all 23 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 17 points 7 months ago (5 children)

CNN is a garbage company with garbage privacy invasion. Here's a link to the article where you don't have to sign your soul away to this devil.

https://archive.ph/N7Cnt

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 7 months ago (4 children)

    archive.today isn't fantastic either, unfortunately. A while back they took advantage of their popularity to DDoS another site that they had a beef with. uBlock Origin had to add a rule to prevent visits to the site from causing your computer to make an entirely unnecessary network request that contributed to the attack.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 7 months ago (3 children)

    What's an alternative? I'm open to using a different one.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 7 months ago (2 children)

    Only one I know of is archive.org / The Wayback Machine, but that's got limitations that archive.today never had, since the latter ignored corporate restrictions & U.S. copyright law. So not a perfect replacement, sadly.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 7 months ago (16 children)

    Tl;dr. The geniuses at nasa didn't take frozen space into consideration, and piss froze in the pipes, clogging the lines. Morons.

  • source
  • hideshow 16 child comments
  • [–] 13 points 7 months ago

    Saying they didn't take it into consideration sounds overly harsh, especially without a source for it. Reminds me of that old tale of how "NASA made a space pen, the Russians used a pencil," which neglected to mention how problematic pencil graphite was in space.

    I think it's fair to give NASA the benefit of the doubt.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 9 points 7 months ago (8 children)
  • [–] -1 points 7 months ago (7 children)

    You send people to space, where they can't just pull over when something goes wrong, and you put their lives at risk by not thinking of the things that could harm or kill them? That's why.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 7 months ago (6 children)

    I'm pretty sure the astronauts signed up knowing the risks. They're also extremely trained for this mission which is why they were able to resolve it. They aren't just along for the ride.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 7 months ago (5 children)

    And by 3:30 p.m. ET Saturday, early in Day 4 of the flight, mission controllers had a plan of attack

    Mission control temporarily solved it, while the astronauts were sleeping. But, yes, I know they're highly trained and are far better equipped for these types of missions than any of us. However, the risks they signed up for don't include those borne of stupidity and carelessness. Nasa should have done better. These astronauts deserve better. Nasa has no excuses here.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 7 months ago (4 children)

    Pretty sure giving Lockheed or Boeing contracts at this point covers the careless and stupid part.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 7 months ago (3 children)

    Yeaahhh but there's at least some shared accountability. Lockheed messed up and NASA didn't catch it.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 7 months ago (1 child)

    That isn't really how contracts work, NASA is paying Lockheed to do the work and certify its good to go. Unless there is some meeting where Lockheed engineers were saying "the pee gonna freeze" and NASA said nope we have to go we don't have time to fix it (sort of what happened with Challenger), its up to Lockheed to deliver what they were paid to. In this case a working human spaceflight certified capsule.

    It seems plausible to me that a noncritical system like this wouldn't be specifically called out in the certification of the capsule, we have only made a few like this before, and the worry is more "will this blow up and if something goes wrong can we fix it" not "is the pee tube warm".

    I do think NASA should be more involved in the engineering of these things, but the rich want to mine asteroids or whatever, so they lobby for private spaceflight and that's what we've got now. Thus the corporations get the blame when they screw up, not NASA.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 7 months ago

    I'll correct you there. NASA can only check what they are allowed to. Lockheed will not share shit. One big misconception is that NASA has access to all proprietary info. These sleazy contractors do every single thing they can to hide as much as possible, and the back room golf course deals enable it. Additionally, nowadays, if NASA disagrees, they can basically say fuck off and do it anyways. Contractors have fucked NASA for decades now.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 5 points 7 months ago (5 children)

    Haven't they done this before?

    Hopefully they have a backup system or a way to heat the pipes.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 7 months ago (4 children)

    They've done this many time, and, apparently, didn't think of it. Per the article, they turned the shuttle to face the sun, so the piss melts.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 7 months ago (3 children)

    Next problem, they have to waste fuel turning the ship to defrost the piss.

    Or they have to turn the ship after peeing to freeze the shit because it stinks.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments