There have been tense exchanges in the Federal Court, with the judge overseeing the bombshell case between the ACCC and Woolworths questioning the consumer watchdog's case.

all 4 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 3 points 6 months ago

Hmmm, did they ever accidentally chargw less?

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 6 months ago

    This judge has demonstrated some questionable reasoning with these comments.

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 6 months ago

    I guess even supermarkets need a pet.

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 6 months ago

    This judge sounds dumb as fuck. That's not a matter of fact, and just opinion, so you can sue me, you absolute fuckhead.

    This is proof that the ACCC is a paper tiger who can't actually protect consumer rights. Because the courts are just very heavily favoured to moneyed interests.

    This is just one case in a long, long list of cases that end up this way.

    The law just gets ignored.

  • source