all 17 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 10 points 7 months ago (1 child)

...So the expectation is that a criminal organization would obviously print and build a gun, but they wouldn't sidestep a law to illegally build a 3D printer from scratch to do it?

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 15 points 7 months ago

    The guns are an excuse to kill Right-To-Repair, as well as small scale manufacturing. The big enshitification manufacturers lobbied for this.

    Much the same as the ID laws are not about protecting children, but identifying Internet users

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 11 points 7 months ago (3 children)

    I the US, Buying a gun from some guy in an alley or a gun show, has always been a lot easier than printing one

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 7 months ago (2 children)

    Mentally ill people in the US can own guns legally, there are no rules.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 7 months ago

    Tbf "mentally ill" means a lot more than "a danger to themselves or others." We already do block those who have proven themselves a danger (or we can if the cops do their goddamn jobs which is often the point of failure for cases like Cruz from Parkland), it's one of the rules we "don't" have that if you have been involuntarily committed or convicted of a particular crime(s) you're barred from ownership, but should we ban someone from a right simply for having ADHD, autism, bipolar, gender dysphoria, etc? All that'd do is discourage therapy and be discriminatory, and it's wrong.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 7 months ago

    Where I live, in EU, guns are legal but regulated. Long guns, including semi auto assault rifles require a hunting license, which includes what's called a psychotechnical exam, a basic health, sight, hearing and basic psychological exam. Short guns require an actual psy exam, 30-45 min.

    At least it weeds out clear mental health issues.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 7 months ago

    Establishment democracts trying to again to snatch defeat from the jaws of victory. What kind of tratoris brainrot do you have to have to on one hand acknowledge a growing faciest federal government and on the other hand fight to disarm the people, worse specifically the people mostly likely targeted by that government, while also kneecapping people and communities rights to repair and create what they want and need themselves.

  • source
  • [+] -11 points 7 months ago (4 children)

    What are you doing Mamdani!⸮
    🤣

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 7 months ago (3 children)

    Mayor's not in charge of state laws

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [+] -7 points 7 months ago (2 children)

    Right, his veto can be vetod…

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [+] -12 points 7 months ago (4 children)

    I mean the idea "prevent people from 3D printing guns" is good. At least its heart is in the right spot. 3D printers make it much much easier to make a gun. It's like what AI is doing to development, writing, and so on. Now people who didn't know how to make a gun can do it quite easily with little to no skill.

    However, the problem is always feasibility and privacy. Companies hide their plans from their employees by dividing up the work so that no one is the wiser. Circumventing this at the software level would be easy, just print the parts separately. If everything is tracked, that's a huge breach in privacy.

    These kinds of things only ultimately serve the surveillance apparatus.

    Tracking who owns such a machine capable of printing a gun though🤔 Dunno... Not sure whether I'm against that. I could be convinced either way. We do need licenses to drive our rolling murder machines and not every 3D printer is capable of printing a functional gun.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 7 months ago* (2 children)

    3d printer can't print any of the actual important parts of a gun.

    This is an attack on right to repair. The guns were the Trojan horse, just like the ID laws used protecting the children for.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] -4 points 7 months ago (1 child)

    I'm not going to post it here, but you're way behind dude. There are tutorials out there with every step required to print and operate 3D guns in all shapes and sizes. Sure, it requires a little extra sometimes, and some may be flimsy (one shot), but a shot might be all it takes.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 7 months ago

    I mean the idea "prevent people from 3D printing guns" is good.

    I mean nah, it's legal (in most states/US). Fuck a company deciding what I can and can't do with a product I own, my phone gonna start detecting pirated MP3s next? My Cannon gonna refuse to print porn pics? It's not their damn problem what people print and doubly so if it's legal.

  • source
  • parent
  • 6 comments in c/privacy@lemmy.ml view that post
    [–] 37 points 7 months ago* (3 children)

    So... could I not just disconnect my pc from the internet, or have a desktop or virtual machine without internet access, keep my 3d printer offline, and use a software or 3d modeling software that's open-source, and profit?

    This bill has also just classified my ice tray as a 3D printer, and don't tell anyone but a trip to my local Home Depot with 10 bucks in my hand could potentially make something more dangerous.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 7 months ago

    As usual, it's difficult to discern dumb from malicious, but this is politics, so I assume it's a bit of both.
    Companies lobbying for anti-repair, the need to control the citizens and the means of production, or trying to pander to a particular group (they're printing knives in school, oh no!)

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 7 months ago

    Tariffs so people will start producing more in US. Also, don't produce in the US.

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 7 months ago

    From the thumbnail: New York, California, ... Generic US state?

    /s

  • source