Looks more like a DSSL testing (which had dedicated cores/hardware) rather the actual potential. Also, one single title, wake me when there's a test to match everything SteamDeck can emulate (Switch 1 too)
post
The Switch 1 and 2 are kind of unbeatable in power efficiency, and I'm not surprised a port of CP2077 is running better on the Switch 2 than on the Steam Deck. I wish they used a better screen and bigger battery out the gate with the Switch 2, but there will no doubt be a mid gen refresh with those things.
I think if you have a lot of money for buying games that are only going to work on one system, the Switch 2 is a better product for people that want a system that just works out the box. Steam Deck is for people with patience and an existing library.
Isn't the Steam Deck already a few years old now? Is this even a fair comparison?
Until end of 2026 and the release of Deck 2, Switch 2 will be in a bit better position. Value remains on Steam Deck though.
They're roughly the same price so it's a fair comparison
But the games aren't the same price. And the policies ran by the companies aren't the same. I don't think Valve has ever said they're going to break your steam deck if you use it in a way they haven't deemed fit. And I'd question if you can mod games on the switch, like even games that normally support it.
I mean these comparisons are always a bit redundant to me. I get multiplatform games like that on steam, I use switch for Nintendo games and other casual stuff that I prefer to play handheld and are not super resource hogs.
The only people that this would affect are the extreme edge case where you have no PC or gaming laptop or Xbox/PS but have both a deck AND a switch 2 AND you don't care about the price difference and you really want the best handheld performance.
The potential extra optimization on consoles lessens the blow of paying a bit more.
I'm not so sure about that. I feel if you already have a steam library, a pc handheld is kinda hard to beat. Depending on what you like, you might already own every game you'll want for the Steam Deck. Even if you gotta buy everything new, Steam does sales more often and more aggressively than Nintendo.
If you're not into paying for things, you can pirate on the Steam Deck. Who knows when the Switch 2 will be jailbroken.
For me, now that there are viable Linux Handhelds, I think I'd kind of struggle to justify one running a proprietary OS.
I'm not saying the switch 2 edition is a better deal only that it is nice to see the developers be commissioned to squeeze more power with limited hardware. Modders can do the same however there isn't that many steam deck units to justify doing the same amount of work.
Except there are enough units out there that developers have been optimizing there games for the steam deck... They're many games that have gone from playable to verified and work significantly better due to the developers prioritizing make the game more optimized on the deck.
If you had watched the video you would see the Nintendo switch is much more energy efficient… The steam deck doesn’t win in every single way even if we may want it to.
Energy efficiency is not at all related to game optimization and how well it runs. Atleast in this sense.
When the software isn't efficient that's bad coding(not in this case), it has absolutely everything to do with optimization. No one is going to say a game is well-optimized if it drains your battery in 5 minutes. You need to have nuance and admit when your favorite thing doesn't win every in every metric. Lemmy has a steam deck circlejerk refusing to acknowledge that other handhelds may be better in some ways this is coming from someone would gladly to pick the SD over everything else.
I would love to know which games the deck and the Nintendo can both run and the Nintendo beats it at energy efficiency. Generally speaking you're not playing the game games on either device.
Oh good for you though, it wins 1 metric out of all the other advantages that a steam deck has, and is 3 years older
Oh yeah, I was thinking way more generally for some reason. I can certainly see that in isolation.
on steam at the moment, Cyberpunk is 20.99.
Switch 2 version is 69.99
👋thanks for trying nintendo.
If you know where to look, a certain athletic woman can give it to you for free if you're on a Steam Deck!
I don't know where to look. Please help
!piracy@lemmy.dbzer0.com is a good start on the sidebar
Wii fit trainer?
Or you could reward CDPR for maintaining support and releasing a wonderful DLC for it with a purchase on a platform that lets you own your games (and is incidentally owned by CDPR too)
While I agree that one should support developers of games they enjoy if they are able, I recently tried another playthrough of this game and it reminded me how unpolished it is.
Things like
- Quest NPCs taking very robot-like paths while walking (walk straight for 10 steps, turn right 90 degrees instantly, walk straight 5 steps...) instead of something more natural
- Needing to wait 5 minutes for an NPC to get to a specific spot and/or complete actions before being able to continue conversation. Typically on the fight missions, you'd win the fight, they'd take 30 s to get up, then saunter over (using an unnatural path) to the designated spot, which then took another 10 seconds to activate the speech option finally.
- Pedestrians diving into the road in front of your car instead of away.
Perhaps games like GTA spoiled us, but I just found these too annoying to continue.
Do you know how to use said athletic woman's installers on the Steam Deck, or Linux in general?
Sometimes adding the installer as a non-Steam game and running it through Proton works, otherwise I use Lutris. You can find tutorials online for setting it up to use with FitGirl's installers.
Although specifically for Cyberpunk 2077 I had issues with the install, so I found a no-install version, I believe from DODI.
Or for me it would make CP2077 and hundreds of other games free to play on the Steam deck (since I already own them)
Nintendo aren't the ones who set the price
At least e.g. steam can't arbitrarily choose to brick your colputer
no, they don't. but the game has been out for 5 years at this point.
articles like these seem quite pointless to anyone who doesn't already own a switch 2. and possibly pointless even to people who own a switch 2, but have already played cyberpunk on better or similar hardware.
this article is an attempt to pat a multi billion dollar company on the back so it doesn't feel as bad that people aren't racing out to buy their 5-year-late, overpriced attempts to dominate the handheld market again.
Possibly the dumbest take I've ever seen on this site, are you saying an article objectively comparing the performance of two handhelds is "an attempt to pat a multi billion dollar company on the back"?
articles like these seem quite pointless to anyone who doesn't already own a switch 2.
"Performance comparisons are pointless if the results aren't what I like", I'm sure if the steam deck performed a lot better you would be in the comments singing praises for it. Digital foundry have been comparing performance for many years but suddenly now their findings are worthless.
Yeah they'd never shill for Nintendo and fail to disclose it was an ad https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=V10wHzV5zp0
They disclosed it many times and have talked about that video often, it doesn't affect their content. I didn't like it either but acting like they're not trustworthy because of one time they were sponsored is dumb
They're literally selling faster than the original Switch, what the fuck are you smoking?
I don’t miss selling my two month old games for five dollars at GameStop.
Normally, I would agree with you. In the case of game keys, even though I have a physical cartridge now I have to make sure that servers are still up and available for me to download a game. So the massive market for retro games is kind of null and void if you’ve got a cartridge with nothing but a transferable license agreement on it and no way to actually get the game.

all 22 comments