top 67 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 118 points 5 months ago (15 children)
  • [–] 11 points 5 months ago (3 children)

    People are so obsessed with contacting aliens, but maybe they are really really annoying.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 5 months ago (10 children)

    I did not order these ton of bricks, but I'm grateful. Thanks friend!

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 5 months ago (9 children)

    Space expands like bread expands, everywhere all at once. Your galaxies are like raisins in that bread. The space around them is carrying them while it expands. This means it’s pretty much guaranteed, you’ll eventually be gaining distance from all other galaxies faster than the speed of light. Because the distance isn’t a function of speed, but growth — so it can go faster than c. You, however, can never go faster than c. So, the picture is right.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 5 months ago (8 children)

    Just invent wormholes to access hyperspace, and cross the universe in one step

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 5 months ago (7 children)

    I don’t think you want to deal with wormhole TSA, friend.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 5 months ago (6 children)

    You go through TSA at the space ports before boarding the ship. The only thing different about going through a wormhole is a bit of turbulence, some spaghettification, and the unverifiable possibility that the physical organism which gets reconstituted on the other side is merely an empty vessel programmed to unconsciously imitate your habits and mannerisms, while the conscious entity that is you actually perished upon the dissolution of your original body.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 5 months ago (5 children)

    unverifiable possibility that the physical organism which gets reconstituted on the other side is merely an empty vessel programmed to unconsciously imitate your habits and mannerisms

    Oh yeah, I’ve tried anesthesia before.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 5 months ago (4 children)

    Is that a theory about anesthesia? I haven't heard about that.

    I'm referring to ideas about teleportation and time travel, in which the physical organism dissolves and is reconstituted, and appears to be alive and conscious on the other side, but the actual conscious entity died upon dissolution and was not resurrected upon reconstitution.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 5 months ago (3 children)

    Yes, it’s a very similar idea with anesthesia. It uses the same regard for self as being something more than just a meat bag in motion. Anesthesia is understood as a reversible suppression of consciousness, memory, sensation, and awareness. If consciousness completely disappears, how do we know the subjective “you” that wakes up is identical to the one that went under?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 5 months ago (2 children)

    Now that's got me spooked out about how could I know if I'm even the same person moment-to-moment, or what if every blink of the eye or beat of the hard represents a granular moment in time in which a unique conscious entity that has never arisen before nor ever will again flows in and out of existence, like the flame of a candle which continuously renews itself even as the heat and light of one moments dissipates out into empty space the next; with all the memories of the conscious entities that inhabited the space behind my eyes before it, yet with no true ontological continuity between them?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 79 points 5 months ago* (18 children)

    Before anyone gets too cocky, remember that signal strength drops off at the square of distance. Even this tiny blip of range generally pales in comparison to the background radiation. We're still almost invisible to our own technology at any serious distance.

    For a reference, see how absolutely difficult it is to talk to the Voyager probes. The signal they receive is absolutely tiny. (20 billion times smaller than what it takes to run a digital watch, see the Deep Space Network for what does the talking).

    If any aliens have heard us, their technology already outstrips ours by orders of magnitude.

  • source
  • hideshow 18 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 5 months ago (15 children)

    And if their technology outstrips us by that much, would they even notice us?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 15 child comments
  • [–] 20 points 5 months ago (13 children)
  • [–] 2 points 5 months ago (3 children)

    Not care like an ant colony a few thousand miles away or not care like an ant colony in my kitchen?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 5 months ago (7 children)
  • [–] 16 points 5 months ago* (4 children)

    what resources do we have that wouldn't be elsewhere, in likely greater abundance/concentration?

    latest estimate is there are 6 billion earth-like planets in our galaxy. and 200+ confirmed temperate rocky planets we have catalogged already out of 2000 ID'd exoplanets.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 5 months ago

    We don't have to be unique, we might just be the next stop that has the resources. Maybe they're supernaturally interstellar and can move on. Maybe they're barely interstellar and can't afford to skip. Maybe nearly every earth-like has life and it's all deemed lower-ranking than this interstellar society. Maybe nearly every earth-like has life but this interstellar species has no anthropomorphic mammalian qualities and they don't care. There's no reason to beleive we can negotiate with aliens when humans largely do not respectfully negotiate with other species now. Hell, we don't negotiate respectfully between ourselves

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 0 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

    Soil. Go look around for soil on any other planet. There isn’t any.

    There might also be a lot of value in studying alien intelligence. We don’t know because we’ve never met any, but imagine doing so is a serious way to discover something new about how the universe can be understood at all.

    Edit: by that, I mean the taxonomy on our phenomenology. There’s nothing ontological about feeling “good” or “bad,” nor “confused,” “scared,” or “horny.” Not even of those “aha” moments when you figure something out.

    We have hundreds millions of years worth of systems evolution in our head, creating a damn fine survival engine. Hell, it even helps us feel a little like we understand the universe and how it works. Surely theres not just our way to do that, and aliens could be interested in our way.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 21 points 5 months ago

    There are around 20000 stars in that little 200-light-year-wide dot.

    https://www.pas.rochester.edu/~emamajek/memo_star_dens.html and 1pc≈3.3ly.

  • source
  • [–] 14 points 5 months ago (6 children)

    The Fermi Paradox doesn't seem that paradoxical when you see a map like this. Civilizations could be screaming into the void for millenniums without reaching the other side of the galaxy. Signal strength drops fast too. How would would ever distinguish a faded signal from background noise?

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 5 months ago (3 children)

    Currently reading through the 3 body problem and it touches the idea that maybe we shouldn't scream into the void.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 5 months ago (2 children)

    Too late for that. Early antennas threw radio waves all over the place.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 13 points 5 months ago (1 child)

    So remember when you're feeling very small and insecure

    How amazingly unlikely is your birth

    And pray that there's intelligent life somewhere up in space

    'Cause there's bugger all down here on Earth!

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 9 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (4 children)

    200 light years radius is for radio signals to reach someone. 100 years radius for possibly receiving a signal back.

    And that is if they received our signals, are able to identify that they are artificial signals out of the background noise of the rest of the universe because the signal degrades and gets weaker as the broadcast expands, they decide to send a reply back (even though they just recieve chatter at that point, not intentional communication to them), and then actually sends us a signal back. It's no wonder that hasn't happened yet.

    There's around 10-15,000 stars in a 100 light years radius. The chance that any of those stars have habitable planets with intelligent life with the technology to receive and send radio signals and is listening for extraterrestial signals and can discern those broadcasts from background noise and would reply to chatter... that's a small chance. For context, we have only been explicitly listening for and sending signals intended for extraterrestrials for 64 years ourselves, so an identical civilization 100 light years away that received and replied to us immediately would still have 36 years of transit left on their reply.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 5 months ago* (3 children)

    200 light years radius is for radio signals to reach someone. 100 years radius for possibly receiving a signal back

    So I have more bad news, the strength of our radio signals is not very strong either so by about 20ly, they fade into background noise so no one would be able to pick them up at all. (could be a lot less than 20ly too, possibly 5 ly depending on the signal)

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 5 months ago

    What's also neat, is that this diagram won't need updating any time soon. Maybe in a hundred years, we can swap the 2 for a 3 in the label. 🥴

  • source
  • [–] 11 points 5 months ago (2 children)

    This is an approximation, right? Because there's no giant cosmic mirror that lets us see our galaxy from far away like this?

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 5 months ago (1 child)

    Apparently "the first audio radio broadcast of voice and music occurred on December 24, 1906, when Canadian-American inventor Reginald A Fessenden transmitted from Brant Rock, Massachusetts. This historic transmission, heard by shipboard radio operators along the Atlantic Coast, included Fessenden playing the violin solo of 'O Holy Night' and reading from the Bible, marking the beginning of amplitude modulation (AM) broadcasting".

    I wonder if that's what aliens would hear as the first sign of humans?

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 5 months ago

    the first audio radio broadcast of voice and music occurred on December 24, 1906

    And the strength of that signal would have been so weak that even at a distance of only 5ly (maybe less), background noise would drown it out completely.

    No one knows we are here.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 3 points 5 months ago (2 children)

    only 99,800 years to go. optimism!

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 5 months ago (2 children)

    Further than I would have guessed!

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 5 months ago

    Little blue dot…of radio waves, lol.

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 5 months ago

    @zedgeist True, but somebody could do a cool count-up "clock" like the "debt clock" that would count the stars that have heard our transmissions, so far.Call the start 1926, though we had some largish transmitters earlier. By '26, I think they were all over the world, broadcasting every direction.So call it 100ly, and get a count, then advance by 1ly/yr. The number of stars would go up as the cube of time.

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (2 children)

    Soo, the grey slury inbetween is more rock-heavy, while the blue stuff is mostly hydrogen?

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 5 months ago*

    "I am Optimus Prime, and I send this message to any surviving Autobots taking refuge among the stars: We are here. We are waiting."

  • source