top 30 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 28 points 7 months ago (1 child)
  • [–] 46 points 7 months ago (5 children)

    $500M/day would represent roughly 1000 megawatts of solar farm, per day. Depending on where said farms are located that could power at least 250,000 homes. For the next 25 years. Per day.

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 15 points 7 months ago*

    A steady demand and generation would eventually drive down the costs (unless there's a resource scarcity), generating jobs, related industries and r&d.
    In addition, it would also drive down power costs and with it make power-intensive production cheaper, which might retrofit into solar generation costs.

    And the longer I think of this make-believe magical world where politicians do sensible things that help us, the angrier I get on our shitty reality.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 7 months ago (2 children)

    The batteries to support them unfortunately cost an order of magnitude more and you kinda need to smooth out all that generation.

    Would still be a hell of an investment into energy security, not just sustainability.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 7 months ago

    Good thing battery costs are dropping at over 10% per year (for lithium ion), and tons of other options exist for grid scale stationary applications, like iron-air, sodium, vanadium flow, gravity, pumped water, compressed air, kinetic…)

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 22 points 7 months ago

    If we can only comprehend war in economic terms then we have already lost everything that makes a society worth preserving.

  • source
  • [–] 18 points 7 months ago (4 children)

    And that doesn't even include the cost of a caring for a new cohort of traumatized service members with inadequate counseling support and fewer resources for jobs and housing back home

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 17 points 7 months ago (2 children)

    Does that include losses (1 AWACS, at least 5 F15)?

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 12 points 7 months ago (1 child)

    This could fund so much daycare and healthcare and food and housing assistance…

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 11 points 7 months ago* (2 children)

    And thats not even counting the reparations trump agreed to-- to rebuild everything trump and Israel have blown up.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 7 months ago

    It was all planned for Jared Kushner to leech off of the infrastructure development and repair contracts in Israel and the land they just stole from Palestine and Lebanon.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 10 points 7 months ago

    Good thing we all just filed our taxes

  • source
  • [–] 16 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

    And thats why they need to cut NASA's science budget next year, so they can fund a few weeks of war with Iran.

    Science is great and all, but have you heard of bombing people for no reason?

  • source
  • [–] 12 points 7 months ago

    Cost of residential solar install in CA is 30k.
    $500M/$30k= 16,666 solar installs on homes a day. Around 60,000 people a day. Getting free energy for the next 20 years.

  • source
  • [–] 6 points 7 months ago

    There’s some estimates that are considerably higher. Some of the official estimates calculate the cost of the object at the cost at the time of acquisition ie in 2010 a tomahawk cost $10 million but today it will cost $20 million (numbers only for example). Or they used v1 bombs at $100k but they retired them and will replace them with v2 at $400k.

    The math is wobbly, to say the least.

  • source
  • [–] 6 points 7 months ago

    Stablest genius.

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 7 months ago

    cool. I think im no longer eleigible for snap.

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 7 months ago

    At over 1 trillion per year, we get about 3 billion poet day. So only 1/6 of regular, planned spending.

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 7 months ago

    But Kamala laughs.

  • source