Schedule 1, Peak, and REPO lead a big year for small games

all 67 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 57 points 6 months ago

Indy and small budget games are where all the innovation in game mechanics is occuring. The AA/AAA industry has become a conveyor belt of ever more expensive graphics on the "omni game" mechanics.

  • source
  • [–] 46 points 6 months ago (5 children)

    Like, I appreciate the effort that goes into big AAA releases. I really do. I get wrapped up in the stories a lot easier when the game is nice to look at and the voice actors are really good.

    But if a game isn’t fun, it isn’t fun. A lot of indie games are fun first, and that makes all the difference in the world.

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 15 points 6 months ago* (3 children)

    "AA" games can look fantastic though, with incredible voice acting.

    See: Expedition 33.


    I think "too much budget" is a thing. There's just a point where it hurts more than helps, and now AAAAs (as I dub them) are smacking into it.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 6 months ago (2 children)

    I'm still waiting for a decent sale on Expedition 33 before I buy it.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 6 months ago*

    Large game studios have different inherent strengths than smaller game studios, unfortuntately I think much of the gaming world has forgotten this in the excitement about the collapse of competency in and enshittification of traditional video game companies "clearing the way" for indie game companies.

    I love indie games but some types of games can only be made by large predictable sort of boring game companies, I am mostly uninterested in those games but even I can recognize that they fulfill an essential role in making big production approachable, eye-catching experiences that play like interactive movies with all the production muscle that entails. Also sports games that evolve to remain relevant to the sports they represent are another big example of games best made by large boring game companies, which isn't to say that indie sports games aren't cool too that isn't the point.

    An indie game company can't make Red Dead Redemption 2, they can make a narrower more focused game like Read Dead 2, but the scope of a game like that requires a huge company of artists working in parallel rather than in individual competition with one another.

    A perfect example is comparing recent Zelda games to similar indie games like TUNIC, Gedonia 1 and 2, Anodyne 1 and 2 or Oceanhorn 1 and 2.

    All of these games have a unique style and individuality that only comes from smaller indie studios, but none of them can compare to the breadth, muscle and expansiveness of a Nintendo open world game.

    https://store.steampowered.com/app/553420/TUNIC/

    https://store.steampowered.com/app/2566340/Gedonia_2/

    https://store.steampowered.com/app/234900/Anodyne/

    https://store.steampowered.com/app/877810/Anodyne_2_Return_to_Dust/

    https://store.steampowered.com/app/339200/Oceanhorn_Monster_of_Uncharted_Seas/

    https://store.steampowered.com/app/1622710/Oceanhorn_2_Knights_of_the_Lost_Realm

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 36 points 6 months ago (11 children)

    Valheim, factorio, timberborn gave much more hours of fun than some expensive games like GTA 5.

  • source
  • hideshow 11 child comments
  • [–] [S] 10 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (3 children)

    Timberborn is a lot of fun, you can build some crazy worlds when you reach the end game.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 6 months ago (2 children)

    Timberborn is a definite favorite of mine. Whiskerwood looks very similar. I haven't had a chance to try it yet, but I'm thinking I may like it more than Timberborn in the long-run due to having more interesting end-game goals to work toward.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 6 months ago (1 child)

    I played whiskerwood for the first time recently. Also thought it would be similar to timberborn but it is very different. You have manage the whiskers individually to give them the right job if you want them to be efficient. I like that you can build underground and that in later game you'll be able to use belts so I'm looking forward to discovering that system, also the steam power stuff.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 5 points 6 months ago (4 children)

    Their current full price is slightly over $30, but Rimworld, Stellaris, and Satisfactory are in this bucket for me too.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 6 months ago (3 children)

    Stellaris full price is like $300 for the whole game , sure I literally got the base game for free, but even buying expansions on sale, I wouldn't be surprised if I've spent over $100 on Stellaris, and I don't have all the expansions as I only buy them on sale.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 6 months ago* (1 child)

    That's a good point. I typically wait for massive sales before buying games and DLCs, but I've still probably spent more than I care to admit on Stellaris. The enjoyment per dollar ratio is definitely still way up there for me though.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 6 months ago

    Oh, definitely. I still chuckle occasionally when I'm reminded by my Dungeon Defender friends that they cannot fathom playing a single game that takes weeks to finish. Meanwhile I'm laughing in EvE Online veteran. Titan Construction V took 8 months to train.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 25 points 6 months ago

    Silksong launched at €20.

    I could buy the best game of a generation at full price FOUR TIMES, or Forspoken once. Tough choice

  • source
  • [–] 23 points 6 months ago (1 child)

    LOL. More like "triple A" studios need to start making games that are actually fun rather than focus on quarterly peanut accounting practices while giving management bloated salaries and bonuses. Also fix up that abusive shitty 'cram' development cycle culture that's entrenched in game development.

    Games like Vampire Survivors and Balatro show that games can be fun without many visual frills, but contain depth beyond the standardized, uninspiring, recycled game mechanics. While if you go the length of being true to storytelling like Baldur's Gate, Divinity OS2, rather than sloppy storywriting, people are willing to pay bigger bucks for it.

    Somewhere along the way, during the mobile games boom, studios forgot about what actually made games 'fun'. They started to go after micro-transactions to drain every last dollar in your wallet while delivering barely any substance that was 'fun'. They deserve to die given the current trajectory. They forgot the meaning of what video games are.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 16 points 6 months ago (1 child)
  • [–] 14 points 6 months ago (1 child)

    To recoup lost revenue on declining sales, major publishers will be raising the base price for games to $90, with extended 'complete' editions retailing $145.

    Says, major CEO "gamers need to stop alienating themselves and pay up. When sales increase the prices will go down stop increasing (as much... maybe)."

    Beatings will resume until morale improves.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 13 points 6 months ago (13 children)

    I just got Vintage Story last week for $24, and that's gonna last me literally until either the world ends, the Dev team disbands for some reason, or I die.

    It's still in early access, but there's already TONS in the game that you may not even see depending on your world spawn.

  • source
  • hideshow 13 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 6 months ago (7 children)

    I've been eyeing Vintage Story for a while. What are you liking most about it?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 6 months ago (5 children)

    Not the previous commenter. I have been enjoying learning a ton about real world geology from the game. Also as a IRL blacksmith, the smithing and smelting mini games are surprisingly correlative.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 6 months ago (4 children)

    Ah, I've seen the progression and survival mechanics are pretty deep, but the IRL perspective is cool. Thanks!

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 6 months ago (3 children)

    Just kinda ignore the Lovecraftian horrors, I haven't seen those IRL, lol.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 6 months ago (2 children)
  • [–] 2 points 6 months ago (1 child)

    You can turn off the "temporal stability" mechanic so it plays more similar to classic Minecraft, but imo it adds to the atmosphere of the game.

    There are also plenty of options and settings when you set up a world so it can be as easy or hard as you want.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 6 months ago

    I've kinda been going at it at my own pace. I started a survival world, but I'm actually using creative to learn how to build and how the different mechanics work. I just started messing with windmills yesterday, but I think I may be getting a little ahead of myself.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 6 months ago (4 children)

    Why would you stop playing it if they disband?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 6 months ago (2 children)

    Even if it's not a big part of the total experience, knowing a game's story will be eternally unfinished can make the whole thing feel hollow. That's my experience at least. Per the wiki, it looks like Vintage Story is planned to have 8 chapters of story and development is currently at 2.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 6 months ago (1 child)

    The game was great before it even had a story

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 6 months ago*

    Good to know. I can't speak for OP, but I'm one of those people for whom a good gameplay loop alone isn't enough. I need some lasting justification in long-term progression, story and world-building, or whatever, so anything that weakens those can kill a game for me. (And yes, I basically can't make myself interested in roguelikes.) It sounds like Vintage Story is propped up enough by its progression for the rest to not matter though.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 6 months ago

    I'm not saying I'd stop playing if they disband, but it would probably prevent others from being able to play it in the future unless they went open source with it.

    Also it'd mean future support just wouldn't be there, such as their on-site mod database and account system.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 10 points 6 months ago (2 children)

    Consoles are the rich man's platform these days. If you have a bit of technical know-how, it's not hard to find a cheap old PC and get some games running on it.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 6 months ago (1 child)

    Weren't they always?

    When I grew up, the surgeon's kid had an Xbox, the software engineer's kid had a PS, and everyone else pirated PC games or got them from the bargain bin.

    I got the whole Blitzkrieg Anthology for the equivalent of 5 EUR

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 8 points 6 months ago

    smaller games that are fun have a better chance of getting bought on a whim, who knew!

  • source
  • [–] 6 points 6 months ago

    Can't even remember the last time I spent over £30 on a game tbh.

  • source
  • [–] 5 points 6 months ago

    People who haven't gotten raises to keep up with cost of living are buying cheaper indie games that are fun and supported instead of 80 AAA games that are abandoned because they didn't make all of the money.

    Gee, shocker.

  • source
  • [–] 5 points 6 months ago (4 children)

    Most of my library is indie games but I'm really looking forward to CONTROL Resonant and the 007 game (love me some Hitman).

    I'm happy to pay the premium for graphics/voice acting/whatever if the game is actually fun. A shame that so many AAA developers forget about that last part.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 6 months ago (3 children)

    CONTROL Resonant

    I forgot about that one. I really liked the first one, more for the worldbuilding and atmosphere than the gameplay, so I'm interested in Resonant, but not confident that I'll like it. I'll have to see some gameplay before I can tell. Bring back Threshold Kids!

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 6 months ago (2 children)

    It was also the first game I ever played where the ray tracing didn't feel like a gimmick. I didn't even notice it for most of the game and then when I did, I really appreciated how much it was adding to the atmosphere.

    I want to play Alan Wake 2 but I don't want to install Epic.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 6 months ago

    Too many big studios/publishers just keep releasing the same shit over and over and over. They don't innovate, they don't take risks; they don't exist to make good games, they exist to make shareholders money.

    Good games aren't just about graphics, they are about game play. Game play involves mechanics like collecting, exploration, story, strategy, challenging bosses, and world building/crafting. A good game will do 2-3 of these things really well regardless of what the graphics look like.

  • source
  • [–] 6 points 6 months ago

    Steam sales. That's where I'm at.

    Epic Game Store also gives away some AAA freebies.

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 6 months ago

    I very rarely get $60-$70 games at full price any more. The last 3 were Assassin's Creed Shadows, Pirate Yakuza in Hawaii, and Crimson Desert.

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 6 months ago

    I just splurged and bought Moonlighter for like 2.99 so yeah checks out i guess.

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 6 months ago

    I MIGHT buy a new $30 game if there is no DRM. A DRM'ed game, at $12? No way.

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 6 months ago

    With Steam, there is probably more low cost tittle. I mean normally or in the public.

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 6 months ago

    I've been on an incremental kick lately, those are usually cheap as hell, and addictive

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 6 months ago

    People like getting their money's worth out of their hobbies? Never would have guessed.

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 6 months ago

    Pretty soon they'll notice that Pac-Man is still pretty good. Lol.

  • source
  • [+] -13 points 6 months ago (6 children)

    Because a lot of indie games don't come to consoles (or at least Xbox — I see a lot of Steam/PlayStation releases or Steam/Switch releases).

    I see a ton of cool indie games I'd love to play, but I can't because they require Windows. I don't think a game should be able to be called indie if it requires you to use Windows (or macOS, what I use), exclusively. Like if you're "independent" of Windows (macOS or Linux) or "independent" of Apple (Windows or Linux), they should be making their game available to you. That means, of course, supporting all three platforms. Linux and macOS are both based on UNIX (if you go back far enough). Switch and Mac use the same CPU architecture (ARM64). Linux has the best handheld support. And Windows has the biggest install base. So it's really worth it to support all four of those. And then Xbox and PlayStation use the same architecture as PC gaming, x86-64 with a GPU. So it's really all connected and, unless one platform is sponsoring the game somehow (at which point, it isn't indie), no platform's players should be left out. JMO

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 21 points 6 months ago

    "Indie" doesn't refer to independence from a platform, it's supposed to mean independently published (in other artistic industries, this has become slightly muddled as "indie" is more of an aesthetic these days). The fact that these games are directly supported on one platform over others is a symptom of being indie more than anything, as a large publisher would require support on multiple platforms to ensure maximum market penetration.

    Also, proton is incredible these days, so windows lock in isn't as much of a thing anymore.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 6 points 6 months ago*

    If you have an x86 cpu Mac, install Linux, use steam/proton and you can play pretty much any indie Windows game out there. Or you can just install Windows. If you have an Apple cpu Mac, there are still tools out there you can use to play the game.

    You can't fault Indie devs who have a day job for not wanting to spend time supporting a ton of different platforms (AAA, is a different story)

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 6 months ago (1 child)

    You're only about 10 years too late for anyone to give a single crap about native linux

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 6 months ago

    Proton's a little more recent than that. I still remember the bad old days of Steam on Linux from 2013-2017 where Proton didn't exist yet, and running the Windows version of Steam through WINE was a PITA. Heck, Proton didn't really start to get good until about 2021.

  • source
  • parent