As the title.

Should there be a new rule added where intentional removal of credits and watermarks from other peoples works be deleted?

Only thing i can think against it is if the original artist isn't known. Usually someone in the comments finds it though

all 32 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 111 points 7 months ago (5 children)
  • [–] 83 points 7 months ago (2 children)

    and OP didn't credit it πŸ‘€

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] [S] 19 points 7 months ago

    Ha I hadnt even noticed! I saw so many uncredited posts recently I didnt think it was already discussed. Obviously didn't bother searching either. My mistake xD

    Tbf I didnt even post this for credit. I just wanted to kickstart a discussion but looks like its already got traction on the other post so im happy

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 34 points 7 months ago

    Yes, absolutely.

  • source
  • [–] 32 points 7 months ago

    Yes, absolutely.

  • source
  • [+] 64 points 7 months ago (3 children)
  • [–] 16 points 7 months ago (2 children)

    He was active a few weeks ago. Maybe he is on vacation or something. Relax.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 26 points 7 months ago (2 children)

    Yes. Unfortunately, proving intentionality in smaller cases than beep may be difficult. But it's useful as something to lean back on when it's obvious/egregious like their case.

    First step would be enforcing the existing rules lime two posts per day per user, imo.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 7 months ago (1 child)

    Just say that if it doesn’t have a watermark the poster has to provide a link to the original.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 67 points 7 months ago

    Imo anyone caught removing credits should get banned

  • source
  • I have strong opinions on the matter

  • source
  • [–] 16 points 7 months ago

    I think that deliberately removing credits should be against the rules but if they try to link back to the artist to give attribution in the event that the comic has already had attribution removed I would be okay with that so long as the rest of the work is intact. The individual who's been shown to be using AI to remove watermarks and artist signatures really ought to receive a suspension or something both for their ridiculous post rate (far exceeding the new rule about 2 posts per day), and also because they admit to removing attibution on purpose.

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 7 months ago (2 children)

    I actually think it's morally correct to strip stone toss or Scott Adam's names from thier works.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • I don't think it's morally correct to remove their names. People have the right to know who the artist is.

    There's the old question, can you separate the art from the artist? Everyone is going to have a different opinion, and for those that say no; sharing a comic without saying who it's from doesn't allow them to decide "that's a Scott Adams comic, fuck that guy".

  • source
  • parent
  • [+] -22 points 7 months ago (10 children)
  • [–] 25 points 7 months ago* (6 children)

    Because we as a community, value this.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [+] -7 points 7 months ago* (5 children)

    Is your name "a community"? I for one don't care either way. I can always ask an OP if I want to know who created a strip I liked if a signature is missing.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 7 months ago (3 children)

    Yes, I solely represent the entire community and we all agree on this topic.

    Or, and this is even crazier, I saw the many threads where Beep was downvoted to shit and berated because of this, and I'm able to summarize that information.

    But no, that can't be right because it means you're not the center of the universe. It must be that first one.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] -2 points 7 months ago (2 children)

    But no, that can't be right because it means you're not the center of the universe. It must be that first one.

    According to you, it is yourself who is the centre. Go figure πŸ™„

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 7 months ago (2 children)

    "Only rules that make it more fun are allowed!" Ok toddler-elected-mayor, good luck with that shit.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments