The discourse it generates is inherently combative and primed for culture war. Which is true of most social media but for twitter's structure it's also literally nothing else. It's only the follower count, only the quote-reply, only the callout. No other intrinsic value.
post
If we exclude Musk, no, it's not worse than Instagram. Musk is a pretty big deal tho. Now, the Zucc is pretty evil too, so anyway I'd say Instagram and Facebook are fair contenders for worst platform.
Personally I deleted Twitter as soon as the purchase by Elongated Muskrat was confirmed. I deleted Facebook and Instagram more recently (I hesitated longer because I was using it more to communicate with irl acquaintances). I still use WhatsApp, until I can get some people I need to keep in contact with to start using Signal or Telegram (I know I'm not gonna get them on Matrix or xmpp, not worth trying), but it's also owned by the Zucc so it bothers me to keep using it.
We're noy excluding Elon, because he pushes fashist shit.
all zuck property also did and way before his trump sucking cause they discover it create more engagement. U hadf a study on the matter. It s an interestiong read. Also that pov often doesnt acknowledge wich create the discourse, the user or the social network
The thing is...
You're telling people that don't use Twitter or Instagram that because Instagram is bad it means twitter is ok.
This would be a discussion you should have on Instagram, with people who do not use Twitter.
When you tell it to people here who (hopefully) use neither, the response will always be:
Just don't use either.
For me Mastodon is better than Twitter ever was, you can have real social interactions there, Twitter had too many people shouting for attention. I believe more by the day that smaller social media is better.
that s a good point, but wich also come with his downside. I mean on twitter i can have interraction with multiple ppl on some subject etc here it s less likely. To follow dev and other project i feel twitter work great
I'd say there's an optimum number of people, you're less likely to have meaningful interactions with a very high number of people. Mastodon is a lot closer to that optimum.
on some subject u can't even have a conversation cause u dont enough users. I will never ask tech question on some subject here or for that matter on a lot of subject. Quick exemple if i need to know how to make proton run under wayland of origin games, even with and higher count that normal linux users here im not sure i will get an answer
Everyone good left and the algorithm shows you a bunch of shit about how male loneliness is because women who don't want to fuck op are allowed outside.
odly specific. Saw a lot of ragebait tweeet on gender issue like that and when we were abble to check where the account were based of it was always comming from third world place where they farm controversial takes for monetary gain. Glad i have none of those now. But yeah the monetization of a social platform and that a "creator" can earn revenue is such a fucking dumb idea. Hate it, and all those consequences or need to implemented in another way.
128 character limit meant it was always just going to be bumper sticker style communication, and little else.
Media loves it because it's nothing but proverbial soundbites, completely decontextualized from any greater meaning.
People love it because people love shouting meaningless slogans and quotes and pretending they are the epitome of depth of meaning, belief, and argumentation.
It's stupid because it was designed for stupid people.
It's always been a cesspool of short messages.
Cant really have meaningful message in 144 characters on a platform like that.
Plus it's never been good at moderation.
No one should use Twitter because of their algorithm alone. All the networks have unhealthy algorithms but Twitter is the most concerning considering Musk’s views and desire to push them on his users.
It is bad because what happened with Elon could happen in the first place.
One person can control it and do what he likes with it, that's bad
so like every social platform except 5 ?
Like with all social media - it's as bad as you make it.
I've never had much of an issue with Twitter's recommendation algorithms. I find they do a pretty good job of showing me content I'm actually interested in. I did get an influx of political content during the owner switch, but either they fixed that on their end or it quickly figured out that I'm not interested. I'm getting none anymore. Like literally zero.
Lemmy would be equally unusable without heavy curating and content filters.
u mean like how ppl talk about the current event like got was at the time ? Yeah social network were really different before the 2015 and apparition of trump
that was what i was saying ? When i said got it was to reference game of throne that was wild in discussion on social media and a good exemple of how ppl use theml before political discussion became the norm. I agree with what you say, im just not quite understanding what you mean with second screen experience
Twitter and Instagram are both bad and the people running them are an important part of that. Leadership is inherently a major part of how things are run and cannot be excluded.
true, even if i feel the suck empire is way more predatory
all 54 comments