Sorry, this is a screed.

Read part of it, lots of claims with few sources. Maybe its better to focus on fewer parts at a time with better sourcing. Maybe across a series of posts which are explicitly linked.

If its aimed at Hanson then maybe they could be named Red Earth to Hanson, Part: n

As this post has come out, its fairly un-readable, with so many claims that would require checking, and then evaluating if theres another reading of those claims, etc. I'm not saying theres any false claims in there btw, none stood out to me, but theres claim after claim with little sourcing and in an out of context, abstracted form. Context around data and details is important.

I think the post, the length and lack of context of details undermines a broader message you're trying to communicate. But it could be the start of something substantial.

My good gentleperson, this is the biggest TL;DR I've ever not read on Lemmy.

If you want people to engage with it at this length, you at minimum need headings (use #, ##, ### for headings), a SUMMARY at the beginning and conclusion at the end, and ideally a table of contents.

What you've currently got is unreadable because there's no structure, nothing to indicate what the point you're trying to make is without reading an enormous post. You need something succinct to draw a reader in.

Vaguely, I'm guessing you're trying to stay: the government is currently dropping the ball so badly people will be desperate enough to consider One Nation?

(Note: I haven't read the whole thing, skimmed bits)

Sorry friend, just being honest.

Didn't read