all 78 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 22 points 6 months ago

Well, that settles it. There goes my vote for 2008 Clinton.

  • source
  • [–] 60 points 6 months ago (48 children)

    Why are we still talking about shit that Hillary Clinton said nearly 20 years ago?

  • source
  • hideshow 48 child comments
  • [–] 24 points 6 months ago (33 children)

    Because the Republicans are going to get their asses handed to them during the next midterm elections.

    Both Parties Are The Same rhetoric gets pumped out by the right, as a part of their broader voter suppression strategy.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 33 child comments
  • [–] 13 points 6 months ago (32 children)

    It is important to recognize which Democrats are Neoliberals or ruling elite like the Clintons.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 32 child comments
  • [–] 16 points 6 months ago* (31 children)

    By jerking off about something Hillary said nearly 20 years ago?

    Yes I'm sure we'll gain much insight from discussing how much we all hate the Clintons again.

    Edit: that is a crazy instadownvote — sus

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 31 child comments
  • [+] [S] -8 points 6 months ago (30 children)

    Will you forgive trump crimes after he is out of office?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 30 child comments
  • [–] 21 points 6 months ago (29 children)

    No, just like I won't be forgiving or forgetting your inability to debate in good faith.

    If you think jerking yourself off over a widely hated woman is doing anything productive you're a muppet.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 29 child comments
  • [+] [S] -8 points 6 months ago (28 children)

    Since you are the one who defend her. It is you who is jerking off to her.

    I am discussing in good faith. I want to see your consistancy . You proved you are inconsistant

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 28 child comments
  • [+] 13 points 6 months ago* (28 children)
  • [+] [S] -8 points 6 months ago (27 children)

    I am consistent, whether it is Hillary, Trump, or any other warmonger. I do not forget about their crimes and evil rhetoric once they are out of office.

    Your comment is a joke, you’re illiterate and ragebaiting

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 27 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 6 months ago (26 children)

    As I was saying, one of the components of a voter suppression campaign, is increased rhetoric of Both Sides Are The Same variety. The idea is to maximize cynicism. And the workrate should increase as the important election approaches.

    You're merely engaging in, and providing an example of the tactic in real time.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 26 child comments
  • [+] [S] -6 points 6 months ago* (25 children)

    Where did I said both parties are the same? Hillary support war on Iran, Trump support the war on Iran, they are the same in this specific issue but because you Americans are treating your parties as cults , you see everything as a sabotage campaign. Just grow up guys

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 25 child comments
  • [+] 4 points 6 months ago (25 children)
  • [+] [S] -6 points 6 months ago (24 children)

    Don’t piss on my leg and tell me it’s raining.

    I identified a behavior, what it looks like, and then you did the thing with precision.

    Like you just did again.

    You are simply delusional and think someone watching this video will magically refuse to vote for some good democrats like AOC or Ro Khana .

    Put another way, if the topic at hand was Trump is a very bad president, your singular goal would be to insert Sleepy Joe into the conversation as many times as humanly possible.

    False. It is you who if I posted an old video of Trump defending wars you will praise me and kiss my forehead . If trump was a democrats you would get mad at me in the same way you are mad about this video or if I post the video of Trump accusing Biden of trying to start world war 3 , you would not ask me why did I post an few year old video

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 24 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 6 months ago (23 children)

    I make a valid observation of voter disenfranchisement tactics, you verify same.

    Check Proof: your word count

    You're leaning into this as though your life depended on it.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 23 child comments
  • [–] [S] -4 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (22 children)

    You are making invalid bullshit. You are mad that i posted a video about a war monger. That's all because you are a delusional cultist. Funny how there is many post about people attacking aoc and you cultist are nowhere to be found but the politician how backed every single intervention make you all go crazy

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 22 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 6 months ago (21 children)

    You are making invalis bullshit. You are mad that i posted a video about a war monger that's all because you are a dilusional cultist.

    And you're doing heavy lifting for Donald Trump.

    If you are unable to detect how things have been a smidge different for the planet since the Trump regime took power, then you're exactly the voice that Donald Trump wants to hear.

    Know with confidence that you're working in unison with a billionaire-class funded campaign to supress the democrat voter turnout.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 21 child comments
  • [–] [S] -5 points 6 months ago* (20 children)

    And you're doing heavy lifting for Donald Trump.

    You are dilusional. I talked bad abour Trump a lot more than you. You are mad thst I posted a post about a warmonger

    Hilary would definitly be better for americans but as bad when it comes to Iran amd Gaza. Hilary may even have more competent admin that would allow israel and the usa cresting a failed state in Iran

    Hilary is not funded by billionaire? You are dilusional

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 20 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 6 months ago (19 children)

    Hilary would definitly be better for americans but as bad when it comes to Iran amd Gaza. Hilary may even have more competent admin that would allow israel and the usa cresting a failed state in Iran

    I guess you're right. The speculative scenario you're imagining here sounds horrific.

    Thankfully, we only have the reality Donald Trump and Pete Hegseth to deal with.

    I can see how what Donald Trump and Pete Hegseth are up to currently, is absolutely eclipsed by the horrors of Hillary Clinton quotes from almost two decades ago.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 19 child comments
  • [–] [S] -3 points 6 months ago (18 children)

    Thankfully, we only have the reality Donald Trump and Pete Hegseth to deal with.

    I can see how what Donald Trump and Pete Hegseth are up to currently, is absolutely eclipsed by the horrors of Hillary Clinton quotes from almost two decades ago.

    And that's why I am vocal about trump attrocities. Also because american presidents got away with vietnam, afghsnistan, iraq, libya, syria and gaza , Trump will get away with his war crimes.

    Like I said a million of time . I do not forget about warmongers , I will talk about Trump war crimes till I die

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 18 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 6 months ago (17 children)

    Like I said a million of time . I do not forget about warmongers , I will talk about Trump war crimes till I die

    Like I said, rhetoric of the Both Sides are the Same variety, as a major election approaches, is very, very helpful for Donald Trump.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 17 child comments
  • [–] [S] -2 points 6 months ago (16 children)

    You are discussing in very bad faith. You are too delusional if you believe that posting a video about Hillary's warmongering will make people not vote for a good candidate like AOC or Ro Khanna. Everybody knows each politician only represents themselves; Ro Khanna is not held accountable for something another Democrat says, for example.

    How is Hillary threatening Iran for a lie she invented about an imaginary Iranian nuclear program not as bad as Trump telling the same lie to start a war?

    There are certain users who call AOC a secret Zionist. Why didn't it bother you as much as a video about Hillary the warmonger, who backed up all American foreign intervention only to later pretend that it was a mistake?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 16 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 6 months ago (15 children)

    You are discussing in very bad faith. You are too delusional if you believe that posting a video about Hillary's warmongering

    Hillary's warmongering is the specific phrase that you are attempting to repeat as much as humanly possible.

    Once again, what is currently happening at the hands of Donald Trump and Pete Hegseth, is absolutely uninteresting to you.

    By the way, your antics are harmful to excellent Democrats like AOC.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 15 child comments
  • [–] [S] -2 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (14 children)

    Hillary’s warmongering is the specific phrase that you are attempting to repeat as much as humanly possible.

    Are you denying that she supported many American interventions resulting failed states and hundred thousands of death. when she was in position of power like in Libya? How calling her a war monger is not accurate

    Once again, what is currently happening at the hands of Donald Trump and Pete Hegseth, is absolutely uninteresting to you.

    Once again I am vocal about it. You are turning a blind eye about it because you want to convince yourself that I am supporting Trump . That's what cultists does .

    By the way, your antics are harmful to excellent Democrats like AOC.

    By the way you blindly defending warmongers when they are democrats is currently what harm aoc.

    How about addressing my points and questions for once. Why didn't it bother you when there was posts criticizing AOC?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 14 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 6 months ago (13 children)

    Tl;dr: one more repetition of Hillary is a warmonger, and a declaration of intent to repeat it.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 13 child comments
  • [–] [S] -2 points 6 months ago* (12 children)

    I asked you to explain how she is not a warmonger. You refused. How is that not bad faith by you?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 12 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 6 months ago (11 children)

    I asked you to explain how she is not a warmonger. You refused. How is that not bad faith by you?

    Your confusion is based on the idea that there is a debate happening.

    As the midterm elections approach, you will ramp up rhetoric against high profile Democrats.

    I'm describing a specific tactic, and you're executing on that tactic.

    What you are doing is in keeping with what I'm claiming.

    There is no need to address your concerns re: bad faith.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 11 child comments
  • [–] [S] -2 points 6 months ago (10 children)

    You didn't answer the question . How Hillary is not a warmonger ?

    As the midterm elections approach, you will ramp up rhetoric against high profile Democrats. . I’m describing a specific tactic, and you’re executing on that tactic.

    You have zero evidence that I am doing that

    There is no need to address your concerns re: bad faith.

    Bad faith is to not answers people questions, accuse people with no solid evidence. It is you who is doing it.

    If you don't want to address my concerns just disengage

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 6 months ago (9 children)

    Tl;dr:

    Additional repetition of Hillary is a Warmonger.

    You have zero evidence that I am doing that

    See above summary. See your future comments history.

    All consistent with my claim.

    For example, Pete Hegseth, Secretary of War prays using fake Bible verses from Pulp Fiction, in support of what he is selling as a holy War.

    For normal people, the visceral response to Pete Hegseth trying to sell some Christian Nationalist bullshit, in conjunction with the President posting memes of himself as Christ, is to want to get them out of power quick fast and in a hurry.

    But not you. You see the same reality and go: This calls for complaining about an old Democrat.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] [S] -1 points 6 months ago (8 children)

    Additional repetition of Hillary is a Warmonger.

    As long as you don't an good argument disproving my point, I will keep repeating it

    See above summary. See your future comments history.

    Still waiting for the proofs

    For example, Pete Hegseth, Secretary of War prays using fake Bible verses from Pulp Fiction, in support of what he is selling as a holy War.

    Did I ever defended him? I know Pete is a nazi and war mongers and he is also incompetent. I still remember him unable to even keep classified information private . I compared Trump to Hitler multiple time

    But not you. You see the same reality and go: This calls for complaining about an old Democrat.

    I talk badly about politicians from both side, while you can only condemn . This literally like the fifth goddamn time I said something along that line in this post but again cultists like you love to ignore things that doesn't fit your narrative

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 6 months ago (7 children)

    As long as you don't an good argument disproving my point, I will keep repeating it

    False. No action on my part will stop you.

    Again, in keeping with my thesis.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] [S] -1 points 6 months ago* (6 children)

    False. No action on my part will stop you.

    Actually no action my my part will stop you for claiming that I try to sabotage dems chance of winning

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 6 months ago (5 children)

    Actually no action my my part will stop you for claiming that I try to sabotage dems chance of winning

    Nonsense.

    When your whataboutism stops, my criticism of your actions (I'd go after anyone else doing that shit) will just evaporate.

    If your initial post and comments were all about We need AOC, and/or All AIPAC candidates need to be replaced, you'd have support instead.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] [S] -1 points 6 months ago (4 children)

    Whataboutism is hypocrites like you're favorite word. There's no whataboutism about holding all politicians the same when they use the same rhetoric. When Hillary claimed Iran was seeking a nuke without proof, she was wrong; when Trump says the same thing, he is wrong.

    If your initial post and comments were all about We need AOC, and/or All AIPAC candidates need to be replaced, you’d have support instead.

    So you want me to only keeps about the good democrats? You are proving again that you think like a cultist , you don't want people to criticize the warmonger on your side only about the warmonger on the other side. I am sorry but I will keep condemn bad people no matter what is their affiliation and praise them when they do something good.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 6 months ago (2 children)

    I am sorry but I will keep condemn bad people no matter what is their affiliation

    Tl;dr: I will do what I can to discourage democrats from voting.

    and praise them when they do something good.

    No, you'll increase the volume and quantity of Democrats Bad/Just as Bad/Whatabout Hilary rhetoric.

    You will do so with passion. No one, and no thing will stop you.

    Maximal engagement regarding who isn't in power, Minimal engagement about the current atrocities being committed by the current regime.

    It's what you have been doing, and what you will continue to do.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 6 months ago* (1 child)

    I appreciate you incurring psychic damage to ensure this troglodyte knows their place.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 3 points 6 months ago

    I'll never know whether it's freelance or if it's paid gig work, but I have a low tolerance for anyone that schleps for Trump.

    I certainly won't track them, but they will absolutely keep yipping in the exact way that I described, and will ramp it up as the midterm elections approach. It will be measurable, and there will be little to no anti-Trump rhetoric in their content.

    I appreciate your kind words on psychic damage, but between you and me, I get tremendous joy out of making asshats go bonkers by just describing what they're doing.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (-1 replies)
  • load more comments (-1 replies)
  • [+] [S] -22 points 6 months ago (10 children)

    Because we should never forget warmongers. She may decide to run again

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] 16 points 6 months ago (9 children)

    "...oh yeah? Well Hillary bla-bla-bla and Biden bla-bla-bla, how about them apples?"

    It's ridiculous to see the mental gymnastics of the cult members at play. All while we're still dealing with the aftermath of the two wars George W. Bush started, while he and his friends were placing some heavy investments in Halliburton and Blackwater. And coincidentally, the stock market is making leaps and bounds nowadays. Wonder who have been calling their brokers lately.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [+] [S] -14 points 6 months ago* (8 children)

    The only cultist here is you. Both parties you have is the usa are cults. Unlike you, I do not forget war criminals from both side

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [+] 6 points 6 months ago (8 children)
  • [+] [S] -15 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (7 children)

    Even worse. You are not american yet you still worship american war criminals. Hilary support wars, trump support wars so they those two war criminals that are equally bad. I did not say every democrats is as bad as every republicans

    I am not american either I still call for every single goddamn war criminal from both parties to rot in jail including genocide Trump unlike you defending Hilary like she is your dominatrix

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 6 months ago (5 children)

    The fuck are you on about, kid?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [+] [S] -10 points 6 months ago (4 children)

    about hating warmongers and criminals

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 6 months ago (3 children)

    No - you’re making wild and completely unfounded assertions about who people are “worshipping”. Nobody fucking likes Hillary. You’re outraged about something that isn’t a thing.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [+] [S] -10 points 6 months ago (2 children)

    Stop pretending. if those people I accused of being worshipers hated her they would not get mad about this post being posted and downvoting it . You are projecting , you are the one getting outraged

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 6 months ago (1 child)

    I’m not downvoting the vid you posted. But I am downvoting your obnoxiously pithy and inane comments.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [+] [S] -7 points 6 months ago

    Look at my responses to lwoj in this post. He disagreed with me and was respectful. I was too.

    You and the other members started with the agressive tone but get mad when I am responding the same way

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (-1 replies)
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 16 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (9 children)

    I mean there are reasons she lost the 2016 election, part of it was the progressive wing staying home, this is pertinent from that lens, but I'm not sure what else?

  • source
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 6 months ago (2 children)

    I wouldn't project it into a progressive lens, at least not first.

    You need to contextualize the moment Hillary' and the country are in 2008-2016. There had been an anti-war movement as soon as the war plans were announced, but it was dutifully ignored by corporate media, in accordance with American tradition. The American economy was being swept by the peak of the "great-recession", occupy wall street happens around this time. But that energy really doesn't get funneled into electoral politics until much later. It was grass-roots, outside power almost exclusively in the context of that time. Many of the leftist orgs that are now considered passe would have been avant-garde in that time (code pink etc). And keep in mind, Hillary was an opponent of Obama. She lost an election, and badly, speaking like this.

    Political Progressivism as we understand it today doesn't really become a thing in the US until Bernie taps into that occupy wall street energy (really, as a direct effect of the both hope given to, and subsequent failure of, the Obama administration) and funnels it into electoral politics.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 6 months ago* (1 child)

    Disagree, I think you have your timeline mixed up.

    The 2016 election occurred well after Occupy Wallstreet, and Bernie Sanders and the progressive wing in the democrats felt snubbed in 2016, which is why many of them stayed home.

    I know this because I was one of them, and I will have to live with that decision for the rest of my life.

    Edit: I am not realizing you might be referring to the 2008 primary election, I'm talking about the 2016 presidential election here and in my original comment. Contextually it (your response) makes sense based on the date of the video, so I get your point, but not what I was talking about.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 3 points 6 months ago

    re edit:

    Yeah I'm talking about her in the 2007/8/9 time period. Just that a progressive or even vaguely left win element in electoral hadn't manifested politically. Those ideas and political power were 100% outside power at the time. So its a bit anachronistic to use the term progressive because in the 2008 time period when this was said we really didn't neccessarily use that word. At the time might use the term "anti-war" for the same basket of policies. That period was also just after the peak of the neo-cons where the litmus test among Democrats was being "anti-war", and obviously, Hillary failed that.

  • source
  • parent
  • [+] [S] -20 points 6 months ago (5 children)

    She may decide to run again. We should never forget warmongers positions . There is also the rhetoric that genocide Trump was the only one who was stupid enough to start a war of agression on Iran

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 6 months ago* (4 children)

    I would be dumbfounded if she managed to place well in a primary election, people are also allowed to evolve their views.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [+] [S] -13 points 6 months ago (3 children)

    The thing is Hillary never evolve . Someone may be wrong about one American intervention but to initially openly support all the American interventions then claims to regret it , that person simply become a pathological liar and a hypocrite

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 6 months ago* (2 children)

    Are you from the United States? I don't mean this any kind of way besides in the United States the Clintons (H and W) are both dead and buried, their most recent discussion was about Bill's ties to Eppstein.

    They aren't going anywhere politically anytime soon.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 18 points 6 months ago

    Oh good. Shit no one cares about...

  • source
  • [–] 26 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (6 children)

    Why is an ancient quote by a failed presidential candidate that was made 8 fucking years before her campaign being posted anywhere outside of a history sub? Why don't you post complaints about her email server too?

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [+] [S] -12 points 6 months ago* (4 children)

    Progressives are agianst war criminals.You can report my post, let see if do not fit in the community

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 12 points 6 months ago (1 child)

    Progressives should be against trolling about irrelevant ancient trivia too, yet you posted it anyway.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [+] [S] -9 points 6 months ago

    I am not trolling. Just because you hate that I posted a video about a warmonger, it doesn't mean I am trolling. If the post was irrelevant, the admin would have removed my post and comments rather than letting people attack me for it.

    You are rage baiting

  • source
  • parent
  • [+] 4 points 6 months ago* (2 children)
  • [+] [S] -6 points 6 months ago* (1 child)

    She voted for the war in Iraq and she was in the administration when the usa intervened in Libya. She is a war criminal whatever you deny it or not. She backed up all recent american imperialist interventions.

    If the community had an iq test , you would be the one not allowed here

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (-1 replies)
  • load more comments (-1 replies)
  • [–] 12 points 6 months ago (1 child)

    This whole post is just silly.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • At the time, she and Donald Trump were besties.

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 6 months ago

    In the Southern hemisphere, they call her Killiary for reasons.

  • source
  • [–] -2 points 6 months ago (1 child)

    I don't get it... she said she would retaliate against Iran, if Iran attacked Israel with a nuclear weapon. This is inline with any nation that has nuclear weapons, mainly for deterrence, since the start of the Cold War. Do I like it? No... But it's the reality of nuclear weapons existing. The same would happen if Russia attacked any other US ally... And the same would happen if the US attacked any Russia ally. This is why, ultimately, someone will fuck up, and start a chain of events that may lead to Human's extinction. Because any nation that uses nuclear weapons has a very high chance of getting hit by one, immediately after! This applies to Murica, to Russia, to Israel, Iran, Pakistan, France, or any other nation that has nuclear weapons, and regardless to who is in power.

    I honestly don't understand what is the value of this "gotcha" sort of post. Is the OP not aware of how nuclear weapons are used for deterrence purposes? I can assure you, this would happen with whichever POTUS would be in power, even if (and specially if) it was Bernie! Are people forgetting how emotionally tied Bernie is to Israel, and that only after much push back, was he wiling to denounce Israel, when some other of his colleagues in the Senate had already done?

    Hillary has said far more dumb shit recently, like for example, accusing younger folks of being radicalized against Israel by Tik Tok, simply because they are pro-Palestinian, with complete disregard to uncontestable historical facts. I see no value in this post.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] [S] 1 point 6 months ago

    I don’t get it… she said she would retaliate against Iran, if Iran attacked Israel with a nuclear weapon. This is inline with any nation that has nuclear weapons, mainly for deterrence, since the start of the Cold War. Do I like it? No… But it’s the reality of nuclear weapons existing.

    She said multiple time after this interview that she would attack Iran at any point of the building of a nuclear weapon . So she want to invite the lie that Trump is currently using it to justify attacking Iran.

    Secondly , why should the USA should protect a settler colonial power anyway ? Will she attack Israel if Israel threaten to nuke Palestine or Lebanon? Does having a settler genocidal state called Israel deserve to be an American ally?

    And of course you are going to ignore that Hilary backed up multiple American war of aggression . Witch is the exact reason why I called her a warmonger.

    I honestly don’t understand what is the value of this “gotcha” sort of post.

    There is no gotcha. It is just part of your delusional mind . I understand the concept of deterrence but you can't claim deterrence over an inexistent threat

    Hillary has said far more dumb shit recently, like for example, accusing younger folks of being radicalized against Israel by Tik Tok, simply because they are pro-Palestinian, with complete disregard to uncontestable historical facts. I see no value in this post.

    That's your example of dumb? Not only it is evil but she said worse about Palestine. She do not oppose sending arms to israel , she act like she believe in the pallywood propaganda . Blaming the genocide and all the murder of children on Hamas, blaming Palestinians for peace failures, supporting Israel's West Bank wall.

    Since you are a cunning person , I will say it right now Trump said even more evil things about Palestine then Hillary like asking Israel to finish the job

  • source
  • parent