Amazon founder Jeff Bezos drew ridicule on Wednesday after he claimed that doubling the amount of taxes he pays wouldn't be beneficial to society.

During an interview on CNBC, journalist Andrew Ross Sorkin asked Bezos about arguments made by Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) that the super-rich have lower effective tax rates than average Americans given how much of their wealth comes from unrealized capital gains and not traditional income earned through actual labor.

"I pay billions of dollars in taxes," replied Bezos, whom Forbes estimates is worth $267 billion. "If people want me to pay billions more, then let's have that debate. But don't pretend, you know, that that's going to solve the problem. You could double the taxes I pay, and it's not gonna help that teacher in Queens, I promise you."

Bezos on CNBC: "You could double the taxes I pay, and it's not gonna help that teacher in Queens. I promise you." pic.twitter.com/ocbf34XZhA
— Aaron Rupar (@atrupar) May 20, 2026

A 2021 investigation by Pro Publica found that Bezos' effective tax rate of less than 1% between 2014 and 2018, as he paid a total of $973 million in taxes over a period in which his net worth grew by $99 billion.

As explained by the Institute of Taxation and Policy (ITEP), this effective tax rate was "significantly lower" than the tax rate paid by middle-class Americans over that period.

"There were multiple years where Bezos paid nothing at all in income taxes," ITEP noted. "While having billions of dollars of wealth, Bezos consistently avoided income tax by offsetting earned income with other investment losses and various deductions, all while Amazon stock was rapidly rising."

Democratic congressional candidate Melat Kiros in Colorado suggested Bezos had a point about taxation—"because we tax income, not wealth.

"Bezos takes out a tiny salary, pays the income tax, and lives off loans borrowed against his stocks, basically tax-free," said Kiros. "They all do this and now 935 billionaires hold more wealth than 170 million Americans. It’s time to tax wealth."

Melanie D'Arrigo, executive director of the Campaign for New York Health, took issue with Bezos' claim that doubling his taxes would produce no benefits.

"Jeff Bezos paid $500 million for his super-yacht and $75 million for his super-yacht’s mini-yacht—both of which he’s allowed to write off on his taxes," she wrote in a social media post. "That alone would cover $180 in classroom supplies for every public school teacher in the US."

Craig Harrington, research director at Media Matters for America, marveled at how out of touch Bezos seemed to be.

"There’s a funny thing about being uber wealthy," he observed. "They get so rich that they lose all sense of place, they essentially manifest as stateless people with no connection to or understanding of the world outside their private airports and resplendent villas."

Journalist and screenwriter David Simon expressed a similar view of the impact of immense wealth on Bezos' psyche.

"Too much money contorts any human being," Simon wrote. "And what was once a man is now, for the rest of the world, a fully metastasized cancer."

Author Hemant Mehta, meanwhile, simply wondered if Bezos "auditioning to be the next Bond villain."


From Common Dreams via This RSS Feed.

all 6 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 6 points 5 months ago
[–] 6 points 5 months ago
[–] 5 points 5 months ago

Keep doubling it until he shuts the fuck up

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 5 months ago

    Well double them again

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 5 months ago

    Because 0*2=0

    98% should do.

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 5 months ago
    63 comments in c/aboringdystopia@mander.xyz view that post
    [–] 140 points 5 months ago (6 children)

    I agree with Bezos here. We should be taxing him dramatically more than double of what he's currently paying.

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 17 points 5 months ago (5 children)

    Double nothing is still nothing

    Bezos paying any tax at all would be an improvement

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 12 points 5 months ago (4 children)

    I think what he's referring to is that even if you taxed him more right now, that money would just go to funding the trump admin, bombs, and ICE...

    Just kidding, I don't think he actually cares about those things.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 112 points 5 months ago (1 child)
  • [–] 44 points 5 months ago*

    It would be a massive benefit to all of us even if we burned all of his money in a dumpster rather than redistributing it.

    Having billionaires who can buy elections or monopolize markets is inherently destabilizing to society. His dragon horde was captured by exploitation, and it should be returned to the people who actually earned it.

  • source
  • [–] 33 points 5 months ago (2 children)
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 23 points 5 months ago
    [–] 23 points 5 months ago

    Which is why we need a billionaire wealth tax too, and to close tax loopholes that allow the rich to pay close to nothing.

  • source
  • [–] 22 points 5 months ago
    [–] 20 points 5 months ago

    Or we could tax him at 75% and he'd still be filthy rich. Fuck these rich assholes.

  • source
  • [–] 18 points 5 months ago

    Well… under the current administration, one could argue that he’s right.

  • source
  • [–] 18 points 5 months ago

    "So please don't."

  • source
  • [–] 18 points 5 months ago (1 child)

    Nobody wants to double thentaxes on the uber wealthy. We want way way more than double. Personally, I like 100% on "wealth"/"net worth" over 10 million dollars.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 10 points 5 months ago

    After you hit $1 billion, just a total reset to 0. They're all pretty confident they can get there again easily, so shouldn't really be a problem. Enjoy your little spotlight in Forbes.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 17 points 5 months ago

    "This is why taxing me is bad..." - Rich Cunt

  • source
  • [–] 16 points 5 months ago (1 child)

    Why not then, as it won’t harm him either?

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 16 points 5 months ago (3 children)

    WHAT HAPPENED TO YOUR FACE

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 15 points 5 months ago

    Doubling his taxes won't do much.

    Taxing him at 50% will.

  • source
  • [–] 14 points 5 months ago

    two options, jackass

    1000003720

    or

    1000003721

  • source
  • [–] 14 points 5 months ago

    2 x 0 = 0

    So yeah. Of course it won't. All those loopholes and tax shelters they've paid to have written into the tax code need to be closed. They need to be taxed out of existence (as in billionaires shouldn't exist)

  • source
  • [–] 14 points 5 months ago

    You sure? Let's try it!

  • source
  • [–] 13 points 5 months ago

    Nothing times two is nothing.

  • source
  • [–] 13 points 5 months ago (1 child)

    How much would that be? Like $15?

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 13 points 5 months ago (1 child)

    Because the double of 0 it's still 0, tax those bastards

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 12 points 5 months ago

    I like Leeja Miller's line, taxes were the compromise.

  • source
  • [–] 12 points 5 months ago

    He is just saying he pays no taxes guys. Hands out the pitchforks

  • source
  • [–] 10 points 5 months ago
    [–] 8 points 5 months ago*

    So what you're saying is that we should be taking more, a LOT more? We should keep taking until it does help somebody?

    I can get down with that.

  • source
  • [–] 6 points 5 months ago

    Yes doubling it won't help it needs to be 33% flat for him and Amazon which is probably more than 5 times

  • source
  • [–] 6 points 5 months ago

    Let's find out.

  • source
  • [–] 5 points 5 months ago (1 child)

    Tax billionaires on the assets they control, till they're millionaires.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 5 points 5 months ago

    Which is why we need to quintuple it. And keep doubling it from there until morale has improved globally.

  • source
  • [–] 5 points 5 months ago

    Only one way to find out - whaddya say we give it a try, Jeff?

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 5 months ago

    Because multiplying zero results in zeros?

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 5 months ago

    I'd venture that setting his effective rate to the same as everybody else's would make the amount a lot more than double

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 5 months ago

    The only way that is true is if he pays none...gotta fix that.

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 5 months ago

    Financial obesity is an existential threat to any society that tolerates it, and needs to cease being celebrated, rewarded, and positioned as an aspirational goal.

    Corporations are the only ‘persons’ which should be subjected to capital punishment, but billionaires should be euthanised through taxation.

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 5 months ago

    Of course, that's why taxes for multi millionaires and upwards should be percentages based on income, civil contribution, participation and national financial participation (ie. Where is the money made v where is it spent or sequestered.)

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 5 months ago

    He has a point because currently Trump decides what gets done with taxes.

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 5 months ago
    [–] 2 points 5 months ago
    [–] 2 points 5 months ago*

    Double it AND enforce it too. Problem solved.

  • source
  • [+] 6 points 5 months ago* (4 children)
  • [–] 3 points 5 months ago (1 child)

    You also could have just not made this. This contributes nothing to the conversation.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (-1 replies)
  • [–] 0 points 5 months ago (1 child)

    Waste of water and an excess load on the power grid.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (-1 replies)
  • [–] 1 point 5 months ago

    I wonder what would help people, according to this tube steak.

  • source
  • 15 comments in c/usa@lemmy.ml view that post
    [–] 65 points 5 months ago (1 child)
  • [–] 37 points 5 months ago

    “Doubling” wasn’t exactly what we had in mind.

  • source
  • [–] 28 points 5 months ago

    That just means we have to tax him more

  • source
  • [–] 13 points 5 months ago

    one of the richest people on earth just rubbed our nose in the fact tht he doesnt pay his fair share? shocking

  • source
  • [–] 22 points 5 months ago (2 children)

    Ultra wealthy people don’t make their money through income but through the loophole of taking loans against their stock. That’s what needs to be taxed.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 12 points 5 months ago

    That, and they grossly underpay their workers, including by undoing the American tradition of subsidizing wages with benefits like healthcare, vacation time, childcare, education, etc. - healthcare shouldn't be tied to one's work load, but if it's going to be taken away, they should be paid by law enough to avoid falling on the state or emergency rooms or death avoidably, needlessly because billionaires want as much profit as possible at the expense of their worker's welfare.

    If a company and their owners are paying too little to their workers, if too many are on welfare, can't afford healthcare or the basic needs, the company and owners should be penalized so hard they are compelled to do what's right for the society they benefit and profit from though that labor and use of resources. If they fail, break up the company, sell it off, or close it down - just don't make the penalty a rounding error that becomes just the cost of doing business as usual.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 5 points 5 months ago

    Multiple ways, but that's one big one.

    To loan against stock they use the stock as collateral. So tax the use of collateral as if it was an advance on capital gains tax. They would pay about the same as if they sold directly but with more annoying paperwork because they have to pass extra audits and shit.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 8 points 5 months ago

    Well let's give it a shot and see what happens...

    Fucking hate billionaire parasites.

  • source
  • [–] 5 points 5 months ago (1 child)

    Give this guy enough money to launch his wife into low earth orbit on a penis shaped rocket, which is the sort of help society really needs.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 4 points 5 months ago

    You'd be amazed at how many Americans fight their way to work on a two-hour commute, struggle to pay rent on a shitty apartment, then go work a second job...and still they believe this line of bullshit.

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 5 months ago

    'You Could Double the Taxes I Pay' and It Won't Help Anyone…

    …I’d make sure of it”

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 5 months ago

    A well timed brick would if all else fails... 😇

  • source
  • [–] -2 points 5 months ago

    Even if we did tax ultra-billionaires more, that money would likely just be funneled into higher military spending.

  • source
  • 10 comments in c/usa@midwest.social view that post
    [–] 44 points 5 months ago

    Ok, then the solution seems to be to keep going higher until it does help someone. I'm very comfortable not stopping at double.

  • source
  • [–] 37 points 5 months ago

    Doubling 0% is still 0%. No wonder it doesn’t help anyone.

    Of course, he probably does pay some taxes, in which case, doubling that would obviously help people. He’s so full of shit.

  • source
  • [–] 23 points 5 months ago*

    So he’s just confirming that he pays way too little? If one of the richest people in the world would have zero impact doubling their taxes then the taxes are outrageously low, right?

    Like we all know this but it’s nice to see him admit it (even if he’s smug about it). And IDK why he thinks doubling is some wildly high threshold. Assuming he pays more than zero, I’m sure the population would be happy to keep hitting him with exponential increases until morale improves.

    They’ve forgotten that taxes were the compromise

  • source
  • [–] 15 points 5 months ago

    We weren’t thinking about “doubling”…

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 5 months ago (4 children)

    My solution is that everyone pays the same rate and let the billionaires set that rate. They’re good with the 30% or whatever it is we pay? Let them pay it too. I wonder what rate they’d set it at. 10? 5? That would be nice for us.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 5 months ago (2 children)

    Nah, it should absolutely scale upwards. If they lose the incentive to hoard more money because all the excess gets taken away, they'll have fewer opportunities to harm people.

    Of course, we should also remind them that the alternative would be guillotine.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • Sad but probably true... People need to quit thinking America as a culture, left or right, isn't the problem. Well tbf the problem is probably bigger than the nations... Nations are like businesses and just get used.

  • source