols automatically = bad if they're used in their original context?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 18 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (17 children)

    The main issue is that ϟϟ was both totally irrelevant to the topic besides being vaguely Slavic, and also literally the logo for the SS. In the modern day, that is its only connotation. It's not in its original context, it's just random runes thrown together

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 17 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 5 months ago (16 children)

    I'm asking both specifically about the GOG thing but also more generally. Yes, I know the SS appropriated runes for tgwit logo but I still don't see how that automatically makes runes themselves bad. I can understand how it would be triggering for some folks and so a level of sensitivity is required (which GOG clearly failed on) but I still don't get how appropriated symbols automatically = bad (because I've seen the same reactions to other ancient symbols over and over again and I'm still trying to understand it)

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 16 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 5 months ago (14 children)

    It's bad because the SS appropriated it and stripped all other meaning from it. It's like using the number 1488 in a username. It only means one thing, and while it's possible to stumble into it by accident, it remains a white supremacist dogwhistle

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 14 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 5 months ago (13 children)

    So if someone made an account 20 years ago ending with 88, like say if you were born in 1988, should they now delete their account just because someone might misconstrue it as a completely unrelated “dogwhistle”?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 13 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 5 months ago (2 children)

    20 years ago 88 was as much of a nazi dogwhistle as it is today

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 5 months ago* (4 children)

    Okay, but lets compare this to using runes.

    As you've pointed out, there is an innocent explanation for someone using 88. It could be an honest mistake, there are people (usually whites who aren't endangered by Nazi ideology) that aren't tuned-in enough to know about common Nazi dogwhistles.

    There's no honest mistake in using the double sowilo runes. No innocent explanation.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 5 months ago (3 children)

    There is one innocent explanation, with a big caveat: some child-left-behind in marketing googled "Slavic emojis" and found this page, and clicked on a few random ones, not knowing about the connotations some of them have.

    Caveat: they didn't send the email in Germany, so someone knew it was nazi shit and sent it anyway

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 5 months ago* (2 children)

    Not even, because they used two, side-by-side.

    The comedy of errors that would be required to explain it innocently would be an Adult Swim sketch.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 5 months ago* (1 child)

    Yeah, the two together is one of the options on there. For the same reason that some search queries return those runes with a 1488 appended

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 5 months ago*

    Wait shit I didn't see it

    In hindsight, an idiot accidentally copying a different cryptofascist's work actually is another innocent explanation. "Oops, I didn't know the "cool rune guide" I was copying from was actually made by neonazis."

    Sort of like how Graham Platner might have gotten his Nazi tattoo because one of his buddies in the Marines, who actually is a neonazi, told him it was a good idea and that it was just a cool looking skull tattoo.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 5 months ago (4 children)

    There's no misconstruing, 1488 is a nazi dogwhistle whether someone intends it to be or not. If your username includes that number, you should delete that account and make a different one, because people are gonna treat you like a nazi.

    Just using 88 is slightly less unacceptable, but the same thing applies; if your username includes that number, people are going to treat you like you're a nazi.

    ϟϟ has exactly one meaning in the modern day. You can use those runes without knowing that meaning, but that meaning is still there. It is nazi symbolism whether you intend your use of it to be or not.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 5 months ago (3 children)

    Yeah, I’ll go tell all my friends and relatives who were born in 1988 and wanted a specific username which were already taken and used (or even if they have a name and surname that’s already taken) and added 88 as an affix since it’s the year they were born in (as people have been doing for decades on the internet) that they are now all Nazis.

    Seems pretty obtuse.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 5 months ago (2 children)

    they are now all Nazis

    Well that's not what I said, is it? My favorite thing about Lemmings is that none of you can read. Do you maybe want to try this one again? I'll give you a free redo

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 5 months ago (1 child)

    Just using 88 is slightly less unacceptable, but the same thing applies; if your username includes that number, people are going to treat you like you’re a nazi.

    Your words.

    I’ll tell them to expect to be treated like Nazis then. Which is absolutely wild, because in their 38 year existence this has never happened. Once.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 5 months ago*

    "[...] that they are all now nazis."

    "[...] people are going to treat you like you're a nazi."

    Spot the difference. I'll give you a hint: one of them involves being a nazi, and one of them involves being mistaken for a nazi. You managed to misread my comment so badly that you thought I was saying that everyone who has 88 in their username is a nazi, and that's because you can't read.

    But even that's totally irrelevant. I specified 1488 in my comment. You know anyone with 1488 in their username who isn't a nazi? Because if you do, I have bad news about your nazi friend.

    Even moreso with ϟϟ. Much like 1488, it only means one thing. The people who use it virtually always use it to mean that one thing. It is very hard to stumble into accidentally using it, and if you do, you should be embarrassed for having stumbled into using nazi symbolism.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 71 points 5 months ago (26 children)

    They screwed up, admitted it, apologized, don't see why people are calling for blood anymore. People are allowed to make mistakes, they owned it and they cut ties with the guy.

  • source
  • hideshow 26 child comments
  • [–] 26 points 5 months ago (5 children)

    They keep making right wing mistakes though. I think that points to something.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] -1 points 5 months ago (4 children)

    what's a left wing mistake that they might get called out for?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 5 months ago (3 children)

    Lots of other companies seem to easily avoid voicing support for fascists both directly with their own words or via sponsorship money. Weird how Proton can’t seem to figure it out. If they can’t even get the little stuff right why would I trust them with my data?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 5 months ago

    why would I trust them with my data

    because proton is highly regarded among privacy experts.

    and i'm guessing most privacy experts dgaf about politics like most technology experts don't.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] -5 points 5 months ago (16 children)

    Do you actually think it's okay that they had a bot make a press release this hamfisted?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 16 child comments
  • [–] 31 points 5 months ago (15 children)

    Bold claim, corroborated with no proof.

    Sure it looks like AI speech patterns, but they are trained on corporate speech, so hard to differentiate an LLM from a corporate spokesperson.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 15 child comments
  • [–] -2 points 5 months ago (11 children)

    How tf did I get downvoted for saying it sounds like AI bullshit? Who are these people who actually object to my assessment? I feel like I'm living in the upside down

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 11 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 5 months ago

    Because people will call anything AI slop now, without any evidence. This doesn't look AI generated to me. This is the same as something we'd have seen a decade ago. There's even a weird space at the start of a paragraph, which makes me think human, not AI.

    Why do you think this is AI? What indications are there for that, other than the corpo-speak, which has been normal for a long time before AI even, hence the name.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 7 points 5 months ago (9 children)

    Do you actually think it's okay that they had a bot make a press release this hamfisted?

    You are not "saying it sounds like it is written by AI", you are affirming it is written by an AI. Big difference.
    You affirmation being formated as a question doesn't change anything, it is a Loaded Question, which tends to be frowned upon.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [+] -8 points 5 months ago (8 children)

    Babe I have two eyes, two ears, and a heart that yearns for honesty and knowledge. I know people can sound robotic too, and there are corporate scripts, and autism is a factor, but good lord. If there was an alien wearing human-esque skin suit standing in front of you I don't think you'd be able to tell it from an actual person and that's just sad.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 5 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (7 children)

    Depending on the definition of "a person", an alien could be one. What would be your definition of a person ?

    I was just pointing out your earlier answer is a loaded question, by definition.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] -5 points 5 months ago (6 children)

    Sure they could be a person. I think dolphins and elephants are people too. You are arguing in bad faith. You can't tell if a human or AI wrote a press statement and that makes me sad.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 5 months ago* (5 children)

    To be arguing in bad faith would require me to have made an argument, which I did not.
    Other than pointing out the lack of proof of your (badly) hidden argument, I never pretended it to be either LLM speech or human corpo speech. Because there are no proof of either being objectively more likely than the other.

    But you did, using a loaded question, which is written in such way to deny the possibility for it to be human corpo speech, which existed way earlier than LLMs.

    You asked why you were getting downvoted, I anwered with the definition of why. With a link to the definition for you to read so you may improve your "question".

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 5 months ago (4 children)

    You did make an argument. Idk how that isn't evident to you. You're being well ackshually rn.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (3 children)

    I reread the thread, my apologizes, you are right on that, I just forgot my first comment 😅.

    The "alien being a person" argument is more an ironic one, you can ignore that. Any intelligent being, alien or not, is a person.

    On the other hand, I could give you a corpus of 10 texts, part of them written by hand by your truly, only using a non-ai writing help to avoid obvious gramatical mistakes (English is not my native language), imitating corpo speech, and the anothers generated by my local AI (Mistral:7B). Would you accept to try ?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 4 months ago (2 children)
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 12 points 5 months ago (2 children)
  • [–] 6 points 5 months ago (1 child)

    Personally can't wait until thundermail has a free tier

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 5 points 5 months ago

    Always hold companies responsible! Call them out and make them publicly respond. Shop local, fuck corporations!

  • source
  • [–] 22 points 5 months ago* (2 children)

    I feel like this is a good statement. The one that should have been written immediately after outrage began, and ideally before removing dozens if not hundreds of posts and comments covering this topic.

    Some people say it stinks of AI. I don't know. Maybe? PR messages have always been like this, and they seem to be one of the types that chatbots got most of their writing patterns from.

    Some people definitely overreacted. Others completely missed the point. Proton is far from a perfect company, and a case in favour of boycotting them could be made. But not because they accidentally sponsored one video of a far-right youtuber.

    They're just not as private and secure as they pretend to be or to want to be. Pretty much all alternatives are leagues above. There appears to be no apparent reason why they're lagging behind. I suppose that's where the CIA honeypot allegations may come from.

    In any case, if you really care about privacy and security - you probably aren't a Proton user, let alone customer. And if you are - I highly recommend trying alternatives that don't have a long history of working with law enforcement.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 5 months ago

    The one that should have been written immediately after outrage began, and ideally before removing dozens if not hundreds of posts and comments covering this topic.

    For what it's worth - apparently they said they're crafting a response fairly early, kept one of the original threads and removed the rest as duplicates.

    But I don't know if that's really the case.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 5 months ago

    In any case, if you really care about privacy and security - you probably aren’t a Proton user, let alone customer. And if you are - I highly recommend trying alternatives that don’t have a long history of working with law enforcement.

    what else has a full complement of services besides tuta?

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 26 points 5 months ago* (6 children)

    I can TASTE the prompt from this image

    The Proton founder is Pro MAGA that should be the end of it for most of you. I'm never going to leave Njalla for my VPN needs

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 15 points 5 months ago

    While I agree that the response is heavily AI generated, I have to disagree that he's pro-Maga. He reached out to both democrats and republicans to talk about the importance of privacy and the democrats turned him down (or entirely ignored him) while the republicans met with him.

    He then went on Xitter to shame the Dems and said that the Republicans seemed to be the party caring about privacy.

    He's definitely a dumbass for trying to play it that way, but he did not come out in support of Maga.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 11 points 5 months ago (3 children)

    He was not pro maga just because he could gain an audience with GOP members but not dems on a lobbying trip. There has never been a single shred of evidence showing he is pro maga, and at this point I'm just going to assume it's a smear campaign against a Google competitor.

    Change my mind. I dare anyone to show the proof.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [+] -7 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (2 children)

    How does that make sense? Google is also maga. Hell, YouTube is one of the biggest rabbit holes for extremism in general. They could tune their algorithms for anything they wanted - it’s pretty clear.

    For Proton we’ll it’s easy to say there is no evidence after dismissing all of it. How maga of you.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 5 months ago

    How does that make sense? Google is also maga.

    that's not how most people think about google, and so it could be used (even by google) to smear competitors with being pro-maga. it matters more for the users of the competitor than it does for the users of google.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 8 points 5 months ago

    We shouldnt have sponsored a fascist because we son't want to work with ANYONE political

    lol okayyyyyy, whatever bro

  • source
  • [–] 5 points 5 months ago

    That's why I'm leaving proton and it's community. Lots of drama and political shit that I don't want to know, not to mention the whole thing where proton from just an email provider, now sells VPN and other services l.

  • source
  • 68 comments in c/privacy@programming.dev view that post