Hello m@teys,

I've been waiting for this a long time (half a year), personally. After seeing the surge in piefed instances, i.e. blahaj, .ca, .zip, quokk.au, and .world creating their own instances, and clients guaranteeing future piefed support, we've been thinking about potentially opening an instance in the future. Not a guarantee, just an idea. This isn't a voting thread, just a discussion. Later on we'll actually vote on this.

Do note that this thread will not guarantee an instance; we are discussing a hypothetical. Suggestions? Ideas? Criticisms? make your voice heard.

Have a good week!

pie picture comes from here

governance type: sense check

A cherry pie topped with vanilla ice cream

top 100 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 52 points 1 year ago (1 child)

I mean, unless you're closing here I don't mind what you do. I think this is the best instance. I think the leadership is top notch.

I'm a happy guy

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [+] 37 points 1 year ago (2 children)
  • [–] 28 points 1 year ago (1 child)
  • [–] 26 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    I was hoping a dbzer0 piefed instance would happen sometimes in the future! I would totally use it, since it has some pretty cool features that Lemmy has been quite slow in implementing. For example, merged communities that cover one specific topic.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 20 points 1 year ago (6 children)

    I think I'm for it, but I also don't know if I understand the implications. So, some questions:

    • Is there a downside?

    • Would this be in addition to lemmy or a replacement?

    • If it is in addition to, is that the permanent plan, would this be working toward an eventual switch-over?

    I should probably try piefed a bit so I understand it a bit better, but it's just a different Lemmy basically, right? Does it federate with existing Lemmy?

    If it doesn't federate with what we already have, I'd have to keep up with two things, and two is a big number, so I'd probably just pick one and stay there.

    Anyway, exciting nonetheless. I'll go eat some pie now and see what that's all about.

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] [S] 10 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Is there a downside?

    Not really, i think. We have the resources, and being an admin isn't too time consuming; surely we can make time for an extra instance.

    Would this be in addition to lemmy or a replacement?

    Addition

    If it is in addition to, is that the permanent plan, would this be working toward an eventual switch-over?

    Probably not. There would be way too many potential issues and it's risky.

    I should probably try piefed a bit so I understand it a bit better, but it's just a different Lemmy basically, right? Does it federate with existing Lemmy?

    Yep. Try https://quokk.au/ (anarchist instance, too!) which is basically the closest thing we have right now

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 23 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    Piefed federates with lemmy, it's basically a clone written in python instead of rust, with advanced moderator tools, and developed by people who aren't braindead Stalinists.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 20 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (15 children)

    A comment I came across a while ago puts it quite well:

    I haven't used piefed myself but I wouldn't want to switch to it because I feel like it gives more power to downvotes and karma (or "reputation" as they call it):

    • Comments with -10 score are collapsed by default.
    • People who get downvoted a lot end up with a ‘low reputation’ indicator next to their name. You’ll know it when you see it.
    • Upvotes in meme communities do not add to reputation.

    Those are three of the twelve points listed as differences to lemmy on their features page.

    I also don't agree with some of the points in their article on "PieFed features for growing healthy communities".

    from: https://sopuli.xyz/comment/17119490
    the comments' thread is also quite interesting

    Plus it's written in Python and has only 1,6k MAUs, so we can only guess how well it scales

    Slightly edited from an older comment of mine:

    EDIT: as such I believe that operating a Piefed instance would be a waste resources and actually harmful considering the fragmentation it would cause for little to no benefit at all (also it seems much better set up for a new Reddit with all the .world'ers flooding over there and the anti-features)

  • source
  • hideshow 15 child comments
  • [–] [S] 13 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (8 children)

    I think rimu has made the karma system to be optional (i.e. in the admin settings, not hardcoded) so we'd just disable it anyway. I think the second feature should only apply to mods/admins, since its a very useful tool. #1 #3 i agree, they are not good.

    I'll address each point in the Piefed Features for growing healthy communities:

    Find people who have low karma

    This applies to admins, and while not really that effective, its okay to have.

    Find people who downvote too much

    This is a very useful tool, since this is a big problem on lemmy. Same thing; only for admins

    Spot spam easily

    Sounds like a good idea; but with feature #3 as you pointed out, this might cause some new-user shitposters to get falsely flagged, but we would disable it anyway.

    Don’t award karma in low-quality communities

    This is now opt-in, and we would disable it.

    https://chat.piefed.social/#narrow/channel/5-admins/topic/Low.20reputation.20communities/near/1872

    Warnings on unusual communities

    We would add nothing to communities, anyway; users are free to do whatever they want, themselves. (maybe to our own instance communities like /0 and governance? But not much honestly.

    Icons next to comments by low karma accounts

    As i said before, probably should only be seen by admins/mods.

    Icon for new accounts

    No problem here; most clients do this anyway.

    Automatically delete content based on phrases in user name

    Sounds very useful, and which is why piefed didn't struggle at all with nicole.

    Report accounts, not just posts

    Good idea.

    Instance-wide domain block

    We have this on lemmy too

    Automatic reporting of 4chan content

    Not a good idea imo. We'd disable it.

    Plus it's written in Python and has only 1,6k MAUs, so we can only guess how well it scales

    We'll always have this lemmy instance anyway :) but afaik it scales fine, and has some optimizations coming along soon.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 1 year ago* (5 children)

    Genuine question: Lemmy provides a good, solid backbone and API, right? And a lot of 3rd party tools & clients make up for it's "deficits", even in admin tools. So why do we need a big monolith and risk fragmentation, even if the features are "native"?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] [S] 11 points 1 year ago* (3 children)

    Clients can only do so much sadly. For example, they can't make polls, user flairs, implement passkeys, following threads, disabling, proper blocking implementations, and etc.

    Even then, the features that clients can somewhat implement (like post tags) rely on others using the same client, and aren't considered as a standard.

    For the karma features, we'll be sure to disable it if we made our own instance. And as we said; the lemmy instance will always be active and the main instance.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

    True that, I suppose Piefed has it's advantages with a faster development pace.
    Although I'm still sceptical, especially regarding fragmentation

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • [+] 4 points 1 year ago (4 children)
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago* (3 children)

    I'd be willing to bet that the backend isn't

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 20 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    i like lemmy a lot. i also like that piefed seems to have better mod tools (at least i am told so). as one of the many people who lost their lemm.ee account to mod burnout, i think the important thing is what you like to work on.

    if you can only support one plattform, choose the one you like better - i will most likely follow db0 for its governance.

    if you can support both platforms and have fun doing so, i don't see a downside in it.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 19 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    Some of my thoughts:

    I value the community that we have and the style of communication that makes Lemmy different from other forum type software.

    I very much dislike the political views of its creators.

    I have an account on Piefed and while it's not terrible, it's still not as nice as here. I think it can get there over time.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] [M, B] 17 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

    Acknowledged governance topic opened by https://lemmy.dbzer0.com/u/fxomt GNU: an icon of a wildebeest, in orange-red, black and white colors A book with a loaf of bread in the cover  in orange-red, black and white colors First Mate: a pirate ship's steering wheel, orangered color

    This is a non-voting post. Known users should leave comments with your thoughts on the subject.

  • source
  • [–] 15 points 1 year ago (5 children)

    I don't think it's a good idea, but i don't care so long as the lemmy instance stays open.

    I think people's concerns over the politics of the developers are overblown and fragmenting into a new project weakens the fediverse - especially when I don't see anything wrong with the software that is being done differently in piefed.

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 12 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    I think people's concerns over the politics of the developers are overblown.

    It seems a little unnatural because people are trying to hide their racism, xenophobia, western superiority mentality, but the developers also made a lot of political posts to frame them as CCP talking heads. They should have just used alt accounts like rest of the internet platform owners. Rookie mistake.

    But, at least they're honest about what they are and not covertly creating a foss product by hiding some sinister motive to rugpull later, like bluesky.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    I missed something I think, what's wrong with Bluesky?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 1 year ago

    Bluesky will with 100% certainty turn to shit once the investors start sinking their claws into it. Every platform that is driven by profit will eventually turn to enshittification just like reddit is doing right now. Its inevitable. I'd rather set my focus on something like Lemmy or piefed which isn't profit driven and can be forked.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • [–] 14 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    If admins are okay with running both Lemmy and Piefed instances simultaneously then it seems fine IMO.

    But otherwise don't feel strongly about it, I don't know that I'd actually use the Piefed instance unless something happens within the Lemmyverse side of things or issues with the dbzer0 Lemmy instance itself.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 28 points 1 year ago (20 children)

    I don't trust Piefed at all - they're far too eager to curate my experience, and they've reintroduced all of the reputation anti-features (plus more) that were part of what drove me away from Reddit and the absence of which is part of what I like about Lemmy and Mbin.

    If you're contemplating a second instance, I don't much care, because I can simply not use it. If you're contemplating a move, I think it's an awful idea.

  • source
  • hideshow 20 child comments
  • [–] [S] 31 points 1 year ago (12 children)

    iirc Piefed started as a small personal project, so it was quite opinionated. Now that there's more users rimu has said he'll make it more neutral, and give more power to instance admins.

    And yep, it's a second, separate instance

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 12 child comments
  • [–] 24 points 1 year ago (11 children)

    rimu has said he’ll make it more neutral

    I'll believe it when I see it.

    It's an odd thing - the Lemmy devs are notoriously opinionated and intolerant, and are constantly castigated for it, but I don't recall ever seeing even a single hint of their opinions or even their intolerance baked into the Lemmy software.

    Piefed, meanwhile, is a direct reflection of the dev's biases right from the start, and with everything from the curated subscription lists to the karma and private voting, seems designed explicitly for the purpose of empowering bias.

    Say what you will about Dessalines and Nutomic - at least they keep their biases to their own instance and out of the Lemmy software. And further, they appear to have gone to some lengths to make the software as neutral as possible - not only not reflecting any specific bias but limited in ways that make it difficult for it to even be used to impose bias.

    And the same can NOT be said for Rimu and Piefed.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 11 child comments
  • [–] 12 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

    Perfectly put, .world is already turning into a new Reddit and Piefed is perfectly made to encourage turning into a new Reddit once all the .world'ers move there

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    That's exactly my concern. It's gotten too much exposure too quickly recently, so it doesn't feel organic, and between subscription gatekeeping, software level censorship snd the reputation anti-features, it just feels like it's been cynically designed specifically to undermine the benefits of the fediverse and turn it into another place where narratives can and will be shaped and controlled.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 9 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (5 children)

    private voting

    After having discussed with a few people, Rimu agreed to drop the private voting. The system will switch to two votes button

    This provides better transparency than Lemmy, as users are now complaining about tool like lemvotes: https://lemmy.dbzer0.com/post/48233901/19876557

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    Wait for real? Damn that sucks that was by far the best killer feature.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago (3 children)
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    Seems like maybe that was premature considering a lot of people are still surprised by this. I'm on here pretty much daily and hadn't heard of it. Also it's incredibly shitty to stovepipe that conversation on matrix. It's the same shit reddit mods do with discord.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    The discussion was open on both Matrix and Piefed, as shows the link above

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago

    Seeking stakeholder involvement is the product of publicity and outreach, not just technically something being in public. I do a lot of community organizing and local government stuff and "the meeting was public" doesn't cut it if you don't advertise it. In fact, people will rightfully get pissed off if you say that.

    I'm not going to spend a bunch of time worrying about this either way, but a bunch of devs and admins talking about it on matrix isn't exactly community outreach. Rimu puts universal messages for other things, so it seems like that could have drawn some more widespread input.

    And again I know this isn't the place to debate this, but a lot of users in that thread seem to want to preserve private voting. It's mostly admins and devs punting on the issue.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 22 points 1 year ago (5 children)

    I don't know much about Piefed. What anti-features are you talking about?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 15 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    It tracks karma, automatically collapses replies and hides threads based on downvote thresholds and attaches icons to usernames to tell other users in advance that they have been downvoted in the past. And alongside that, votes are hidden. So a few determined users (or even one determined user and a few bots) can easily silence other users or even effectively censor content just by mass downvoting.

    Just like Reddit, and notably NOT like the rest of the threadiverse which has done away with karma, doesn't auto-hide downvoted users or content snd makes votes public.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 child)

    votes are hidden.

    After having discussed with a few people, Rimu agreed to drop the private voting. The system will switch to two votes button

    This provides better transparency than Lemmy, as users are now complaining about tool like lemvotes: https://lemmy.dbzer0.com/post/48233901/19876557

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago*

    It's crazy to see Rodneyck come up in this. I banned that account when it showed up to one of the communities I'm moderating 18 days ago and dropped five downvotes in quick succession. Something lemvotes helped me identify quickly.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 12 points 1 year ago* (7 children)

    I dont really care, but I won't be using piefed. the default UI doesn't allow me to adjust the size of thumbnails as i see fit: tiny and on the left. that's a deal breaker for me, even if it's petty.

    I do not like new reddit and i have never liked new reddit and i have tried new reddit and will not be using new reddit. piefed UI is a new reddit ripoff.

    or i guess a lot of social media platforms do that layout, Twitter FB insta. thankfully i dont waste my time with that shit either. I waste my time with YOU nerds and I am happy with that

  • source
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 1 year ago (5 children)

    Piefed has a custom CSS section in the settings that allows you to resize the thumbnails as you see fit

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    interesting! still easier to just not use it than to learn CSS

    not to mention, Voyager... like the whole reason I came to Fediverse to begin with was the loss of RIF app

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 12 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    Here's my two cents:

    Because there's no direct integration with Lemmy, and we start with an empty piefed instance. I'll have to create a user and all that, and I "just" quit Reddit so it's not very appealing to me, even if piefed has better features.

    I would create an account if everyone migrates, or if I can click a "move to piefed" button that copies all my comments and posts.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] [S] 5 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    Wdym no direct integration?

    Sadly those two are not possible for us to do now, but the lemmy instance will always be the top priority.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 child)

    It would be direct integration (maybe I chose the wrong term) if piefed could share the database with Lemmy, then uses only had to start using the new features in piefed.

    Because they are two different activitypub implementations I would not expect easy migration to be possible in the near future or ever, most likely only if it becomes a part of activitypub.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 9 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    I really hate fragmentation. Linux suffers heavily from it. It creates redundant work. I think duplicate projects are curse on the open source so thats why I am not in favor of that.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • I think this may be a good idea. The questionable performance/behavior of the core Lemmy devs does not give me confidence for the long term prospects of Lemmy as a code base and service.
    piefed seems to be growing rapidly while Lemmy has stagnated. There's obviously a reason for that.

  • source
  • [–] 9 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    Why would you go through the pain of maintaining another service? What is the actual benefit for you as an instance manager, but also for the user?

    I’d rather have few very good maintained services, than the opposite.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] [S] 9 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    From my admin POV, lemmy lacks in a lot of ways that just makes it harder for me to get stuff done.

    From my user POV, lemmy lacks features like flairs/tags, actually working blocking, feeds, etc.

    It's not too much of a pain, since dbzer0 doesn't take much work to keep running.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    I’ve been a sys engineer for a long time. You have to know that it just adds up. A tiny service here, a tiny service there, some custom code here and there. If you will fully manage it, go for it. Then piefed will be up as long as you or a successor manages it. This setup will not affect lemmy and db0 and that’s all I want and care for.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] [S] 6 points 1 year ago

    Thank you :) it will not affect lemmy.dbzer0 at all, and we don't bother modifying the source code of lemmy/piefed (besides themes) but besides that, it should hopefully be smooth sailing if it happened.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 8 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    Growing is usually good. Do the expanded tools to the admins warrant the additional headache?

    Sometimes being small and having your own dark little corner of the internet where the “normies” don’t hang out is OK too.

    A lot of forums started with a barrier of entry that required a small bit of tech savvy to get there. Not that picking an instance to get on the fediverse is that hard, but if it’s keeping someone at bay, that might be preferable.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 1 year ago

    Honestly, I am against it. I think we should collectively improve Lemmy and port whatever features make PieFed a worthy alternative. Better mod tools? Get them on lemmy instead. Lemmy's UI is much faster and responsive than PieFed, I have found. I just don't like seeing the community split over and over again. Even if they are federated services, it just splits the community and serves as friction of entry. Choice overload is a really thing, it may lead to decision paralysis and get us fewer and fewer people on these services.

  • source
  • [–] 8 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    I don't know a ton about piefed , but wouldn't that be more likely to divide the community?

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 7 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    I think a la mode is overrated.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    I would love this! I'd totally be in!

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 13 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Against this idea as it merely causes significantly more work the instance maintainers with (imo) quite limited benefits. I'd only be in favour if lemmy began crashing and burning for whatever reason.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments
    view more: next ›