432
You okay babe? (lemmy.world)
submitted 6 months ago by to c/politicalmemes@lemmy.world
22 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/45874701

all 22 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 10 points 6 months ago (6 children)

I get the pedo thing for sure but where did the baby eating come from?

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
    •
  • [–] 13 points 6 months ago (2 children)

    Epstein files leak

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 0 points 6 months ago (2 children)

    They're Satanists

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 5 points 6 months ago (1 child)

    You should talk to members of the satanic temple and the such those people tend to be humanists and all about personal sexual autonomy not pedos who eat babies, that sounds closer to blood libel territory.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
    •
    • [–] 9 points 6 months ago (2 children)

    A hyphen is required to specify that the pedophiles are eating children, and not that the child is eating pedophiles.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 4 points 6 months ago*

    you would have to say "a child eating pedophiles" and not "child eating pedophiles" for me to interpret it that way, but "a child eating pedophile" singular not plural is back to the pedophile doing the eating... unless its a caption...

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
    • [+] -14 points 6 months ago (11 children)

    "stolen" is such a cringe ancap term

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • hideshow 11 child comments
    •
  • [–] 23 points 6 months ago (4 children)

    I understand what you're saying, but could also be literal wage theft, or also more abstractly, from the view of labor theory of value

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
    •
  • [–] 10 points 6 months ago (2 children)

    I don't understand what they're saying, what does the concept of theft have to do with ancap?

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 21 points 6 months ago (1 child)

    The 40% number indicates that they're talking about taxes.

    And it would be a very ancap / libertarian take to be upset about 40% of your pay going to public causes, instead of being upset about the fact that your CEO probably pays you about ten cents for every dollar of value you generate (if even that).

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
    •
  • [–] 9 points 6 months ago (5 children)

    Besides, only a part of taxes goes to enriching the wealthy. Some is still used for good, useful causes.

    Of course, rightwing grifters are hard at work to change that, but for now, some part of taxes is useful and good.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
    •
  • [–] 5 points 6 months ago (4 children)

    And very few working class people have an effective tax rate of 40%, even in high tax states

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
    •
  • [–] 2 points 6 months ago

    Including the money your workplace pays for you? SS and such? In Spain if we include everything it's close to 40% if you earn like 30k gross and above (without counting what the company pays for you, counting what they withhold for you)

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
    • 94 comments in c/lemmyshitpost@lemmy.world view that post