all 56 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 96 points 5 months ago (1 child)
  • [–] 39 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (2 children)

    Back in 1995, my family got our first computer, and despite being a kid at the time, computer maintenance fell in my lap because I quickly became the most tech-savvy person in the household.

    Computers in '95 still had a lot of rough edges and so I found myself needing to call tech support on occasion. On one such occasion I got a guy on the line who immediately jumped on the opportunity to be a dick because he could tell I was a kid.

    After describing my problem, he asked when the last time I ran a defrag was. (The problem had nothing to do with this.) When I replied that I didn't know what a defrag was, he busted out laughing for like a full minute, and I could hear him telling his buddy and they started laughing again. He also blamed my problem on this, of course.

    So yeah, that's my defrag story I guess.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 17 points 5 months ago

    Your background of being the family computer expert closely mirrors mine. However, I was too stubborn to ever call support, and instead stumbled through slow internet searches and manuals. Wild how much easier computers are to operate these days.

    Sorry for your bad support experience though. At least that hasn't changed!

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 7 points 5 months ago

    Ugh. MS-DOS 2.0-5.0 inclusive didn't have a defrag tool. It was introduced with dos 6. While it could be helpful, the fact that we went more than a decade without a defrag tool as part of DOS reinforces just how optional it was/is. The benefit of defragging was that it would be marginally faster to read a file that was stored contiguously instead of in pieces. There was the side benefit as well that it was easier to recover data that wasn't fragmented.
    I'm not aware of any legitimate 'Problems' caused by simple fragmentation itself. That tech guy was not just wrong in his behaviour, but also in his technical knowledge. What an ass.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 32 points 5 months ago
    [–] 28 points 5 months ago (12 children)

    It would take forever and I never could tell if it was worth it. Unlike the turbo button that allowed my pc to play myst in SD.

  • source
  • hideshow 12 child comments
  • [–] 36 points 5 months ago

    Fun fact is the turbo button wasn't actually turbo anything. It pressed in was the default and designed speed. When it was depressed it set it to run at a lower clock speed. This was meant for older games where aspects of the game like movement and attack speed were tied to the clock rate. With a high speed cpu the game was unplayable so you take off turbo mode and it mostly fixed the issues.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 18 points 5 months ago (2 children)

    I felt like the difference was only obvious if the disk had gotten really bad in the first place, but maybe it was just psychological from seeing the colors move around.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 5 months ago

    Looking back, honestly everything was so slow already I don't think it was noticable. When it takes 5 seconds to see an app a start to open vs 6 you doesn't notice much. Now with SSDs and such an extra second is like twice as long as it should take.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 9 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (5 children)

    Oh I just recently replayed Myst. Only outshined by Riven, such a great game.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 5 months ago (1 child)

    I still have my original 5 disc set of riven.I need to image those and mount them in 5 virtual CDroms so I'm not changing disks constantly.

    That game was hard as hell, I remember the last puzzle defeating me. Some of the clues were vague too. But man it was something.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 26 points 5 months ago (2 children)
  • [–] 39 points 5 months ago* (5 children)

    It used to save your hard drive. Now it will destroy your hard drive.

    Does this count as an historical irony?

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 18 points 5 months ago

    This is me reloading the dishwasher after someone tries to help

  • source
  • [–] 12 points 5 months ago (2 children)

    I still use Defrag for oldschool DOS/Win311/95/98 virtual machine disk images. After I've got the VM image set up the way I want, then I'll defrag it, then write a nulled out DUMMY.BIN to the root folder filling all the free space, then delete the DUMMY.BIN file.

    Doing that greatly improves compression of the final archived disk image.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 5 months ago

    Then installing Linux and wondering why I didn't have to do this...

  • source
  • [–] 7 points 5 months ago (1 child)

    me to gen Z:

    bullshit you dont defrag, you never fucking defragged

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 6 points 5 months ago (10 children)

    I still have an HDD, am I supposed to defrag it? I don't think I've ever done that.

  • source
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 5 months ago (7 children)
  • [–] 3 points 5 months ago (5 children)

    So it runs automatically in the background?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 5 months ago (4 children)

    If you're running NVME or SSD, you don't have to worry about fragmentation at all and neither will NTFS or Windows.

    On rotational media, recent versions of windows do it when it needs it. NTFS itself has become better about not splitting up files when there's contiguous space available.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 5 months ago (3 children)

    I have two 10 terabyte external hard drives that go whirr (so I assume there are platters in there). Do they need a defrag? I'm running Windows 11.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 5 months ago*

    Defrag is usually only for drives that are written to and data deleted often, creating gaps. If it's just storage, probably ok. I've got 4x 20TB drives in my truenas, but it's zfs, from what I've read, can't or don't need to defrag.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 5 months ago (1 child)

    Need? Probably not unless they're nearly full. Get some benefit from? at least a little. NTFS and 11 try to keep fragmentation at bay without killing your disk. New writes that won't fit in a hole are pushed ahead of the platter until they will.

    Go run optimize drives, it'll tell you what the state is

    https://www.elevenforum.com/t/optimize-and-defragment-drives-in-windows-11.3212/

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 6 points 5 months ago

    I'm glad I own a NAS with magnetic hard drives because that disk read/write sound just brings me peace and memories of falling asleep to that sound.

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 5 months ago
    [–] 7 points 5 months ago (1 child)

    not quite neckbeard, but...

    dos tetris (easy mode)

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 5 points 5 months ago

    This is the defrag I remember most. Back on a 286/386 it would really make a noticable difference in how fast files and programs would be found and loaded. From my Pentium-based Windows 95 machines and onwards I never noticed quite the same impact of defragging my drives.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 3 points 5 months ago
    [–] 3 points 5 months ago

    Fortunately life is better now

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 5 months ago

    I remember having to use Norton for that.

  • source
  • [–] 5 points 5 months ago (1 child)

    Fuck all of this 🤣. It would take so fucking long with that full disk and swapping. I guess that's a memory haha

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 5 months ago

    Oh yeah... 🤔😃

  • source