all 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 16 points 6 months ago (1 child)

Domenico Losurdo wrote a book about that, “Western Marxism: How it was Born, How it Died, How it can be Reborn”: https://mronline.org/2025/01/11/domenico-losurdo-western-marxism-how-it-was-born-how-it-died-how-it-can-be-reborn/

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 3 points 6 months ago (4 children)

    What is the origin of that word and it's particular usage in this context btw?

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 22 points 6 months ago (3 children)

    "Tankie" is a word that originates from British communist circles in the 50s. It was used by communists who opposed the Soviet invasion of Hungary to derisively describe their comrades who supported the invasion. Photos in the British newspapers and such showed a lot of imagery Soviet tanks rolling through Budapest, hence "tankie".

    So, it has its origins as a silly sounding, incredibly niche, bit of British slang. It faded into obscurity after this, but got picked up again by leftists on the internet as a way of poking fun at each other. It's a funny sounding word and all. At a certain point over the last decade or so, it's breached containment, and liberals, especially here on Lemmy, love to throw it around without really having a firm idea what they mean by it. I've seen everyone from Marxist-Leninists, to Anarchists, to liberal Pro-palestian activists, all called "Tankies".

    OP is using the term here to poke fun at that vague liberal usage. As many liberals, at least here on Lemmy, would look at the calculus of, "US foreign policy is more erratic and dangerous than that of China" and declare it a "tankie" talking point, or "simping for authoritarianism", as though making an observation about different nation's foreign policy approaches says anything else about ones opinions of those states other policies or actions.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 6 months ago (2 children)

    Okay, so if I'm understanding correctly, it was a term coined by communist pacifists as a dig against more militant communists. However, now it has now evolved so that center leaning liberals are just chucking it towards both right and left so long as either is slightly militant?

    Hope I have that right. Thank you very much for the explanation!

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 6 months ago

    Essentially, in its modern context, it's used against anti-imperialists and those who support existing socialist countries. Those using it as a pejorative have a different view of these countries and thus see "tankies" as defending the indefensible, while "tankies" tend to have more depth of knowledge going against the hegemonic grain.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 5 points 6 months ago

    The people who initially coined it weren't necessarily pacifists, they just disagreed with how the Soviets conducted themselves in Eastern Europe. But otherwise yeah, you've got it.

    Tankie mostly gets used by centrist liberal types to punch left, but I've seen Tucker Carlson's weird Russia sycophancy get called Tankie once or twice also ¯_(ツ)_/¯

  • source
  • parent
  • [+] -10 points 6 months ago (9 children)
  • [–] 18 points 6 months ago* (3 children)

    And here I thought liberals loved choosing the lesser evil, smh

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 6 months ago

    Do you really think that your arguments are somehow well thought out points and don’t scream propagandist mill?

    I think you guys never have a compelling response to them and always, 100% of the time, end up saying some version of "These are the Bad Guy Ideas and I don't have to entertain them, because you are self-evidently Bad Guys and also mentally ill."

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 0 points 6 months ago

    Who gives a shit what people call you, just follow your code and keep to your morals.

  • source
  • [+] -17 points 6 months ago (6 children)

    Wow I sure am seeing a lot of thinly veiled "but what about" and "that's just propaganda you're being lied to by your government and people online and no I will not provide you with anything other than mockery because lmao amiriteguyz" in these comments

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 21 points 6 months ago (1 child)

    Citations Needed podcast:
    Whataboutism - The Media's Favorite Rhetorical Shield Against Criticism of US Policy

    Since the beginning of what’s generally called ‘RussiaGate’ three years ago, pundits, media outlets, even comedians have all become insta-experts on supposed Russian propaganda techniques. The most cunning of these tricks, we are told, is that of “whataboutism” – a devious Soviet tactic of deflecting criticism by pointing out the accusers’ hypocrisy and inconsistencies. The tu quoque - or, “you, also” - fallacy, but with a unique Slavic flavor of nihilism, used by Trump and leftists alike in an effort to change the subject and focus on the faults of the United States rather than the crimes of Official State Enemies.

    But what if "whataboutism" isn’t describing a propaganda technique, but in fact is one itself: a zombie phrase that’s seeped into everyday liberal discourse that – while perhaps useful in the abstract - has manifestly turned any appeal to moral consistency into a cunning Russian psyop. From its origins in the Cold War as a means of deflecting and apologizing for Jim Crow to its braindead contemporary usage as a way of not engaging any criticism of the United States as the supposed arbiter of human rights, the term "whataboutism" has become a term that - 100 percent of the time - is simply used to defend and legitimizing American empire’s moral narratives.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 21 points 6 months ago* (3 children)

    What point are you trying to make? A country that commits some of the most heinous atrocities in recent history and has serious flaws in their society like racism and inequality does NOT get to dictate and police others on these matters, especially in matters of morality. It's completely ironic and hypocritical and not to mention reeks of chauvinism.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [+] -8 points 6 months ago (5 children)

    I don't think the recently published map really supports this, it seems to be more between Russia and USA than China and USA

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] [S] 29 points 6 months ago (1 child)

    Someone in the comments on [the other site] called me a tankie for arguing that the USA has done way worse things than China in recent history, which prompted the meme. Apparently China shooting missiles into Taiwan waters is just as bad as the US bombing schoolgirls or something.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 19 points 6 months ago (2 children)

    It's not even between Russia and USA, the only people who see Russia as a bigger threat are Europeans. Even Americans now realize they're the baddies.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [+] -7 points 6 months ago (17 children)
  • [–] 33 points 6 months ago (7 children)
  • [+] -18 points 6 months ago (6 children)

    All of which 100% excuses everything they are doing today.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 18 points 6 months ago (2 children)
  • [+] -10 points 6 months ago (1 child)

    Hundreds of thousands committed by DPRK during the war. http://m.monthly.chosun.com/client/news/viw.asp?nNewsNumb=200302100069

    Just to be clear, S. Korea and the UN/US also committed war crimes, I’m not denying that.

    As for what goes on in the DPRK since the war, not sure what sources I can offer that you will actually believe. I readily admit that the US is guilty of crimes against humanity at home and abroad. Can you say the same for the СССР, Russian Federation, PRC, DPRK, etc.?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 17 points 6 months ago

    The South was and still is under US occupation. Rhee led a fucking massacre on Jeju island against any suspected communists. The US and puppet Rhee suppressed any movement for independence and even today you can not express any sympathy for DPRK in occupied South. The military leader of the South is a US commander.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] [S] 17 points 6 months ago (6 children)

    Oh, wow. Baited someone that argues about where Rus culture was born 1000 years ago and its relevance to modern events.

    Couldn't have asked for a better example of chauvinism.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [+] -9 points 6 months ago (4 children)

    What does any of this have to do with chauvinism, btw? Isn’t chauvinism about sexism? Genuinely curious.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] [S] 14 points 6 months ago (2 children)

    https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/chauvinism

    2: undue partiality or attachment to a group or place to which one belongs or has belonged

    3: excessive or blind patriotism

    Arguing if you or another group is the rightful heir of a culture falls under definition 2) or possibly 3)

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [+] -9 points 6 months ago (1 child)

    Ok thanks, guess I was mixing it up with misogyny.

    To be clear I’m not of any kind of Slavic heritage, just familiar with the history of the Kievan Rus and the purposeful campaign by Muscovy to take that name and then erase Ukrainian language and culture.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment