Electric cars free people from a finite resource controlled by a few
AI data centres are intended to hook people on a new, artificially created, resource, controlled by a few
Electric cars free people from a finite resource controlled by a few
AI data centres are intended to hook people on a new, artificially created, resource, controlled by a few
Creating a slave class for the capital class is always seen as essential to the capital class which owns the majority of the country.
It's just like we can't do anything politically because it might "impact or reduce jobs" but if corporations want to do something that will net them profit and reduces jobs by the thousands, it's literally not even a question, just let them do it.
Corporations don't have the same rights as people, they clearly have more rights than people.
I mean it literally can't handle data centers either. That's why they're running gas turbines and restarting nuclear reactors.
The advantage is it's a few spots instead of the whole country
Just wait until they cut off households during the heat of summer because they need more power to cool the AI silicon...
To be fair, AI data center hate seems to be pretty bipartisan.
I suspect that the only people supporting them are simply on the take.
To be fair, AI data center hate seems to be pretty bipartisan.
Yet so is support for it from politicians.
I suspect that the only people supporting them are simply on the take
Bingo.
Same with Ukraine support: Putin’s bullshit machine convinced idiots and their reps and now we’re half against Ukraine.
It’s the out of control growth, instant need, exempting themselves from pollution and noise controls, lack of respect for existing resources ….. it’s the way and the speed datacenters for LLMs are being pushed.
Datacenters are an important part of modern society but they are also high impact on the local economy so need to be planned accordingly.
I am 100% on board with hating Data Centres. But for those who don't know: a unevenly distributed variable load on the grid (EV charging) is a much bigger challenge than a localised somewhat constant load on the grid (Data Centres).
Still: should we build Data Centres with the power use comparable to that of small countries? Fuck no.
EV charging is also not that big
I read an estimate that full electrification, not just EVs, was projected to increase electrical load 1%/year ….. I don’t remember the data center equivalent but it was several times that
EVs are a highly modifyable variable load, as the vast majority personal vehicles sit idle nearly the whole day. When a fraction of those can be directed to charge based on grid needs, it becomes a net-asset for stability.
In Ontario, just the half-assed time-of-use pricing and small numbers of EVs in the fleet are likely contributing to the more more stable load over night. They used to have so much Nuclear surplus they were selling to NYC overnight at negative pricing on a regular basis.
My smart thermostat already has a capability of letting the power company make adjustments as needed to stabilize the grid. Is it really so hard to imagine the same functionality for EV charging?
Sometimes override the thermostat, because my house needs to be comfortable for occupants. But I can plug in my EV when I get home, and it has 12 hours to charge. On a typical day it might need two hours and I have no reason to care as long as it completes by morning
Also, home batteries and battery storage at public chargers can dampen the "shock" that the grid might face since it'll deliver power from the local storage that will then recharge at a constant rate from the grid
And just so we're really on the same page, just because something is a challenge doesn't mean it's a bad thing or shouldn't be done.
It's not like we didn't have the same problems with balancing the grid when people started installing electric ovens or Aircon or dishwashers or washing machines or pretty much any other heavy appliance you can think of.
In fact, did you know that if you were to install Solar and export production to the grid, that can cause the same problems? A lot of people seem to think that it's about how much power the grid can produce alone but there's a reason it's referred to as a "balance", too much input causes problems as well. Utilities need to plan energy production in advance to cope with an already variable demand, there are people who's entire job is predicting spikes and drops on consumption so they can figure out if they need to spin up or shut down entire power plants - both of which are expensive to do and any mistake will mean brownouts or worse, a collapsed grid. This isn't a new thing, it has been this way for decades.
If anything, EVs and EV chargers can be made a lot smarter than the above to actually help balance the grid.
My electric provider gives me cheap electric and a discount on my bill if I let them decide when the car charges (via controlling the car charger). I just tell them when I need the car to be fully charged by and they handle the scheduling. Do I care if the car charges at 2am instead of 9pm if it's fully charged by 7am either way? Absolutely not.
Better yet, V2X is starting to become a thing - this enables bi-directional charging for the EV. In other words, the EV itself actually helps balance the grid rather than just be a pure drag on it.
In the modern age, overall grid capacity is only a small part of the problem, what we need is a smarter grid. A smarter grid will cope with spikes in demand without forward planning and being cheaper overall for everyone.
Not to mention, I feel like this argument is based on everyone switching to EVs overnight. This could never happen unless someone has a magic lamp with genie, but I would hope the genie would address the power grid issues as part of the wish. Now a monkey's paw, on the other hand...
Any politician who can't, can be replaced by one who can. That door swings both ways.
Data centers are essential, but internet doesn't count as a utility. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
I always thought they meant the existing house services couldn't handle the load. Many older homes in my area would not be able to support an additional 5-12kW+, using Leviton's level 2 as an example.
Sure there are lots of charging options.
I'm assuming we're in the USA.
Also, I'm pro EV. Not a pro data center person.
I'm just trying to cover all the Lenny triggers.
Funny enough media was the only ones spewing that EVs couldn't be handled by the infrastructure. No facts, no research. Being in the utilities field, ask any colleague that our infrastructure is no where near capacity.
To be fair, it was only a few small areas that couldn't handle that kind of load, mostly because they couldn't handle the load they already had.
I think it's unlikely that data centers were built in those few areas.
Data centers are being built in precisely areas that can't handle them because the land+construction is cheapest.
I was referring to areas that couldn't handle their existing electrical load. In nearly all of those areas, the scarcity of electricity drives up the price, so it seems unlikely a data center would build there due to how high the ongoing power costs would be.
I hate to disappoint you, but data centers are driving up the price of electricity. This is a very well-documented phenomenon.
Data centers are driving up the price of electricity, but why would they build in a place where electricity was already extremely high?
My dude, data center owners are actually trying to stand up new nuclear facilities to fulfill their own demand. Doesn't matter if it's in New York or Wyoming: math's clearly not working out.
(FWIW I'm totally on board with new power infrastructure, but I don't trust these geniuses to build or maintain it)
Source? I'm pretty sure that those areas also have lower demand, which drives down the price.
I get the meme, but these really aren't the same issues - the current state of many residential grids potentially not being able to support the load of everyone charging electric vehicles is not the same problem as industrial power consumption being excessively high. A data center has it's own substation - some of them even have dedicated hv / uhv service. The risks they pose are completely different (and in the case of electric vehicles only situationally a valid concern, unlike with data centers)
the concern is also assuming everyone is doing fast charging at the same time at night, but in reality most overnight charging would use the power draw that is more similar to a space heater.
Yep! While broad statements are going to be broad around EVs, the reasonable average for actually charging a car overnight is closer to 5 kwh, and for some models it's up as high 10+ kwh. That much per household is a genuinely significant increase to the base load of a local grid, and given how rickety so much of the infrastructure in the US is, it 100% is a concern that municipal power companies are actively working to address. Most places do not have to do anything, but... that's not everywhere, and rural grids are pretty decrepit at this point. It's not insurmountable even a little, but we cannot simply have everyone switch to an electric car without some infrastructure work being done without real issues arising.
In a not-fascist timeline, there would be no problem. But the issue is that getting the funding for infrastructure work is... very difficult due to trump admin fuckery, and so they can cite that lack of infrastructure investment as the reason to not invest in infrastructure and electric cars. It's really just a whole comprehensive gift to grift they've created for themselves.
no comments (yet)