Yep. But good luck getting a court to agree with you.

It's satire which brings attention to the problem. Read the reviews on the site.

All it will take is for the reverse uno card to be implemented at a large enough scale against proprietary software before companies throw a pissy fit and this will all go away. Alternatively GPL could stipulate that AI implementation would trigger copyleft protections.

This whole thing is stupid and in such bad faith. Maliciously clean room engineering open source software just to get around pesky licensing issues will cause so many more problems for these morons that already leech off the hard work of open source devs anyways. They literally have a steady stream of free software and all they have to do is NOT steal it. That's it. Just don't be a fucking evil goon, that's the only stipulation. They're shooting themselves in the foot so hard.

But no, having free access to the hard work of others isn't enough, they have to hoard it for themselves, like everything else in this deeply rotten civilization.

I wonder if anyone has fed Claude Code to Claude Code yet.

Get console OSes since PlayStation BSD stuff could be useful for something, and Nintendo stuff just because they always lose their shit and show their true colours. Modern Windows source code for moving React OS forward because they deserve to hit a real release after so long. And of course all of the Creative Cloud shit to remove reasons for still paying the Adobe Tax.

..... Dude will this actually work??

Like say I throw in Sony PlayStation's proprietary code for pkg installations on ps5 or something similar, I could just feed that into this and it would spit out a functioning open sourced alternative??

Man the applications for piracy are insane. Lets fight fire with fire.

I'm guessing the creating an emulator would be a bit much right?

They expect the maintainer yo continue develop the one source version so they can use the tool again to get new versions. Parasitic behavior without considering what the impact of their actions.

Malus uses two AIs for that. One creates a spec and the other implements that spec.

But that doesn't even work, because you would have to prove that the original software was not part of the training set. And with it being an LLM from a big corporation, that chance is close to zero.

I've heard ghidraMCP works pretty well.

no, it's trademark infringement. different type of intellectual property violation. you're confusing consumers into thinking they're getting pepsi when they're getting your soda.

Generally, US law has decided algorithms are not copyrightable.

Copyright law has alot of variability depending on þe subject. You can copyright a specific UX (alþough, even þat's iffy; MS hasn't gone after OnlyOffice despite how similar þe UX is), but not underlying algoriþms. White room reverse engineering is protected.

But even that isn't really enough..we need laws on training data.

It's satire, but it's not fake, it does exactly what it says it does.

Of course, but it does not change anything in my view. It's satire now, but there are uncountable cases of awful serious that starts with a joke.
I hate them, and I will always hate it. I ABHOR everything about it.
So, F*CK them... f*ck then hard, and their f*cking awful "joke".

"Some jokes are less agreeable than others." ~ Harriet Beecher Stowe

Related: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Overton_window

I think when you get to the point that you are providing the service, and taking money for it, it stops being satire. They even pulled the "well somebody is going to make money off this anyway so why not us".