Paywall bypass: https://archive.ph/vP9rn

The U.S. military has fired more than 850 Tomahawk cruise missiles in four weeks of war with Iran, burning through the precision weapons at a rate that has alarmed some Pentagon officials and prompted internal discussions about how to make more available, said people familiar with the matter.

The missiles, which can be launched from Navy surface warships and submarines, have been a staple of U.S. military attacks since they were first used in combat in 1991 during the Persian Gulf War. But only a few hundred are manufactured each year, meaning the global supply is limited. The Pentagon does not publicly disclose how many missiles are in its inventory at any one time.

Tomahawks are prized in part because they can travel more than 1,000 miles, reducing the need to send American pilots into well-defended airspace. The heavy reliance on them in the Iran conflict will require urgent discussions about whether to relocate some from other parts of the world, including the Indo-Pacific, and a concerted long-term effort to build more, said several U.S. officials, speaking on the condition of anonymity to discuss sensitive military planning.

The dilemma has laid bare broader concerns in both the Pentagon and Congress about the Trump administration’s war in Iran, its shifting explanations for why the conflict is necessary, and the risks a shortage could pose to the United States as it balances the potential for future conflict in other parts of the world. It comes as the White House deliberates over a possible major escalation in Iran, to include the use of ground troops, while pursuing negotiations to end hostilities.

no comments (yet)

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
there doesn't seem to be anything here
12 comments in c/world view that post
[–] 29 points 7 months ago (8 children)

They take 2 years to build, the military bought 57 last year, and we went through 850 so far in this war.

Wow. No wonder Trump is leaning towards a ground invasion.

  • source
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 20 points 7 months ago* (7 children)

    It doesn't make sense though, they claim we have had air supremacy since like day 2. Why does the US need expensive missiles if they have air supremacy? Just drop dumb bombs wherever you want, we supposedly have like close to infinite bombs.

    Does the US really have air supremacy? Were those planes that went down really from friendly fire and accidents?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 7 months ago (3 children)

    It makes sense if you assume the goal is to destroy the USA.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 17 points 7 months ago (1 child)

    Even the most heartless, unempathetic among us who don't care we're in a war must realize: among many other things, this is a shit ton of spending. These things are not cheap.

    The man is (further) bankrupting a nation with poor decisions.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 7 months ago
    3 comments in c/usa@lemmy.ml view that post
    [–] 7 points 7 months ago (2 children)

    Tomahawks need semiconductors. Semiconductors need rare earth metals. The biggest producer/refiner of REMs is China, by far. So when the Iran war eventually ends, the US will want to replenish their stock piles, thus they'll need access to Chinas rare earth market.

    I wonder if China will use that leverage. They could restrict access for whatever reason, leaving the US potentially unable to defend Taiwan. At the same time, this would probably alarm every other REM-dependent nation to ramp up alternative supply chains. So this leaverage can be used only once.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 7 months ago

    They've already stopped exports of rare earths to US arms manufacturers. They're the largest producer of gallium by several orders of magnitude, if I remember correctly, so it won't be easy to find an alternative.

  • source
  • parent
  • 2 comments in c/usa@midwest.social view that post
    [–] 2 points 7 months ago (1 child)

    I’m sure there won’t be any consequences from these actions

    /s

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment