no comments (yet)

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
there doesn't seem to be anything here
14 comments in c/ausfinance@aussie.zone view that post
[–] 5 points 6 months ago (4 children)

There should be an mutually tied tax for this. When the rate goes up for borrowers so does the tax on retirement savings. It's bullshit to hit the people with the most expenses only.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] [S] 1 point 6 months ago (1 child)

    We could also not hit people with mortgages at all. In the US all mortgages are fixed-rate for the whole term of the loan.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 3 points 6 months ago

    Just raise it. Inflation is awful.

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 6 months ago (2 children)

    There needs to be more than one interest rate.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 6 months ago

    There already is. The RBA only sets the "cash rate". Your mortgage isn't at the cash rate, and neither are the loans businesses take out. They're influenced by it, and a lot of banks will essentially have their rates rise and fall in lockstep with it, especially for regular people who don't have the negotiating power to lock in special agreements, but they don't have to.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 6 months ago (2 children)

    That will stop people wasting so much money on checks notes fuel and food. In the RBA's defence, they are damned either way, and they have no other influence mechanism.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 6 months ago

    The (RBA’s) problem is we’re all too rich

    The bank’s fight against inflation is much harder due to the extraordinary boom in household wealth, which is keeping the economy motoring along. Expect interest rates to stay high.

    https://slrpnk.net/post/37557537

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 6 months ago

    Por que no los dos?

  • source