▲ 382 ▼ we're so smol (lemmy.world) submitted 5 months ago by zedgeist@lemmy.world to c/science@lemmy.world 68 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] qevlarr@lemmy.world 118 points 5 months ago (15 children) 😧 1 permalink fedilink source hideshow 15 child comments replies: [–] dan1101@lemmy.world 11 points 5 months ago (3 children) People are so obsessed with contacting aliens, but maybe they are really really annoying. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz 15 points 5 months ago I got some bad news for you. We are the annoying aliens. "Squeglesquortsquersqueweldorf" ["The earthlings are broadcasting again. Maintain radio silence; do not respond!"] permalink fedilink source parent [–] wabasso@lemmy.ca 5 points 5 months ago* I’m convinced of the dark forest hypothesis. Even 200 ly is too big for me. permalink fedilink source parent [–] akwd169@sh.itjust.works 2 points 5 months ago So not too different from us then? permalink fedilink source parent [–] DaMonsterKnees@lemmy.world 4 points 5 months ago (10 children) I did not order these ton of bricks, but I'm grateful. Thanks friend! permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 10 child comments replies: [–] partofthevoice@lemmy.zip 3 points 5 months ago (9 children) Space expands like bread expands, everywhere all at once. Your galaxies are like raisins in that bread. The space around them is carrying them while it expands. This means it’s pretty much guaranteed, you’ll eventually be gaining distance from all other galaxies faster than the speed of light. Because the distance isn’t a function of speed, but growth — so it can go faster than c. You, however, can never go faster than c. So, the picture is right. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 9 child comments replies: [–] wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz 2 points 5 months ago (8 children) Just invent wormholes to access hyperspace, and cross the universe in one step permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 8 child comments replies: [–] partofthevoice@lemmy.zip 4 points 5 months ago (7 children) I don’t think you want to deal with wormhole TSA, friend. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 7 child comments replies: [–] wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz 1 point 5 months ago (6 children) You go through TSA at the space ports before boarding the ship. The only thing different about going through a wormhole is a bit of turbulence, some spaghettification, and the unverifiable possibility that the physical organism which gets reconstituted on the other side is merely an empty vessel programmed to unconsciously imitate your habits and mannerisms, while the conscious entity that is you actually perished upon the dissolution of your original body. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] partofthevoice@lemmy.zip 1 point 5 months ago (5 children) unverifiable possibility that the physical organism which gets reconstituted on the other side is merely an empty vessel programmed to unconsciously imitate your habits and mannerisms Oh yeah, I’ve tried anesthesia before. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz 1 point 5 months ago (4 children) Is that a theory about anesthesia? I haven't heard about that. I'm referring to ideas about teleportation and time travel, in which the physical organism dissolves and is reconstituted, and appears to be alive and conscious on the other side, but the actual conscious entity died upon dissolution and was not resurrected upon reconstitution. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] partofthevoice@lemmy.zip 1 point 5 months ago (3 children) Yes, it’s a very similar idea with anesthesia. It uses the same regard for self as being something more than just a meat bag in motion. Anesthesia is understood as a reversible suppression of consciousness, memory, sensation, and awareness. If consciousness completely disappears, how do we know the subjective “you” that wakes up is identical to the one that went under? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz 0 points 5 months ago (2 children) Now that's got me spooked out about how could I know if I'm even the same person moment-to-moment, or what if every blink of the eye or beat of the hard represents a granular moment in time in which a unique conscious entity that has never arisen before nor ever will again flows in and out of existence, like the flame of a candle which continuously renews itself even as the heat and light of one moments dissipates out into empty space the next; with all the memories of the conscious entities that inhabited the space behind my eyes before it, yet with no true ontological continuity between them? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] partofthevoice@lemmy.zip 1 point 5 months ago (1 child) It is spooky but less so if you subscribe to a more procedural version of consciousness. The phenomenon of phenomenology may mislead us about what the self is. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz 0 points 5 months ago No yeah, I don't actually believe in what I described, I was just shitting around permalink fedilink source parent
[–] dan1101@lemmy.world 11 points 5 months ago (3 children) People are so obsessed with contacting aliens, but maybe they are really really annoying. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz 15 points 5 months ago I got some bad news for you. We are the annoying aliens. "Squeglesquortsquersqueweldorf" ["The earthlings are broadcasting again. Maintain radio silence; do not respond!"] permalink fedilink source parent [–] wabasso@lemmy.ca 5 points 5 months ago* I’m convinced of the dark forest hypothesis. Even 200 ly is too big for me. permalink fedilink source parent [–] akwd169@sh.itjust.works 2 points 5 months ago So not too different from us then? permalink fedilink source parent
[–] wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz 15 points 5 months ago I got some bad news for you. We are the annoying aliens. "Squeglesquortsquersqueweldorf" ["The earthlings are broadcasting again. Maintain radio silence; do not respond!"] permalink fedilink source parent
[–] wabasso@lemmy.ca 5 points 5 months ago* I’m convinced of the dark forest hypothesis. Even 200 ly is too big for me. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] akwd169@sh.itjust.works 2 points 5 months ago So not too different from us then? permalink fedilink source parent
[–] DaMonsterKnees@lemmy.world 4 points 5 months ago (10 children) I did not order these ton of bricks, but I'm grateful. Thanks friend! permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 10 child comments replies: [–] partofthevoice@lemmy.zip 3 points 5 months ago (9 children) Space expands like bread expands, everywhere all at once. Your galaxies are like raisins in that bread. The space around them is carrying them while it expands. This means it’s pretty much guaranteed, you’ll eventually be gaining distance from all other galaxies faster than the speed of light. Because the distance isn’t a function of speed, but growth — so it can go faster than c. You, however, can never go faster than c. So, the picture is right. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 9 child comments replies: [–] wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz 2 points 5 months ago (8 children) Just invent wormholes to access hyperspace, and cross the universe in one step permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 8 child comments replies: [–] partofthevoice@lemmy.zip 4 points 5 months ago (7 children) I don’t think you want to deal with wormhole TSA, friend. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 7 child comments replies: [–] wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz 1 point 5 months ago (6 children) You go through TSA at the space ports before boarding the ship. The only thing different about going through a wormhole is a bit of turbulence, some spaghettification, and the unverifiable possibility that the physical organism which gets reconstituted on the other side is merely an empty vessel programmed to unconsciously imitate your habits and mannerisms, while the conscious entity that is you actually perished upon the dissolution of your original body. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] partofthevoice@lemmy.zip 1 point 5 months ago (5 children) unverifiable possibility that the physical organism which gets reconstituted on the other side is merely an empty vessel programmed to unconsciously imitate your habits and mannerisms Oh yeah, I’ve tried anesthesia before. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz 1 point 5 months ago (4 children) Is that a theory about anesthesia? I haven't heard about that. I'm referring to ideas about teleportation and time travel, in which the physical organism dissolves and is reconstituted, and appears to be alive and conscious on the other side, but the actual conscious entity died upon dissolution and was not resurrected upon reconstitution. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] partofthevoice@lemmy.zip 1 point 5 months ago (3 children) Yes, it’s a very similar idea with anesthesia. It uses the same regard for self as being something more than just a meat bag in motion. Anesthesia is understood as a reversible suppression of consciousness, memory, sensation, and awareness. If consciousness completely disappears, how do we know the subjective “you” that wakes up is identical to the one that went under? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz 0 points 5 months ago (2 children) Now that's got me spooked out about how could I know if I'm even the same person moment-to-moment, or what if every blink of the eye or beat of the hard represents a granular moment in time in which a unique conscious entity that has never arisen before nor ever will again flows in and out of existence, like the flame of a candle which continuously renews itself even as the heat and light of one moments dissipates out into empty space the next; with all the memories of the conscious entities that inhabited the space behind my eyes before it, yet with no true ontological continuity between them? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] partofthevoice@lemmy.zip 1 point 5 months ago (1 child) It is spooky but less so if you subscribe to a more procedural version of consciousness. The phenomenon of phenomenology may mislead us about what the self is. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz 0 points 5 months ago No yeah, I don't actually believe in what I described, I was just shitting around permalink fedilink source parent
[–] partofthevoice@lemmy.zip 3 points 5 months ago (9 children) Space expands like bread expands, everywhere all at once. Your galaxies are like raisins in that bread. The space around them is carrying them while it expands. This means it’s pretty much guaranteed, you’ll eventually be gaining distance from all other galaxies faster than the speed of light. Because the distance isn’t a function of speed, but growth — so it can go faster than c. You, however, can never go faster than c. So, the picture is right. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 9 child comments replies: [–] wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz 2 points 5 months ago (8 children) Just invent wormholes to access hyperspace, and cross the universe in one step permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 8 child comments replies: [–] partofthevoice@lemmy.zip 4 points 5 months ago (7 children) I don’t think you want to deal with wormhole TSA, friend. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 7 child comments replies: [–] wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz 1 point 5 months ago (6 children) You go through TSA at the space ports before boarding the ship. The only thing different about going through a wormhole is a bit of turbulence, some spaghettification, and the unverifiable possibility that the physical organism which gets reconstituted on the other side is merely an empty vessel programmed to unconsciously imitate your habits and mannerisms, while the conscious entity that is you actually perished upon the dissolution of your original body. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] partofthevoice@lemmy.zip 1 point 5 months ago (5 children) unverifiable possibility that the physical organism which gets reconstituted on the other side is merely an empty vessel programmed to unconsciously imitate your habits and mannerisms Oh yeah, I’ve tried anesthesia before. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz 1 point 5 months ago (4 children) Is that a theory about anesthesia? I haven't heard about that. I'm referring to ideas about teleportation and time travel, in which the physical organism dissolves and is reconstituted, and appears to be alive and conscious on the other side, but the actual conscious entity died upon dissolution and was not resurrected upon reconstitution. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] partofthevoice@lemmy.zip 1 point 5 months ago (3 children) Yes, it’s a very similar idea with anesthesia. It uses the same regard for self as being something more than just a meat bag in motion. Anesthesia is understood as a reversible suppression of consciousness, memory, sensation, and awareness. If consciousness completely disappears, how do we know the subjective “you” that wakes up is identical to the one that went under? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz 0 points 5 months ago (2 children) Now that's got me spooked out about how could I know if I'm even the same person moment-to-moment, or what if every blink of the eye or beat of the hard represents a granular moment in time in which a unique conscious entity that has never arisen before nor ever will again flows in and out of existence, like the flame of a candle which continuously renews itself even as the heat and light of one moments dissipates out into empty space the next; with all the memories of the conscious entities that inhabited the space behind my eyes before it, yet with no true ontological continuity between them? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] partofthevoice@lemmy.zip 1 point 5 months ago (1 child) It is spooky but less so if you subscribe to a more procedural version of consciousness. The phenomenon of phenomenology may mislead us about what the self is. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz 0 points 5 months ago No yeah, I don't actually believe in what I described, I was just shitting around permalink fedilink source parent
[–] wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz 2 points 5 months ago (8 children) Just invent wormholes to access hyperspace, and cross the universe in one step permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 8 child comments replies: [–] partofthevoice@lemmy.zip 4 points 5 months ago (7 children) I don’t think you want to deal with wormhole TSA, friend. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 7 child comments replies: [–] wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz 1 point 5 months ago (6 children) You go through TSA at the space ports before boarding the ship. The only thing different about going through a wormhole is a bit of turbulence, some spaghettification, and the unverifiable possibility that the physical organism which gets reconstituted on the other side is merely an empty vessel programmed to unconsciously imitate your habits and mannerisms, while the conscious entity that is you actually perished upon the dissolution of your original body. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] partofthevoice@lemmy.zip 1 point 5 months ago (5 children) unverifiable possibility that the physical organism which gets reconstituted on the other side is merely an empty vessel programmed to unconsciously imitate your habits and mannerisms Oh yeah, I’ve tried anesthesia before. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz 1 point 5 months ago (4 children) Is that a theory about anesthesia? I haven't heard about that. I'm referring to ideas about teleportation and time travel, in which the physical organism dissolves and is reconstituted, and appears to be alive and conscious on the other side, but the actual conscious entity died upon dissolution and was not resurrected upon reconstitution. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] partofthevoice@lemmy.zip 1 point 5 months ago (3 children) Yes, it’s a very similar idea with anesthesia. It uses the same regard for self as being something more than just a meat bag in motion. Anesthesia is understood as a reversible suppression of consciousness, memory, sensation, and awareness. If consciousness completely disappears, how do we know the subjective “you” that wakes up is identical to the one that went under? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz 0 points 5 months ago (2 children) Now that's got me spooked out about how could I know if I'm even the same person moment-to-moment, or what if every blink of the eye or beat of the hard represents a granular moment in time in which a unique conscious entity that has never arisen before nor ever will again flows in and out of existence, like the flame of a candle which continuously renews itself even as the heat and light of one moments dissipates out into empty space the next; with all the memories of the conscious entities that inhabited the space behind my eyes before it, yet with no true ontological continuity between them? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] partofthevoice@lemmy.zip 1 point 5 months ago (1 child) It is spooky but less so if you subscribe to a more procedural version of consciousness. The phenomenon of phenomenology may mislead us about what the self is. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz 0 points 5 months ago No yeah, I don't actually believe in what I described, I was just shitting around permalink fedilink source parent
[–] partofthevoice@lemmy.zip 4 points 5 months ago (7 children) I don’t think you want to deal with wormhole TSA, friend. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 7 child comments replies: [–] wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz 1 point 5 months ago (6 children) You go through TSA at the space ports before boarding the ship. The only thing different about going through a wormhole is a bit of turbulence, some spaghettification, and the unverifiable possibility that the physical organism which gets reconstituted on the other side is merely an empty vessel programmed to unconsciously imitate your habits and mannerisms, while the conscious entity that is you actually perished upon the dissolution of your original body. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] partofthevoice@lemmy.zip 1 point 5 months ago (5 children) unverifiable possibility that the physical organism which gets reconstituted on the other side is merely an empty vessel programmed to unconsciously imitate your habits and mannerisms Oh yeah, I’ve tried anesthesia before. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz 1 point 5 months ago (4 children) Is that a theory about anesthesia? I haven't heard about that. I'm referring to ideas about teleportation and time travel, in which the physical organism dissolves and is reconstituted, and appears to be alive and conscious on the other side, but the actual conscious entity died upon dissolution and was not resurrected upon reconstitution. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] partofthevoice@lemmy.zip 1 point 5 months ago (3 children) Yes, it’s a very similar idea with anesthesia. It uses the same regard for self as being something more than just a meat bag in motion. Anesthesia is understood as a reversible suppression of consciousness, memory, sensation, and awareness. If consciousness completely disappears, how do we know the subjective “you” that wakes up is identical to the one that went under? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz 0 points 5 months ago (2 children) Now that's got me spooked out about how could I know if I'm even the same person moment-to-moment, or what if every blink of the eye or beat of the hard represents a granular moment in time in which a unique conscious entity that has never arisen before nor ever will again flows in and out of existence, like the flame of a candle which continuously renews itself even as the heat and light of one moments dissipates out into empty space the next; with all the memories of the conscious entities that inhabited the space behind my eyes before it, yet with no true ontological continuity between them? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] partofthevoice@lemmy.zip 1 point 5 months ago (1 child) It is spooky but less so if you subscribe to a more procedural version of consciousness. The phenomenon of phenomenology may mislead us about what the self is. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz 0 points 5 months ago No yeah, I don't actually believe in what I described, I was just shitting around permalink fedilink source parent
[–] wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz 1 point 5 months ago (6 children) You go through TSA at the space ports before boarding the ship. The only thing different about going through a wormhole is a bit of turbulence, some spaghettification, and the unverifiable possibility that the physical organism which gets reconstituted on the other side is merely an empty vessel programmed to unconsciously imitate your habits and mannerisms, while the conscious entity that is you actually perished upon the dissolution of your original body. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] partofthevoice@lemmy.zip 1 point 5 months ago (5 children) unverifiable possibility that the physical organism which gets reconstituted on the other side is merely an empty vessel programmed to unconsciously imitate your habits and mannerisms Oh yeah, I’ve tried anesthesia before. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz 1 point 5 months ago (4 children) Is that a theory about anesthesia? I haven't heard about that. I'm referring to ideas about teleportation and time travel, in which the physical organism dissolves and is reconstituted, and appears to be alive and conscious on the other side, but the actual conscious entity died upon dissolution and was not resurrected upon reconstitution. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] partofthevoice@lemmy.zip 1 point 5 months ago (3 children) Yes, it’s a very similar idea with anesthesia. It uses the same regard for self as being something more than just a meat bag in motion. Anesthesia is understood as a reversible suppression of consciousness, memory, sensation, and awareness. If consciousness completely disappears, how do we know the subjective “you” that wakes up is identical to the one that went under? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz 0 points 5 months ago (2 children) Now that's got me spooked out about how could I know if I'm even the same person moment-to-moment, or what if every blink of the eye or beat of the hard represents a granular moment in time in which a unique conscious entity that has never arisen before nor ever will again flows in and out of existence, like the flame of a candle which continuously renews itself even as the heat and light of one moments dissipates out into empty space the next; with all the memories of the conscious entities that inhabited the space behind my eyes before it, yet with no true ontological continuity between them? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] partofthevoice@lemmy.zip 1 point 5 months ago (1 child) It is spooky but less so if you subscribe to a more procedural version of consciousness. The phenomenon of phenomenology may mislead us about what the self is. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz 0 points 5 months ago No yeah, I don't actually believe in what I described, I was just shitting around permalink fedilink source parent
[–] partofthevoice@lemmy.zip 1 point 5 months ago (5 children) unverifiable possibility that the physical organism which gets reconstituted on the other side is merely an empty vessel programmed to unconsciously imitate your habits and mannerisms Oh yeah, I’ve tried anesthesia before. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz 1 point 5 months ago (4 children) Is that a theory about anesthesia? I haven't heard about that. I'm referring to ideas about teleportation and time travel, in which the physical organism dissolves and is reconstituted, and appears to be alive and conscious on the other side, but the actual conscious entity died upon dissolution and was not resurrected upon reconstitution. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] partofthevoice@lemmy.zip 1 point 5 months ago (3 children) Yes, it’s a very similar idea with anesthesia. It uses the same regard for self as being something more than just a meat bag in motion. Anesthesia is understood as a reversible suppression of consciousness, memory, sensation, and awareness. If consciousness completely disappears, how do we know the subjective “you” that wakes up is identical to the one that went under? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz 0 points 5 months ago (2 children) Now that's got me spooked out about how could I know if I'm even the same person moment-to-moment, or what if every blink of the eye or beat of the hard represents a granular moment in time in which a unique conscious entity that has never arisen before nor ever will again flows in and out of existence, like the flame of a candle which continuously renews itself even as the heat and light of one moments dissipates out into empty space the next; with all the memories of the conscious entities that inhabited the space behind my eyes before it, yet with no true ontological continuity between them? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] partofthevoice@lemmy.zip 1 point 5 months ago (1 child) It is spooky but less so if you subscribe to a more procedural version of consciousness. The phenomenon of phenomenology may mislead us about what the self is. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz 0 points 5 months ago No yeah, I don't actually believe in what I described, I was just shitting around permalink fedilink source parent
[–] wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz 1 point 5 months ago (4 children) Is that a theory about anesthesia? I haven't heard about that. I'm referring to ideas about teleportation and time travel, in which the physical organism dissolves and is reconstituted, and appears to be alive and conscious on the other side, but the actual conscious entity died upon dissolution and was not resurrected upon reconstitution. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] partofthevoice@lemmy.zip 1 point 5 months ago (3 children) Yes, it’s a very similar idea with anesthesia. It uses the same regard for self as being something more than just a meat bag in motion. Anesthesia is understood as a reversible suppression of consciousness, memory, sensation, and awareness. If consciousness completely disappears, how do we know the subjective “you” that wakes up is identical to the one that went under? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz 0 points 5 months ago (2 children) Now that's got me spooked out about how could I know if I'm even the same person moment-to-moment, or what if every blink of the eye or beat of the hard represents a granular moment in time in which a unique conscious entity that has never arisen before nor ever will again flows in and out of existence, like the flame of a candle which continuously renews itself even as the heat and light of one moments dissipates out into empty space the next; with all the memories of the conscious entities that inhabited the space behind my eyes before it, yet with no true ontological continuity between them? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] partofthevoice@lemmy.zip 1 point 5 months ago (1 child) It is spooky but less so if you subscribe to a more procedural version of consciousness. The phenomenon of phenomenology may mislead us about what the self is. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz 0 points 5 months ago No yeah, I don't actually believe in what I described, I was just shitting around permalink fedilink source parent
[–] partofthevoice@lemmy.zip 1 point 5 months ago (3 children) Yes, it’s a very similar idea with anesthesia. It uses the same regard for self as being something more than just a meat bag in motion. Anesthesia is understood as a reversible suppression of consciousness, memory, sensation, and awareness. If consciousness completely disappears, how do we know the subjective “you” that wakes up is identical to the one that went under? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz 0 points 5 months ago (2 children) Now that's got me spooked out about how could I know if I'm even the same person moment-to-moment, or what if every blink of the eye or beat of the hard represents a granular moment in time in which a unique conscious entity that has never arisen before nor ever will again flows in and out of existence, like the flame of a candle which continuously renews itself even as the heat and light of one moments dissipates out into empty space the next; with all the memories of the conscious entities that inhabited the space behind my eyes before it, yet with no true ontological continuity between them? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] partofthevoice@lemmy.zip 1 point 5 months ago (1 child) It is spooky but less so if you subscribe to a more procedural version of consciousness. The phenomenon of phenomenology may mislead us about what the self is. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz 0 points 5 months ago No yeah, I don't actually believe in what I described, I was just shitting around permalink fedilink source parent
[–] wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz 0 points 5 months ago (2 children) Now that's got me spooked out about how could I know if I'm even the same person moment-to-moment, or what if every blink of the eye or beat of the hard represents a granular moment in time in which a unique conscious entity that has never arisen before nor ever will again flows in and out of existence, like the flame of a candle which continuously renews itself even as the heat and light of one moments dissipates out into empty space the next; with all the memories of the conscious entities that inhabited the space behind my eyes before it, yet with no true ontological continuity between them? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] partofthevoice@lemmy.zip 1 point 5 months ago (1 child) It is spooky but less so if you subscribe to a more procedural version of consciousness. The phenomenon of phenomenology may mislead us about what the self is. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz 0 points 5 months ago No yeah, I don't actually believe in what I described, I was just shitting around permalink fedilink source parent
[–] partofthevoice@lemmy.zip 1 point 5 months ago (1 child) It is spooky but less so if you subscribe to a more procedural version of consciousness. The phenomenon of phenomenology may mislead us about what the self is. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz 0 points 5 months ago No yeah, I don't actually believe in what I described, I was just shitting around permalink fedilink source parent
[–] wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz 0 points 5 months ago No yeah, I don't actually believe in what I described, I was just shitting around permalink fedilink source parent
